重生之币圈胡哥
shiba进圈，一级市场错过5000倍两个，千倍币数个，百倍币无数，链上项目分析，二级市场交易量数据论，土狗和现货赚的多数合约爆了，已戒合约，2024年10月1号之前坚定喊单BTC8万起，目前投身币安alpha。关注我，可能不会让你暴富，但是可以让你成为真正的死而不僵老韭菜。
9 Following
229 Followers
415 Liked
37 Shared
All
Quotes
See original
Why have limit orders suddenly quadrupled? Although it is said to be four times, in reality, it is two times. For example, if you used to do 2+16, now you are doing the original transaction amount, which has changed to 2+17 points.
This tactic is apparent; first, it isolates quantitative measures. Everyone knows that the mplx is skyrocketing, with over 100,000 trades a day. Although this is partly due to it being easy to trade, more importantly, everyone has noticed this wave of imitation coins. The quantification has been particularly aggressive; many coins can pull several times yet still not die immediately. On one hand, people's sentiment has improved; on the other hand, quantification has been consistently supporting the market, combined with short selling and wave trading, leading to a high-level consolidation without reducing volume. Secondly, limit orders now basically require manual trading, although there may be some auxiliary tools, fully automated ones should be relatively rare. This is also the simplest way to resolve the issues with low-scoring technology accounts in bulk.
However, none of this really matters much; the biggest problem now is that airdrops are hard to grab. If quadruple points are used to set the threshold, then I believe that the 250 points for first-come, first-served is really not far away.
#alpha
This tactic is apparent; first, it isolates quantitative measures. Everyone knows that the mplx is skyrocketing, with over 100,000 trades a day. Although this is partly due to it being easy to trade, more importantly, everyone has noticed this wave of imitation coins. The quantification has been particularly aggressive; many coins can pull several times yet still not die immediately. On one hand, people's sentiment has improved; on the other hand, quantification has been consistently supporting the market, combined with short selling and wave trading, leading to a high-level consolidation without reducing volume. Secondly, limit orders now basically require manual trading, although there may be some auxiliary tools, fully automated ones should be relatively rare. This is also the simplest way to resolve the issues with low-scoring technology accounts in bulk.
However, none of this really matters much; the biggest problem now is that airdrops are hard to grab. If quadruple points are used to set the threshold, then I believe that the 250 points for first-come, first-served is really not far away.
#alpha
B
APTUSDT
Perp
Closed
PNL
+45.21USDT
See original
$TA has already been first come, first served for 210, how far can the first come, first served for 250 be? Anyway, I didn't get it.
See original
$MPLX I'm here to brag too, the upward trend is brushed, made a million dollars, thank you all the卷王卷神卷圣.
I fucking put in this effort to make a million dollars in this damn game, if I had this ability, I would have already made a fortune in counterfeit, brushing this broken trading competition.
I fucking put in this effort to make a million dollars in this damn game, if I had this ability, I would have already made a fortune in counterfeit, brushing this broken trading competition.
See original
$ESPORTS
@CZ @Yi He @币安Binance华语 @币安中文社区 is it really first come, first served? I’ve never wanted to play Alpha this much before. Now trading tournaments are really hard to do, with contracts starting at basically $1 wear. Clearly, there’s already a large voice of opposition in the community, whether on Twitter or in the square, always talking about canceling first come, first served or canceling early facial recognition, yet they keep pushing for first come, first served without any action. Are we really just leaving the tech department with low scores to fight for it every day?
Being a black slave is already tragic, and they really don’t give any way out!
Who does the early facial recognition design benefit? Who does it really benefit? You tell me, my account never jumps, who is it actually convenient for?
Who does first come, first served benefit? Like most people, I can accept having some barriers, at least it can make money. Now with first come, first served, there’s only outgoings, no incomings. Who does it really benefit?
