$ALPACA has already asked, it is an issue with the project party and has nothing to do with the platform. To translate, it's the platform handing the sickle to the project party, it is the project party that is cutting you, not the platform.
How does one view Ethereum? It seems there is a significant divide among people now. Some die-hard fans believe that Ethereum is failing and cannot compete with many current narratives; they think it will gradually decline until it is completely replaced. Actually, before the last bull market, there were also many doubts about Ethereum. When Ethereum dropped to $80, there were not many who dared to buy the dip; most felt that Ethereum was finished. However, Ethereum maintained its position as the second largest. When Ethereum was at $2000, the Ethereum Beacon Chain was booming, and there were doubts whether it could surge again. Ultimately, during the last bull market, Ethereum set its peak around $5000. So, although Ethereum's current performance is not strong, this is simply because the bull market has not arrived yet. When the bull market comes, external funds will favor Bitcoin and Ethereum more, and at that time, Ethereum will soar.
#以太坊的未来 It seems that it is no longer possible to buy Ethereum at 1600, and it may not be possible to buy Ethereum at 1800 next week. Next month, it may not be possible to buy ETH below 2000.
One can only say that Ethereum started early, covering a wider range of aspects, but its actual value is becoming less and less viable. Even Vitalik dared to take on miners back in the day; it might be better to take on layer 2 instead 🙂↔️
奔跑财经-FinaceRun
--
Charles Hoskinson Warns: Ethereum May Not Survive in the Next Decade
Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, recently raised serious doubts about the future of Ethereum during a recent "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) session.
As one of the co-founders of Ethereum, Charles Hoskinson bluntly stated that despite Ethereum's current leading total value locked (TVL), it may face the risk of extinction within 10-15 years.
He pointed out three structural problems with Ethereum: a flawed accounting model, problematic virtual machine, and a weak consensus mechanism. These fundamental issues are gradually undermining the foundation of this blockchain giant.
He also specifically criticized the direction of Ethereum Layer 2 solutions, comparing these second-layer scalability networks to "parasites," believing they not only fail to truly address Ethereum's scalability issues but also continuously siphon value away from the mainnet.
In his view, this development model will ultimately lead to a value competition within the ecosystem, making it increasingly difficult for Ethereum to maintain the coordinated operation of the entire network.
Hoskinson further likened Ethereum's situation to that of former tech giants Myspace and Blackberry, stating that these early innovators eventually collapsed due to competition and mismanagement, implying that Ethereum may face a similar fate.
Hoskinson's remarks have caused a stir in the crypto community, with supporters arguing that they accurately highlight the real challenges Ethereum faces. Layer 2 networks are diluting mainnet value, high gas fees continue to trouble users, and persistent regulatory uncertainty exists. More critically, compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum's popularity among institutional investors is significantly lower.
However, there are also many observers who oppose this view, pointing out that Ethereum's upcoming Pectra and Fusaka upgrades are expected to significantly improve network performance. Moreover, the recent rebound of ETH price from $1500 to a peak of $1815 seems to indicate that this established public chain still has vitality.
In summary, the current controversy is not only focused on Ethereum's future fate but also prompts the industry to rethink the fundamental logic of blockchain technology development. As the history of the internet shows, the ultimate winners are not specific technologies but the mindsets that can continually innovate amid change.
What's wrong with An An! Is it a reversal of fortunes? Now it's off the shelves and becomes advantageous, on the shelves and becomes empty? Who could have thought that $ALPACA was just officially announced to be taken off the shelves, and then it skyrocketed by 84%, What's up! If you don't buy now, will you never be able to buy it again?
Lunc is not even being monitored, the reason is the same 🙂↔️
龙头交易员
--
The delisting table for $FTT is out again. I have said before that no matter how many times you vote for the delisting, FTT will not be delisted, because Binance is the third largest shareholder of FTT. Many people didn't believe this, but now they do, right? Hahaha
Binance will delist ALPACA, PDA, VIB, WING (2025-05-02)
This is a routine announcement, and the products and services involved may not apply to your region. Dear users: Binance will regularly review the digital assets listed to ensure a high standard of token quality. When a token no longer meets the listing criteria or there are significant changes in the industry environment, we will conduct an in-depth project review and may delist it. Binance has always valued user experience and continues to adapt to changes in the market environment, with the utmost priority on protecting users. During the review process, we will consider various factors. The following are the latest indicators influencing our decision to delist digital assets: