Mike_D
🙊还在试图建立属于自己的思维框架🙉还在试图实现认知落地和知行合一🙈还在试图学会将成就完美自己的兴趣转化为对于客观事物的兴趣｜Weibo: Mike_D｜Twitter @mike_d1213 | VP of Operation & Co-founder of @Daren_Market
2 Following
66 Followers
542 Liked
42 Shared
Posts
See original
The value of review
Chatting with a friend, he said he learned a lot from many of my thinking models because I had read a lot of books.
I dispute this view. Let’s call some of the small ideas I have known as mental models. I don’t think these come from books. Books are just a way to obtain information. If reading is compared to fishing, how many fish you can catch depends on the net, which is the information screening system + past practical experience.
I think some of my unique ideas are mainly derived from review.
If there is one thing that I have been practicing, it is really "I examine myself three times a day." Every time I get a small piece of feedback, I always reflect on why I made the decision I did just now, where the strong psychological fear comes from, and am I trying to help others or am I secretly happy for myself? etc
I dispute this view. Let’s call some of the small ideas I have known as mental models. I don’t think these come from books. Books are just a way to obtain information. If reading is compared to fishing, how many fish you can catch depends on the net, which is the information screening system + past practical experience.
I think some of my unique ideas are mainly derived from review.
If there is one thing that I have been practicing, it is really "I examine myself three times a day." Every time I get a small piece of feedback, I always reflect on why I made the decision I did just now, where the strong psychological fear comes from, and am I trying to help others or am I secretly happy for myself? etc
See original
Some people see problems only as difficulties
See original
You treat a person well a thousand times, but once you treat him badly, he will think you are an unreasonable fool.
You are wrong a thousand times to a person, but once you are right, he will think you are a saint reincarnated in Lingtan.
People always assign more weight to the latest facts, but there is no prior priority between things at different times.
People are accustomed to judging the quality of a strategy based on the latest investment return, and they are always angry with their close friends.
This is stupid.
You are wrong a thousand times to a person, but once you are right, he will think you are a saint reincarnated in Lingtan.
People always assign more weight to the latest facts, but there is no prior priority between things at different times.
People are accustomed to judging the quality of a strategy based on the latest investment return, and they are always angry with their close friends.
This is stupid.
See original
Don't be too eager to get answers.
If you are eager to get the answer, you always want to get the answer from others.
But the real answer can only be found by yourself.
If you are eager to get the answer, you always want to get the answer from others.
But the real answer can only be found by yourself.
See original
Principles of the information filtering system that you apply to yourself (dynamically updated, welcome to add):
1/Only give the conclusion, not the content of the process logic, which can be blocked
2/ Only conclusions are given, and content that uses non-systematic cases as arguments can be blocked.
3/ Ignore the complex system itself and like to analyze some problems that are too grand to have any application value. You can block them (eg. Is reading meaningful for success/making money/investment?)
4/ If you like to use authoritative labels such as number of fans, x years of experience, titles, historical success data, etc. instead of factual logic to prove that your content is worth watching, you don’t have to watch it.
5/You don’t have to read any conclusions that predict the future (but the arguments may be valuable)
2/ Only conclusions are given, and content that uses non-systematic cases as arguments can be blocked.
3/ Ignore the complex system itself and like to analyze some problems that are too grand to have any application value. You can block them (eg. Is reading meaningful for success/making money/investment?)
4/ If you like to use authoritative labels such as number of fans, x years of experience, titles, historical success data, etc. instead of factual logic to prove that your content is worth watching, you don’t have to watch it.
5/You don’t have to read any conclusions that predict the future (but the arguments may be valuable)
See original
People do things for a reason, but not necessarily for a reason.
It’s okay not to do it if there’s no reason for it, but don’t look for excuses.
It’s okay not to do it if there’s no reason for it, but don’t look for excuses.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
TrumpTariffs
67.5M views
91,459 Discussing
According to Jinshi Data, President Trump announced plans to impose additional tariffs on countries that tax U.S. exports. He also stated that Congress is close to passing the largest tax cut bill in U.S. history, calling it a “rocket” for the U.S. economy. The combination of tax cuts and new trade measures could lead to stronger domestic growth and investor confidence—but may also introduce global trade uncertainty and inflationary risks.
💬 Do you think these policies will boost markets, or trigger more global volatility? How do you see this impacting crypto and broader risk assets?
👉 Create a post with #TrumpTariffs or the $BTC cashtag, or share your trader’s profile and insights to earn Binance points!
(Press the “+” on the App homepage and click on Task Center)
Activity period: 2025-05-14 06:00 (UTC) to 2025-05-15 06:00 (UTC)
Points rewards are first-come, first-served, so be sure to claim your points daily!
Binance Square Official
197 Likes
62.5k views
MarketPullback
116.3M views
108,559 Discussing
ETHMarketWatch
4.5M views
6,294 Discussing