@CZ @Yi He @币安Binance华语 @币安中文社区 is it really first come, first served? I’ve never wanted to play Alpha this much before. Now trading tournaments are really hard to do, with contracts starting at basically $1 wear. Clearly, there’s already a large voice of opposition in the community, whether on Twitter or in the square, always talking about canceling first come, first served or canceling early facial recognition, yet they keep pushing for first come, first served without any action. Are we really just leaving the tech department with low scores to fight for it every day?
Being a black slave is already tragic, and they really don’t give any way out!
Who does the early facial recognition design benefit? Who does it really benefit? You tell me, my account never jumps, who is it actually convenient for?
Who does first come, first served benefit? Like most people, I can accept having some barriers, at least it can make money. Now with first come, first served, there’s only outgoings, no incomings. Who does it really benefit?
See original
@Yi He @CZ @币安Binance华语
Every time I try, I can't get it. Is it really possible to manually grab it? Does internet speed also play a role? Basically, I can claim a card in one second, then it reports an error, sigh.
Teachers, can you set some thresholds? Or at least cancel the facial recognition in advance!!! At least then I could have a chance; otherwise, I really can't get it. I've never managed to get it. My score is already 258, and I have nowhere to spend it.
#alpha $esports
Every time I try, I can't get it. Is it really possible to manually grab it? Does internet speed also play a role? Basically, I can claim a card in one second, then it reports an error, sigh.
Teachers, can you set some thresholds? Or at least cancel the facial recognition in advance!!! At least then I could have a chance; otherwise, I really can't get it. I've never managed to get it. My score is already 258, and I have nowhere to spend it.
#alpha $esports
See original
Report to all the卷王卷神卷圣, I added 80,000 today, and tomorrow it's still 70,000+, I will keep adding, whether I earn or not is no longer important, I don't want to experience the pain of being pressed under the threshold by fuel. It's too painful.
$MPLX
$MPLX
See original
@币安Binance华语 @CZ @Yi He Teacher, can we be more professional?
I’m exasperated, after half a day I haven't even earned 1 BNB? It can't be that the investors aren't active enough, right?
#tge
I’m exasperated, after half a day I haven't even earned 1 BNB? It can't be that the investors aren't active enough, right?
#tge
See original
$PENGU has raised again, I don't understand it at all, completely don't understand, and I don't dare to chase the high prices. I am not worthy of this rich club.
I recommend everyone to stake a little SOL on this PENG, it was around the same time as PENGU, and it seems the two interacted back then. The peak market value was 200 million, and it has been at the bottom for a long time now.
This one has also been listed on several exchanges like Sesame and Matcha, and the community and Twitter are still updating normally.
I recommend everyone to stake a little SOL on this PENG, it was around the same time as PENGU, and it seems the two interacted back then. The peak market value was 200 million, and it has been at the bottom for a long time now.
This one has also been listed on several exchanges like Sesame and Matcha, and the community and Twitter are still updating normally.
See original
Teacher @CZ @Yi He @币安Binance华语 , what's going on with this first come, first served thing? Is it giving advantages to the low-scoring studio? Those of us with manual transmissions really don't even deserve a whiff of it; there used to be a face-to-face chance, but now, even the face-to-face is ahead of time. How are we supposed to compete with the automatic transmissions? I really haven't received anything in a long time, my score has been stuck above 230.
Recently, I've been set up in the trading matches continuously.
#alpha
Recently, I've been set up in the trading matches continuously.
#alpha
B
NEWTUSDT
Perp
Closed
PNL
-29.54USDT
See original
$FUEL I originally thought 70,000 was the limit, but it turns out that was just my limit, not the limit of all the top competitors, the competition gods, and the competition saints.
How much wear and tear did I get for brushing 80,000 yesterday?
How much wear and tear did I get for brushing 80,000 yesterday?
See original
$PUMP doesn't know if the world has turned upside down or if the crypto circle has always been like this.
trump currently has a market cap of 2 billion, ray 1.4 billion, jup 1.4 billion.
But this thing opened with a circulation of 2 billion?
A bunch of people are still looking at 0.1? 0.2?
Once famous, it only takes from the project party, purely a wave of heat, and then a bunch of people rush in?
trump currently has a market cap of 2 billion, ray 1.4 billion, jup 1.4 billion.
But this thing opened with a circulation of 2 billion?
A bunch of people are still looking at 0.1? 0.2?
Once famous, it only takes from the project party, purely a wave of heat, and then a bunch of people rush in?
See original
$FUEL I have always been curious about who is really pushing things forward. Although there are only 9,000 spots, most of the people who should have brushed have already reached 300,000. However, this threshold keeps increasing steadily by 40,000 to 50,000 every day. Is there some inflated statistic from Binance? For example, do they count market-making and quantitative grids as well? Yesterday's upward trend of +50,000 can be understood, but this fuel basically has no counterparty, and the probability of losing money is 90%. Can they really raise the threshold like this?
Of course, there are also people bragging about how much they have earned by brushing. Stop talking nonsense and mistaking luck for skill. The upward trend can still be discussed; if you have the ability to imitate such a good market, focus on these small gains.
As for me, today I basically lost 20-30 dollars on 60,000. There's no way around it; it's already reached 300,000, and I can't just give up to someone who has only reached 200,000.
Of course, there are also people bragging about how much they have earned by brushing. Stop talking nonsense and mistaking luck for skill. The upward trend can still be discussed; if you have the ability to imitate such a good market, focus on these small gains.
As for me, today I basically lost 20-30 dollars on 60,000. There's no way around it; it's already reached 300,000, and I can't just give up to someone who has only reached 200,000.
See original
$br About the things that must be said about br.
I don't know if this market is pathological, but as long as it's a coin that can pump, regardless of the situation, just short it. Whether the interest rate is negative 2% or what the market cap and liquidity are, it's ridiculous that I saw someone say they want to protect their rights for $H. I ask you, whether it's a pump or a dump, or even sideways, if it doesn't go according to your script, it's about protecting rights, and if you bet wrong, it's the dice's fault?
I digress, let's return to br. I haven't specifically written a post about br before, but I mentioned in one that brushing points with br is the optimal choice. When I see someone shorting br in the plaza, I generally advise against it. Why? Because from the beginning, br had a market cap of 10 million, a pool of 20 million (of which 10 million was the local currency), to the first pump of 15 million market cap, 60 million pool (of which 30 million was the local currency), to now 26 million market cap, 33 million pool (of which 16 million was the local currency), it is obvious that this coin won't be affected by major bad news because when the pool is larger than the market cap, it indicates that there aren’t many coins outside, so how can it be dumped? Moreover, now brushing br is the optimal solution; large holders who add to the pool really earn LP profits, not like the previous zk j koge where the pool and market cap were not proportional, and there were large amounts of liquid chips outside, which when dumped just meant that the LP was paying the bill for the leeks.
Therefore, as long as the trading volume of br doesn't decrease, the probability of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs is relatively small. Of course, anything can happen in the crypto world, but shorting is really not recommended; the market cap is low and liquidity is sufficient, isn't shorting just giving away fuel? Of course, I also don't encourage holding coins; you should brush points as you should, because there is no coin that offers a better solution than this.
I don't know if this market is pathological, but as long as it's a coin that can pump, regardless of the situation, just short it. Whether the interest rate is negative 2% or what the market cap and liquidity are, it's ridiculous that I saw someone say they want to protect their rights for $H. I ask you, whether it's a pump or a dump, or even sideways, if it doesn't go according to your script, it's about protecting rights, and if you bet wrong, it's the dice's fault?
