小白新人带下

I am even considering a question, that is, retail investors think that the points consumption system is beneficial to large investors, and now the scores of medium and large investors have already exceeded 186 points. Of course, the scores in the raid activities are relatively high, which is understandable. But have retail investors ever thought that if the points consumption system doesn’t come out, looking at this 186, you won't be able to catch up with the scores, let alone players with 200 points. Some people have now rolled up to a trading volume of 20,000, the BSC chain transaction fees have decreased, liquidity has increased, wear and tear has decreased, coupled with the BSC chain's double trading volume activity. Do you retail investors think you can catch up with others later? Even the minimum guarantee is at least 12+2, and if we follow the previous point system, it means leading all the time. Many retail investors at the back are just running along. Do you think you can still earn points? Under the points consumption system, if the points threshold is not high, you can consume it twice a month. The first time you consume it, you can at least break even with the transaction fees and earn a little profit, and the other time would be considered profit. You need to think of it this way.

The Alpha Sector Points Airdrop Activity is intended as a benefit to promote the activity level of the Alpha Sector, allowing players who enjoy playing 'dog coins' to receive some benefits. However, you have rigidly interpreted it as points mining. The points consumption system can reduce bubbles and is more favorable for long-term development, rather than just a short-term play. As a result, for a project party with a limited amount of tokens, if many players enter, the share for retail investors becomes smaller. Conversely, if there are fewer players entering the same project party's tokens, retail investors will receive a larger share of the cake. We must also consider the project's overall vision, as funding allows retail investors to research the intrinsic value of the tokens. This points consumption system is a voluntary choice; I believe there will be significant and minor benefits, similar to the difference between a popular rice dish and hot pot. However, this points consumption system will be beneficial for the long-term development of the Alpha Sector. I support the platform’s decision, which has been planned thoughtfully by several planners and the community. If we don't use the points consumption system, and later the average basic income per person exceeds 10 points, the profits will gradually decrease. The cake from the same project party remains unchanged, but if there are more players with over 150 points, will it still hold value? 😂 Does it still make sense for you to compete? With the introduction of the points consumption system, I even believe that in any future round where there are many entrants for the project party's tokens, the transaction fees will outweigh the gains. In rounds with fewer entrants, the gains will exceed the transaction fees. Because the cake from the project party is limited, the total amount of benefits distributed should be fixed. However, during the first phase of the points consumption system, the scores may not be too high, and it might even backtrack to accommodate players. At that time, let's first observe how the new sector unfolds for us retail investors.

This time, the Alpha point consumption system has retail investors optimistic about the token model that allows for free selection of project parties. This means that if there are many players entering a certain project's tokens and the project's positioning is not high, it could lead to poor returns, which is to say, in some cases, the wear and tear is greater than the returns. Conversely, if a project has a high positioning and there are few players entering, then the retail investors will get a larger share of the pie, resulting in periods where returns far exceed wear and tear. I believe this free game-theory mode can encourage project parties to put in effort to capture the traffic market by working hard on their token projects rather than slacking off. Retail investors can also be incentivized to sharpen their vision when engaging with lesser-known tokens. Additionally, the point consumption system can help dissipate some market bubbles, reducing selling pressure in the market. I think the Alpha point consumption system should be feasible. However, these are just discussions among retail investors for reference. The specific planning of the point consumption system will still depend on the announcement regarding the Alpha section's point consumption system on the 13th. I believe the Alpha section can take off.

Tomorrow the Alpha sector point consumption system will be released, let's see if we can take off a wave, brothers.

My small retail investor is at the limit of 170 points, and I can't really push any further, retail investor 10+1, at most 2048 levels 11+1, compared to others, big investors are at least 12+2, I really can't compete with them, there are many above 180 points. 😂 Still, the 1024 level has a better cost-performance ratio. Seeing the point consumption system for the 13th come out, the cake shouldn't all be concentrated with that one wave of leading players, although their wear costs are also higher.

