Regarding the airdrop on May 7th, many people said the official withdrew from Twitter, which I noticed immediately. I speculate that the official announcement was made too early, resulting in an error! Let's roughly analyze how much we can gain. By also has a staking event, distributing approximately 8.5 million tokens. Typically, these tokens are distributed through exchange promotional activities, which often waive listing fees. Binance is much larger than By, so I estimate they allocated around 12 million tokens for the airdrop. Based on the number of participants in recent TGE events, about 29,000 users can receive the airdrop, and the 7th is a small key point. Many people's scores were reset earlier, and this event also has a double trading volume activity, so let's make some rough estimates! The next event will probably have scores ranging from 115 to 135, distributed to about 30,000 to 40,000 users, with each user receiving around 300 to 400 tokens. Of course, this is a rough estimate, and the actual amount may be slightly less. Based on pre-market prices and private placement prices, the circulating supply is 92.64 million. The project team is quite strong, having raised over 25 million USD. I would guess that the market value is at least 50 million in circulation, or better yet, at least 100 million, with a single price ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 USD each. Therefore, the potential value of the airdrop is approximately 300×0.3=90🔪100🔪. Got it? That's about it. Everyone can also share their thoughts. Those who align with the official score thresholds and guess correctly, follow me for the next round and split 10🔪#币安Alpha上新 $ETH
According to the TGE news just released today, the Alpha threshold will be announced on May 7th. After preliminary calculation, it is estimated that 150 points will be required.
Sending Bitcoin red envelopes to my brothers, a total of ten thousand red envelopes. Happy Labor Day, wishing my brothers happiness beyond just Labor Day. Reply: Happy Automatically receive Bitcoin red envelope
The sign has depleted 100,000 USD. I feel that this opening price is really too high, pre-market price 0.04, basically doubled pre-market. Domestic market, new token, 90 million market cap, way beyond expectations. Now there are plenty of new tokens with a market cap of 30 million.
Many people think it will open like init. But you need to know the advantages of init: 1. The founder is Korean and is the R&D director of Luna. 2. Init launched with a 23,000% annualized LP return, and now it’s at 500%, many people buy tokens to form LP, and the tokens can also receive airdrops from sub-chain projects. 3. Init had Korean KOLs promoting it at launch.
What does this sign have? Relying on Chinese KOLs? Most domestic markets are peak at opening, GPS is an example, and both Binance and OKEx have invested.
The sign has depleted 100,000 USD. I feel that this opening price is really too high, pre-market price 0.04, basically doubled pre-market. Domestic market, new token, 90 million market cap, way beyond expectations. Now there are plenty of new tokens with a market cap of 30 million.
Many people think it will open like init. But you need to know the advantages of init: 1. The founder is Korean and is the R&D director of Luna. 2. Init launched with a 23,000% annualized LP return, and now it’s at 500%, many people buy tokens to form LP, and the tokens can also receive airdrops from sub-chain projects. 3. Init had Korean KOLs promoting it at launch.
What does this sign have? Relying on Chinese KOLs? Most domestic markets are peak at opening, GPS is an example, and both Binance and OKEx have invested.
The circulating market value is only 40 million dollars, which is definitely considered a cheap asset among new projects on Binance.
Behind it is the blockchain abstract infrastructure, paired with the practical implementation of UniversalX, which has both revenue and users; theoretically, this setup is not bad.
UniversalX is not just a showpiece either; as an on-chain tool, the experience is decent, and it fits well within the current narrative trend.
The founder of the project is even fully committed, personally stepping in to buy the dip, reportedly increasing his position by over 1 million dollars.
But—these all sound great, yet the actual market is completely dismissive.
To be honest, sometimes you wonder, what exactly is determining the price? Fundamentals? Technology? Narratives? Or is it just one word: manipulation.
So now I just want to ask one question: when will I be able to break even??? #MichaelSaylor暗示增持BTC #巨鲸动向 #币安投票上币
eos and eth have applications, but the price still doesn't rise. In contrast, meme coins can quickly surge with just a phrase or a small narrative. Talking about applications in the crypto world is useless; it's better to hype, since it's all just a bubble anyway.
强势之剑
--
$PARTI It is said that this coin is trash, but I will still recommend it because not many people go back to do research.
This coin was indeed born at the wrong time, but it cannot be denied that this coin has certain applications, and it is definitely much better than a worthless coin.
When a market crash occurs, no single snowflake ❄️ is innocent, but you cannot deny that this project has a team that gets things done.
The price is determined by the actions of market makers, and is related to the development of the project itself and the overall market conditions.
If this coin were to perform well, I conservatively estimate it could reach $1. The market is just learning about the product.
When the market is not doing well, that is when the quality of a project is truly tested. #风险回报比