I digress, let's return to br. I haven't specifically written a post about br before, but I mentioned in one that brushing points with br is the optimal choice. When I see someone shorting br in the plaza, I generally advise against it. Why? Because from the beginning, br had a market cap of 10 million, a pool of 20 million (of which 10 million was the local currency), to the first pump of 15 million market cap, 60 million pool (of which 30 million was the local currency), to now 26 million market cap, 33 million pool (of which 16 million was the local currency), it is obvious that this coin won't be affected by major bad news because when the pool is larger than the market cap, it indicates that there aren’t many coins outside, so how can it be dumped? Moreover, now brushing br is the optimal solution; large holders who add to the pool really earn LP profits, not like the previous zk j koge where the pool and market cap were not proportional, and there were large amounts of liquid chips outside, which when dumped just meant that the LP was paying the bill for the leeks.
Therefore, as long as the trading volume of br doesn't decrease, the probability of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs is relatively small. Of course, anything can happen in the crypto world, but shorting is really not recommended; the market cap is low and liquidity is sufficient, isn't shorting just giving away fuel? Of course, I also don't encourage holding coins; you should brush points as you should, because there is no coin that offers a better solution than this.
See original
$EGL1 seems to be here for a joke. I remember when Bob was on contract, he was the second on-chain. The project team even boasted that its market value exceeded Doge or Pepe, and they wouldn't sell unless it surpassed a certain coin. Now that it's on Alpha, it's not worth a dime? Who cares if you go to the sky or end up in the ground.
Binance probably listed it just because they saw its trading volume.
Binance probably listed it just because they saw its trading volume.
See original
$BANANAS31 Regarding this coin, I have some of my own opinions to share.
In the past few days, I've seen many people say how strong this coin's market maker is. Out of curiosity, I went to have a look. First of all, this is a serious 'local dog' coin, just like the ban on the Solana chain, but this kind of local dog has managed to get listed on Binance, and I don't know who set this up.
Then I looked at various dimensions such as the holding community. First, from the community perspective, this is a serious fruit plate, and the Telegram group isn't very lively. Occasionally, someone chats, but there's no FOMO or FUD.
From the holding perspective, Binance is undoubtedly the largest holder because most of the liquidity is definitely on the exchange. The exchange has 60 million in spot trading volume, while the on-chain volume is only 20 million. This can also be seen. The top 100 on-chain are almost all airdrop coins, and from my perspective as a retail investor, it's just a mouse warehouse.
Then, looking back at its past trends, it's not that there is a strong market maker, but rather that the quantification is very high, similar to many large local dog coins of Solana. The front row does not sell randomly, and slowly accumulates, then the quantification supports it. When someone enters the market, it leads to that kind of turnover phenomenon.
As for why there is a sudden surge sometimes, you have to ask the short sellers. That's right, sometimes it's the short sellers who push the price up. In fact, coins with quantification support are hard to short. After all, the market cap is just over 100 million, and the short sellers have recently been confused by altcoins. Most of them take a little profit and run, so when a short position is closed, it represents a buying action, leading to a false rebound or surge. Many short sellers, watching the situation, might feel it's not right or see short-term profits and just run away. This market has always been dominated by short-term players, regardless of whether they are bullish or bearish; 99% die at the peak or trough.
However, theoretically, it should be about time. With 600 million in trading volume for contracts, only Pepe and Doge are ahead of it as meme coins. This isn't exactly a phenomenal meme; it's just that the mouse warehouse hasn't started cashing out yet. If you want to see it drop, it's simple: don't frequently open positions; let its trading volume go down, and naturally, the quantification will disappear, and the range will drop as well.
I believe there aren't many people looking bullish at this position. It takes a lot of faith to be bullish at a high position 😂
In the past few days, I've seen many people say how strong this coin's market maker is. Out of curiosity, I went to have a look. First of all, this is a serious 'local dog' coin, just like the ban on the Solana chain, but this kind of local dog has managed to get listed on Binance, and I don't know who set this up.
Then I looked at various dimensions such as the holding community. First, from the community perspective, this is a serious fruit plate, and the Telegram group isn't very lively. Occasionally, someone chats, but there's no FOMO or FUD.