Why do we say that after the points consumption system is implemented, retail investors should cherish every single point? Because the activities in the Alpha sector are basically big fish activities, which truly provide profits to retail investors. For small retail investors, $100 is actually considered a good profit. I usually spend only 1500 yuan a month 😂, but if we look at the Alpha activities, most of them offer more profits. However, there are also some that are not very valuable, like GM and DOLO. DOLO seems to be worth a few dozen dollars, but some players say that the transaction fee is 20 USDT on the Ethereum chain 🤣. GM is probably only around 130 yuan, which barely counts as a big fish activity, but compared to several other tokens, it feels less valuable. After the points consumption system is established, each project's token endorsement, layout, and funding are different, so I think retail investors should analyze which project's token is more meaningful. This actually encourages project parties to be more diligent in their activities and not slack off, which indirectly promotes competition among project parties. Regardless of whether you are a medium or large investor, the token price may rise, or if you just want to earn a few hundred bucks, you can choose how to approach it. With the points consumption system in place, the subsequent tokens will be divided among several groups of players, and there won't be so many points available to grab. Project parties will pay more attention to increase the value of this Alpha token in order to capture that traffic. From this perspective, it is a win-win situation. Some retail investors say, 'Why did I just spend over 100 USDT to catch up, and now there's a points consumption system?' The points sector also needs to adjust with market sentiment. At this time, retail investors have an average of over 150 points, and it has already been an internal competition for two periods, 15 days each. If each period is based on 150 points, and you all have over 150 points, then is it still valuable? Won't the market just collapse under your pressure? Therefore, as the average points of market players exceed 150, the points consumption system in the Alpha sector also has its rationale. In short, there is competition among players, and in the cryptocurrency world, profits and losses are borne by oneself. Retail investors also need to act within their means.

I'm thinking about a question regarding the points consumption system that has been introduced. Do small investors still need to compete for the 2048 tier, or should they wait a few days and continue with the 1024 tier? Small investors can argue their own position on which tier to consume in. Currently, I am also primarily at the 1024 tier, and I personally feel that the wear and tear at the 2048 tier might be higher. I think the small investors entering later will find the 1024 tier sufficient, because the points consumption system that will be introduced later shouldn't have the same issue as before, where a few dominant players would monopolize the benefits and others would be unable to catch up. However, I think the planning team has also recognized the polarization from before, and the points system they are implementing later is actually intended to create a balance, especially under the two strategies of sending points based on the last few digits above a certain threshold and the 150-point rides for picking people up. The points system has become much more balanced. Therefore, regarding the points consumption system introduced on the 13th, even though it seems to offer more cost-effectiveness for later entrants, at least passive players can still benefit if they have enough points. I still don't know exactly what the points consumption system on the 13th will look like. However, the points have started to retain their value, and small investors should cherish each point as a valuable asset, using these points to acquire tokens. Thus, choosing the right project tokens requires a unique and sharp insight to maximize returns.

Another point is that starting from the 13th, there will be a points consumption system. Personally, I feel that those with high scores shouldn't always be able to benefit from every wave. However, they have high wear and tear and more points, so they can enjoy it a few more times. This is a case of more work, more rewards, but it seems somewhat justifiable. From the perspective of retail investors, it can be said that our points are consumed once they are redeemed. Retail investors need a buffer period for their points to catch up. In this case, I believe that choosing the project party becomes very important, as there will be selectivity in the future. Therefore, the value of the tokens from the project party, Alpha, depends on the individual judgment of retail investors. The tokens from the project parties can be of varying quality, but those that can appear in the Alpha segment are likely chosen by BA analysts. Similarly, among the project party currencies in the Alpha segment, the value of which token is higher depends on the project's vision, the emotional state of market players regarding the token, whether the sentiment is positive or negative. The influx of capital and large players into the project party's tokens also affects the market of that token. Personally, I think that after the points consumption system in Alpha, choosing which project party's token to invest in might reflect a model where quantitative changes lead to qualitative changes, demanding a higher level of judgment from retail investors. Of course, these are just for reference. The specific points consumption system for the Alpha segment has not yet been released; everything will be based on the official announcement. We retail investors can discuss the Alpha points consumption system and play around with it. I wonder whether the points in the future will be more stable, or if they will depreciate or appreciate. I believe that the points should be, and I think they will be more stable.

