Announcement: I am not available as a commercial influencer to help any Web3 games with their promotion or ambassador program towards gamers.
Over the past year, as a player, I have shared data about playing blockchain games, written insights, and maintained honesty. I consider my losses as investment failures and accept them; there are very few blockchain game projects that have actually made me profit, or made me profit at certain stages, and I analyze why I made a profit, based on what time and entry point I invested.
Sometimes I also criticize project teams for their mistakes, as a player holding assets, I give opinions and suggestions, and if criticism is warranted, I will criticize, but it should be done in a civil manner.
The project teams usually do not listen to me, and as a blockchain game player, when I am not optimistic about a project's direction, I will vote with my feet at most, selling my assets. Typically, when problems arise in a project, it becomes very difficult to sell assets quickly, often requiring significant losses.
Of course, if I think the project team's game is well-made and the operation is strong, I will also give positive feedback; usually, this happens when the game asset prices are stable. If game assets drop too much, the blockchain project team can do nothing right, and there may be large players with significant losses threatening to issue a 'kill order' against the project team's staff.
Not accepting any paid promotional contracts for blockchain games is my final stubbornness, and I will persist; even if I am short on money, I will not accept them. The reality is that I have mostly lost money investing in blockchain games, indicating that my judgment is likely to be wrong. Taking money from the project team to promote it and getting players who believe in my judgment onboard will only lead to that money becoming a burden or a liability in the future.
For those with extremely weak financial luck, unable to bear wealth and likely to have a short life, I prioritize my own safety.