From the holding perspective, Binance is undoubtedly the largest holder because most of the liquidity is definitely on the exchange. The exchange has 60 million in spot trading volume, while the on-chain volume is only 20 million. This can also be seen. The top 100 on-chain are almost all airdrop coins, and from my perspective as a retail investor, it's just a mouse warehouse.
Then, looking back at its past trends, it's not that there is a strong market maker, but rather that the quantification is very high, similar to many large local dog coins of Solana. The front row does not sell randomly, and slowly accumulates, then the quantification supports it. When someone enters the market, it leads to that kind of turnover phenomenon.
As for why there is a sudden surge sometimes, you have to ask the short sellers. That's right, sometimes it's the short sellers who push the price up. In fact, coins with quantification support are hard to short. After all, the market cap is just over 100 million, and the short sellers have recently been confused by altcoins. Most of them take a little profit and run, so when a short position is closed, it represents a buying action, leading to a false rebound or surge. Many short sellers, watching the situation, might feel it's not right or see short-term profits and just run away. This market has always been dominated by short-term players, regardless of whether they are bullish or bearish; 99% die at the peak or trough.
However, theoretically, it should be about time. With 600 million in trading volume for contracts, only Pepe and Doge are ahead of it as meme coins. This isn't exactly a phenomenal meme; it's just that the mouse warehouse hasn't started cashing out yet. If you want to see it drop, it's simple: don't frequently open positions; let its trading volume go down, and naturally, the quantification will disappear, and the range will drop as well.
I believe there aren't many people looking bullish at this position. It takes a lot of faith to be bullish at a high position 😂
See original
Please cherish your points!
From today's airdrop, the score line of 170 was not fully claimed in 30 minutes, what does that indicate?
Picking up trash cannot become an addiction; once you fall into the trash pit, it becomes difficult to climb back out.
I must say, Binance's point reduction tactic is really effective; most users stuck at 230-240 have been completely washed out after several rounds of trash.
Now let's talk about the key point, I personally believe the most suitable model.
2+15 2+16 2+17 basically all apply.
Taking myself as an example,
I basically recover points and continuously take the first batch of 2+17 accounts, which equals 285-15-15-15-15-15=210 or one less, 225.
Because a few days ago, there were days with two or three collections, and it’s important to note that I basically don’t take overnight meals. After all, they are technological; we are manual. Why put in that effort?
Then, when the points come down, within 2-3 days (preferably the next day), if I can pick up a piece of trash, for example, this one today when I was at 210 points, I look for an opportunity to take it. To be honest, although it's only over 30 points, it’s much better than some trash. And this has a trading competition; I can sell it again after I enter the trading competition, and there's no rush, how much lower can it go? It's an old coin by itself.
This way, my account can wait for points to return comfortably. Logically, it means concentrating points over a few days rather than dragging the timeline too long. Picking up one piece of trash in between and one at the end results in the first batch of points never being enough. What’s the use of having such an account with big flaws?
Some people might say, what if there’s a major flaw during the point recovery period? I won’t make it too clear; after all, who doesn’t have family? Of course, I am within the rules; I haven’t touched any technology, and all accounts are normal. It’s essential to learn how to reasonably arrange your accounts to achieve the best income combination, rather than some people daring to take 10 in a month, which directly brings their points below 150 in one cycle, and then whatever comes next, they can only stare blankly.
Still the same phrase, if you want to do alpha, you must learn to plan like doing business, rather than securing everything in hand. As long as this set of combinations is effective, accumulating thickly and releasing thinly, earning alpha is much more stable than when I initially rushed into the dog coins.
#币安Alpha上新
From today's airdrop, the score line of 170 was not fully claimed in 30 minutes, what does that indicate?
Picking up trash cannot become an addiction; once you fall into the trash pit, it becomes difficult to climb back out.