The transaction fees on the BSC chain seem to have dropped quite a bit. It seems that using Alpha points to be active has become worthwhile, especially with the current double transaction volume promotion on the BSC chain. I think the cost-performance ratio has surpassed that of the SOL chain. Another point is, have you noticed that the cost-performance ratio of trading SOL chain points is not as high as it was in the previous days? The transaction fees on the SOL chain have also increased a little, and I'm not sure if they have gone up a bit. Some players say that the liquidity on the SOL chain is not as high as it was during the initial hype. Additionally, the previous SOL chain KO has already gone live, and I noticed that the wear and tear seemed quite low.

The planning of the Alpha sector is truly a genius plan that has understood human nature, realizing it clearly. The wave after wave of wealth effect has brought countless retail investors into the market. I entered during the four wallet staking activities, which are boun, lisalta, solv, and ker. The earliest players called this kind of traffic diversion activity or welfare activity, and it can barely be considered a big deal, with about 200 yuan in profit, allowing many players to get to know the cryptocurrency circle, including myself as a retail investor. The remarkable aspect of the Alpha sector is that it has brought back old players and boosted the meme coin sector. In the first year, I also struggled with meme coins; the complexity of different chains made it difficult to play with meme coins. The Alpha sector simplified the process of engaging with meme coins and spot trading, bringing in newcomers like us who are not very active in the crypto circle, while veteran players had already started to lay out their positions. It even attracted players from outside the circle, such as stay-at-home moms, delivery workers, and part-timers. I believe the planning of the Alpha sector has grasped human nature; human nature is largely selfish and greedy, with few possessing saintly characteristics. I think this is human nature, and we shouldn't blame it; personal development may lead to different personalities. It's like when you take a bus; before the bus starts, you hope everyone can board equally, but once you’re on the bus, you want the driver to start quickly so you can reach your destination sooner. This is because the people on the bus and those off the bus have different positions. Of course, human nature also has many bright sides, but overall, selfishness and greed are not sins. Sometimes it’s just a matter of differing positions; you shouldn't blame others. Just like high-scoring players, those who lead with high scores would love for their scores to be higher, as the more they can divide the cake, the more they benefit. I believe that this kind of wealthy effect, where there are more wolves than meat, is needed. Meanwhile, those with lower scores hope for an opportunity to enter as well. Therefore, in order to achieve this balance, the planner has transformed the Alpha sector's points into a consumption system. Whether it benefits major players or retail investors depends on the level of competition among players and should be determined by the market. However, I feel that the consumption points system introduced on the 13th will be an opportunity for retail investors with lower scores. Whether it is Hai Di Lao or pig trotter rice will depend on the market. At least I think it is fairly considerate towards the lagging retail investors.

The point consumption system starting on the 13th is also a market opportunity. Whether it's big profits or small profits, hot pot or pork trotter rice, as retail investors, I think we should not make decisions in advance; we will let the market decide. We will follow the market as long as the players can sustain. I believe that the new point consumption system in the Alpha sector is beneficial for retail investors, especially for those entering the market later. In the new consumption points sector, because of the previous high scores' consumption points, there won't be a consistent lead; it can only be said that in this 15-day cycle, those who are behind will always be behind. The specific planning for the point consumption on the 13th will depend on the planners' decisions. I think this consumption points sector is beneficial for retail investors who are behind in points; they will always get a wave, right? Even if it's just the basic guarantee, it's still a wave, isn't it? But will it become more competitive? Whether it's big profits or small profits, hot pot or pork trotter rice, these depend on the degree of competition among retail investors. After all, big data is here, right? I think the several project parties that have launched new currencies in these recent phases still have a decent outlook.

