computer01
12 Following
12 Followers
19 Liked
0 Shared
See original
$NIL This form seems to be continuously selling, and retail investors are frantically buying.
See original
Some people can compare BTC to gold, but are they really the same thing?
BTC indeed has its own use, which is its portability and decentralization. The development of BTC has also created a unique new type of financial market.
However, the price of BTC is extremely unstable, making it impossible to regard as a mainstream financial asset. The price can rise by 10% in one day and drop by half in another.
Therefore, it can only be used as an additional financial reserve.
It cannot be compared to gold.
BTC indeed has its own use, which is its portability and decentralization. The development of BTC has also created a unique new type of financial market.
However, the price of BTC is extremely unstable, making it impossible to regard as a mainstream financial asset. The price can rise by 10% in one day and drop by half in another.
Therefore, it can only be used as an additional financial reserve.
It cannot be compared to gold.
Xinhua News Agency fired a shot! China began to snipe Bitcoin, and was no longer polite to Musk
On December 6, Xinhua News Agency reporter Su Liang published a commentary titled (The U.S. financial ecology and risks behind the “Bitcoin surge”). This is really a heavy rain that comes at the right time - we have already started discussing Trump’s cryptocurrency conspiracy “in advance” in the 1713th issue (Trump wants to build a Bitcoin reserve with $100 billion. How will China fight the world war of digital currency?). On December 5, Trump said that he had appointed David O. Sacks, former chief operating officer of global payment PayPal, as the White House director of artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency affairs to guide the government’s policies on artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency. Trump said that these two areas are crucial to the future competitiveness of the United States and will be committed to making the United States a global leader in these two fields.
See original
$BTC $ETH $core
#CoreChain #CoreDAO
I just want to ask why Binance doesn't list Core. I read a lot of gossip and all kinds of shady things, it's a mess, and now I don't want to read it anymore. Does anyone have a formal reason?
Currently, Core has become the first BTC side chain, listed on Coinbase and Bithumb. Although the current market value is 1 billion, the TVL on the chain is almost 500 million. The assets on the chain do not count non-custodial pledges, and the assets of the entire protocol are 800 million.
There is also an ETP.
This token is a rare token without VC, and the project party has never raised funds. This point is very worth talking about.
Token composition (only the approximate share). A total of 2.1 billion. 500 million airdrops (150 million received, 350 million not received, currently placed), about 300 million contributors' shares, 460 million project party shares owned by the foundation, 840 million mining pool.
(By the way, this is L1, not L2)
How to say it, although BTC DeFi has not made much progress and the current income is not much, but the potential is very huge. Obviously, it has achieved the first place, so Binance does not plan to list it?
Instead, a lot of ton toy coins are listed, not is okay, but the latter ones are worse than the other, and finally this hamster coin is almost dead. (It's okay to divert traffic, but it can't be like this...)
If you say it's a meme, the popularity of the token image is not high. If you say it's a game, then buying tokens is not a taker?
In the end, I just want an explanation.
#CoreChain #CoreDAO
I just want to ask why Binance doesn't list Core. I read a lot of gossip and all kinds of shady things, it's a mess, and now I don't want to read it anymore. Does anyone have a formal reason?
Currently, Core has become the first BTC side chain, listed on Coinbase and Bithumb. Although the current market value is 1 billion, the TVL on the chain is almost 500 million. The assets on the chain do not count non-custodial pledges, and the assets of the entire protocol are 800 million.
There is also an ETP.
This token is a rare token without VC, and the project party has never raised funds. This point is very worth talking about.
Token composition (only the approximate share). A total of 2.1 billion. 500 million airdrops (150 million received, 350 million not received, currently placed), about 300 million contributors' shares, 460 million project party shares owned by the foundation, 840 million mining pool.
(By the way, this is L1, not L2)
How to say it, although BTC DeFi has not made much progress and the current income is not much, but the potential is very huge. Obviously, it has achieved the first place, so Binance does not plan to list it?
Instead, a lot of ton toy coins are listed, not is okay, but the latter ones are worse than the other, and finally this hamster coin is almost dead. (It's okay to divert traffic, but it can't be like this...)
If you say it's a meme, the popularity of the token image is not high. If you say it's a game, then buying tokens is not a taker?
In the end, I just want an explanation.
See original
$DOGS Fortunately I didn't buy it. Otherwise it would be GG.
Seeing that it couldn't go up, I thought it would plummet.
However, I didn't sell the airdropped tokens just in case, so I lost a little.
Seeing that it couldn't go up, I thought it would plummet.
However, I didn't sell the airdropped tokens just in case, so I lost a little.
See original
$DOGS At present, this thing has already broken the issue price. According to the rules, it is easy to fall tenfold.
See original
Hong Kong is basically gone.
Hold various meetings, policy consultations, various web3 conferences, exhibition demonstrations, and exchanges.
Then everyone was excited. They submitted their application documents one after another. Some people even spread rumors that inland China would release a signal of lifting the ban.
We have finished what we should do. Finally, everyone in Hong Kong must give up users in mainland China.
There is basically no need to look at Hong Kong at the moment, and I guess this is what the above means.
You expect that your ETF trading volume will be lower than that of local dog markets that day and you want others to give up mainland users. To be honest, even if there are no mainland users, you don't have to do your Hong Kong market.
Then everyone was excited. They submitted their application documents one after another. Some people even spread rumors that inland China would release a signal of lifting the ban.
We have finished what we should do. Finally, everyone in Hong Kong must give up users in mainland China.
There is basically no need to look at Hong Kong at the moment, and I guess this is what the above means.
You expect that your ETF trading volume will be lower than that of local dog markets that day and you want others to give up mainland users. To be honest, even if there are no mainland users, you don't have to do your Hong Kong market.
See original
This can be reported now, right?
$msn #meson #mesonnetwork
1. Without the community’s consent, without informing the community, and without holding a vote, 5 million tokens were issued privately.
2. Follow up the internal test users, no matter how many test coins, the maximum is 10, the minimum is 7. They are deployed on eth, and even the handling fee is not enough.
3. They thought it was an eyesore, so they deleted the Chinese community on Discord. (In the early days, they limited one person to speak for an hour, but they couldn’t handle the scolding.)
1. Without the community’s consent, without informing the community, and without holding a vote, 5 million tokens were issued privately.
2. Follow up the internal test users, no matter how many test coins, the maximum is 10, the minimum is 7. They are deployed on eth, and even the handling fee is not enough.
3. They thought it was an eyesore, so they deleted the Chinese community on Discord. (In the early days, they limited one person to speak for an hour, but they couldn’t handle the scolding.)
Login to explore more contents