I must say, Binance's point reduction tactic is really effective; most users stuck at 230-240 have been completely washed out after several rounds of trash.
Now let's talk about the key point, I personally believe the most suitable model.
2+15 2+16 2+17 basically all apply.
Taking myself as an example,
I basically recover points and continuously take the first batch of 2+17 accounts, which equals 285-15-15-15-15-15=210 or one less, 225.
Because a few days ago, there were days with two or three collections, and it’s important to note that I basically don’t take overnight meals. After all, they are technological; we are manual. Why put in that effort?
Then, when the points come down, within 2-3 days (preferably the next day), if I can pick up a piece of trash, for example, this one today when I was at 210 points, I look for an opportunity to take it. To be honest, although it's only over 30 points, it’s much better than some trash. And this has a trading competition; I can sell it again after I enter the trading competition, and there's no rush, how much lower can it go? It's an old coin by itself.
This way, my account can wait for points to return comfortably. Logically, it means concentrating points over a few days rather than dragging the timeline too long. Picking up one piece of trash in between and one at the end results in the first batch of points never being enough. What’s the use of having such an account with big flaws?
Some people might say, what if there’s a major flaw during the point recovery period? I won’t make it too clear; after all, who doesn’t have family? Of course, I am within the rules; I haven’t touched any technology, and all accounts are normal. It’s essential to learn how to reasonably arrange your accounts to achieve the best income combination, rather than some people daring to take 10 in a month, which directly brings their points below 150 in one cycle, and then whatever comes next, they can only stare blankly.
Still the same phrase, if you want to do alpha, you must learn to plan like doing business, rather than securing everything in hand. As long as this set of combinations is effective, accumulating thickly and releasing thinly, earning alpha is much more stable than when I initially rushed into the dog coins.
#币安Alpha上新
The historical high score of 251 has arrived. Let me analyze why, despite the decrease in numbers and the banning of so many accounts, the score is not only maintained but has actually risen.
First, the existence of br. Firstly, this coin has a market value of 10 million and a pool of 20 million, plus the refund of transaction fees, which means almost everyone can brush past the low wear of the previous large pools like zkj and koge. I joked with friends that for such projects, we don't even need to care about what actions have been taken; the refund of transaction fees alone is already a construction.
Second, the most common tiers are still 2+15 and 2+16. So, if we reverse-engineer, 18*15=270-15-15=240, or 17*15=255-15=240 (there's a chance of hitting the second one, or there’s a possibility for a base score of 3). Although only two are obtained, calculating at 50u means an income of 100u, while the wear calculated by brushing br is only about 45u (a friend just corrected me that approximately 15=3 and 16=6 wear, and there were only a few days of activity). Of course, all of this is disregarded. The most crucial point is that if these people do not pick up trash, most are stuck at the 230-240 score line, making it impossible for airdrops below 240; otherwise, wouldn’t over 70,000 accounts be able to claim?
Third, the existence of trading competitions. I believe everyone knows that if trading competitions are done well, the wear can basically be recovered. That's why we see the striving Chinese people; the ridiculous threshold for trading competitions is also evident. Basically, those brushing for 3-5 days are around 300,000, meaning that the 65,000 tier has been brushed up. Because human nature dictates that if I can earn rewards without losing, or at least lose less, then it’s profit—after all, it’s free to earn points.
So it currently seems that there really isn't a better solution, as so many accounts are stuck at 230-240. Unless there is another wave of resignations. As long as there are still 100,000 accounts grinding, the score line will inevitably remain above 240.
I hope Binance can come up with another move to consume points, such as having earned so much from transaction fees, can they take out some real money to support a few hardworking builders in the alpha space (let's ignore those like rex who run away with the pool). Buy back and then distribute airdrops again, so that project parties who genuinely work can see hope after reaching alpha, creating a virtuous cycle, rather than the current situation where unscrupulous project parties see alpha with shining eyes, while quality project parties shake their heads at the mention of alpha.
Now, it seems that 2+16 is indeed the optimal solution, but it really lacks flavor.
First, the existence of br. Firstly, this coin has a market value of 10 million and a pool of 20 million, plus the refund of transaction fees, which means almost everyone can brush past the low wear of the previous large pools like zkj and koge. I joked with friends that for such projects, we don't even need to care about what actions have been taken; the refund of transaction fees alone is already a construction.
Second, the most common tiers are still 2+15 and 2+16. So, if we reverse-engineer, 18*15=270-15-15=240, or 17*15=255-15=240 (there's a chance of hitting the second one, or there’s a possibility for a base score of 3). Although only two are obtained, calculating at 50u means an income of 100u, while the wear calculated by brushing br is only about 45u (a friend just corrected me that approximately 15=3 and 16=6 wear, and there were only a few days of activity). Of course, all of this is disregarded. The most crucial point is that if these people do not pick up trash, most are stuck at the 230-240 score line, making it impossible for airdrops below 240; otherwise, wouldn’t over 70,000 accounts be able to claim?
Third, the existence of trading competitions. I believe everyone knows that if trading competitions are done well, the wear can basically be recovered. That's why we see the striving Chinese people; the ridiculous threshold for trading competitions is also evident. Basically, those brushing for 3-5 days are around 300,000, meaning that the 65,000 tier has been brushed up. Because human nature dictates that if I can earn rewards without losing, or at least lose less, then it’s profit—after all, it’s free to earn points.
So it currently seems that there really isn't a better solution, as so many accounts are stuck at 230-240. Unless there is another wave of resignations. As long as there are still 100,000 accounts grinding, the score line will inevitably remain above 240.
I hope Binance can come up with another move to consume points, such as having earned so much from transaction fees, can they take out some real money to support a few hardworking builders in the alpha space (let's ignore those like rex who run away with the pool). Buy back and then distribute airdrops again, so that project parties who genuinely work can see hope after reaching alpha, creating a virtuous cycle, rather than the current situation where unscrupulous project parties see alpha with shining eyes, while quality project parties shake their heads at the mention of alpha.
Now, it seems that 2+16 is indeed the optimal solution, but it really lacks flavor.
See original
In fact, I have traded very little recently, trying to resist trading, because I no longer have faith in the clones, plus my mindset has been affected by the Solana chain, but I still want to post some encouragement for myself.
$HIFI
$HIFI
See original
The historical high score of 251 has arrived. Let me analyze why, despite the decrease in numbers and the banning of so many accounts, the score is not only maintained but has actually risen.
First, the existence of br. Firstly, this coin has a market value of 10 million and a pool of 20 million, plus the refund of transaction fees, which means almost everyone can brush past the low wear of the previous large pools like zkj and koge. I joked with friends that for such projects, we don't even need to care about what actions have been taken; the refund of transaction fees alone is already a construction.
Second, the most common tiers are still 2+15 and 2+16. So, if we reverse-engineer, 18*15=270-15-15=240, or 17*15=255-15=240 (there's a chance of hitting the second one, or there’s a possibility for a base score of 3). Although only two are obtained, calculating at 50u means an income of 100u, while the wear calculated by brushing br is only about 45u (a friend just corrected me that approximately 15=3 and 16=6 wear, and there were only a few days of activity). Of course, all of this is disregarded. The most crucial point is that if these people do not pick up trash, most are stuck at the 230-240 score line, making it impossible for airdrops below 240; otherwise, wouldn’t over 70,000 accounts be able to claim?
Third, the existence of trading competitions. I believe everyone knows that if trading competitions are done well, the wear can basically be recovered. That's why we see the striving Chinese people; the ridiculous threshold for trading competitions is also evident. Basically, those brushing for 3-5 days are around 300,000, meaning that the 65,000 tier has been brushed up. Because human nature dictates that if I can earn rewards without losing, or at least lose less, then it’s profit—after all, it’s free to earn points.
So it currently seems that there really isn't a better solution, as so many accounts are stuck at 230-240. Unless there is another wave of resignations. As long as there are still 100,000 accounts grinding, the score line will inevitably remain above 240.
I hope Binance can come up with another move to consume points, such as having earned so much from transaction fees, can they take out some real money to support a few hardworking builders in the alpha space (let's ignore those like rex who run away with the pool). Buy back and then distribute airdrops again, so that project parties who genuinely work can see hope after reaching alpha, creating a virtuous cycle, rather than the current situation where unscrupulous project parties see alpha with shining eyes, while quality project parties shake their heads at the mention of alpha.
Now, it seems that 2+16 is indeed the optimal solution, but it really lacks flavor.
First, the existence of br. Firstly, this coin has a market value of 10 million and a pool of 20 million, plus the refund of transaction fees, which means almost everyone can brush past the low wear of the previous large pools like zkj and koge. I joked with friends that for such projects, we don't even need to care about what actions have been taken; the refund of transaction fees alone is already a construction.
Second, the most common tiers are still 2+15 and 2+16. So, if we reverse-engineer, 18*15=270-15-15=240, or 17*15=255-15=240 (there's a chance of hitting the second one, or there’s a possibility for a base score of 3). Although only two are obtained, calculating at 50u means an income of 100u, while the wear calculated by brushing br is only about 45u (a friend just corrected me that approximately 15=3 and 16=6 wear, and there were only a few days of activity). Of course, all of this is disregarded. The most crucial point is that if these people do not pick up trash, most are stuck at the 230-240 score line, making it impossible for airdrops below 240; otherwise, wouldn’t over 70,000 accounts be able to claim?
Third, the existence of trading competitions. I believe everyone knows that if trading competitions are done well, the wear can basically be recovered. That's why we see the striving Chinese people; the ridiculous threshold for trading competitions is also evident. Basically, those brushing for 3-5 days are around 300,000, meaning that the 65,000 tier has been brushed up. Because human nature dictates that if I can earn rewards without losing, or at least lose less, then it’s profit—after all, it’s free to earn points.
So it currently seems that there really isn't a better solution, as so many accounts are stuck at 230-240. Unless there is another wave of resignations. As long as there are still 100,000 accounts grinding, the score line will inevitably remain above 240.
I hope Binance can come up with another move to consume points, such as having earned so much from transaction fees, can they take out some real money to support a few hardworking builders in the alpha space (let's ignore those like rex who run away with the pool). Buy back and then distribute airdrops again, so that project parties who genuinely work can see hope after reaching alpha, creating a virtuous cycle, rather than the current situation where unscrupulous project parties see alpha with shining eyes, while quality project parties shake their heads at the mention of alpha.
Now, it seems that 2+16 is indeed the optimal solution, but it really lacks flavor.
See original
@币安Binance华语
Teacher, what do we call the ones who did not receive their items back from the confiscation but were close to the threshold for the trading competition? That term, what is it again, substitute priority?
$BNB
#taiko
Teacher, what do we call the ones who did not receive their items back from the confiscation but were close to the threshold for the trading competition? That term, what is it again, substitute priority?
$BNB
#taiko
B
ETCUSDT
Perp
Closed
PNL
+114.11USDT
See original
The people over in Northern Myanmar are also confused; there weren't this many people sending money before, what's going on lately? After opening Google, then Intel, after Intel, Facebook, and in a couple of days, you'll have Tesla, Alibaba, and Douyin all set up. Anyway, there are plenty of gullible people in the square to send money. It just can't be cut off, it just can't be cut off 😁
Wishing those involved in this early capture in Northern Myanmar to face the consequences.
$BNB
#bsc
Wishing those involved in this early capture in Northern Myanmar to face the consequences.
$BNB
#bsc
S
BNB/USDT
Price
646.08
Login to explore more contents