Small retail investors scored 166 points, saying that over 150 points is considered high for inactive players. I, as a retail investor, only invested a little over 100 USD. The first 15-day cycle was for sharp-minded players who knew how much money was spent on promoting the Alpha section. They are considered sharp players because the first cycle was an unannounced surprise event. I, as a novice, thought there would be an announcement, and later assumed there wouldn’t be as many events. I really wanted to slap myself for missing the chance when the earliest trades were over 1 USD and they gave out 100 USD. The second 15-day cycle can be described as the early bird catching the worm; they even released the event announcement in advance, allowing us to participate in whatever we wanted, whether it was the Alpha section or just being active in trading. Like most retail investors, I also wanted to make money. In the second 15-day cycle, I had daily transactions of 512, 1024, with deposits typical for retail investors being around 100 USD. 9+1, 10+1, 15 times 10, 15 times 11, even the daily minimum activity for retail investors in the Alpha section was above 150 points. If we consider the first 15 days, if your mind and vision aren’t as sharp as those old players, then the second cycle of 15 days can be seen as an open giveaway event. This is essentially handing you money; if you still can’t reach 150 points, it indicates that you haven’t been actively engaging in the Alpha section. Retail investors express their feelings in thousands of words; the BA platform and project parties have been strategic in recent cycles, giving high scores as a norm and low scores based on the tail numbers. Although low scores still require a tail number of several points above, it can be said that they’ve done their best to take care of retail investors. Later, a new consumption points mechanism was introduced; while this mode requires a certain number of points to claim, it also provides opportunities for later players to enter the market. Market opportunities are serendipitous, and seizing the market is a reward. In the first 15 days, I believe it relied on the sharpness of old players; in the second 15 days, I believe it relied on the early bird catching the worm and the open event. The third 15 days, starting from the 13th, introduces the consumption points model, which also provides market opportunities for retail investors. Whether the BA exchange has a big pattern, you decide. Although the Alpha section is also a place where many wolves compete for few sheep, the wealth effect is necessary for players. If it really gives away for an average of over 10 points, then is this currency still valuable? The 28 law of the market will not change. Although I’m a newcomer still learning how to play contracts, this is a perspective from a small retail investor who has just entered the cryptocurrency circle, for reference only.

Fortunately, I believed in the Alpha sector's points system. During the first bonus period, I saw many people in the group becoming wealthy due to the effect of profits. As a novice in the crypto space, I didn't participate much, but when I saw others making over 100 dollars in profit, I asked various experts in the group how to play in the crypto world. That's how I entered the Alpha sector. At that time, some retail investors also reaped profits from the first phase, where the profit was substantial, cycling every 15 days, with only Dolo and Game having lower profits; the rest were significant. We retail investors always thought the bonus period was over, but they were given rewards as long as they had traded at least 1 dollar initially. As someone who entered in the second wave, I initially gained nothing and even lost several dozen dollars in fees. However, I believed that the Alpha sector, which had invested so much in promotion, wouldn't just be a one-time thing. So, I bravely entered the Alpha sector in the second phase. Initially, I also lost several dozen in fees and was envious of those in the first phase who had enough points to keep eating profits. But many retail investors in the group who took profits started to become complacent, thinking that they could just stop trading and believed that the bonus period was over. However, I felt that the promotion of the Alpha sector by BA wouldn't just be a one-time thing. BA, being one of the top three exchanges globally, wouldn't have such a limited vision, and as a small retail investor with a capital of 100 dollars, I quietly pursued it, and finally enjoyed the benefits of the second phase's 15-day cycle. I was moved to tears. Because this points system, from my perspective as a retail investor, felt like a sign-in system, where you sign in every 15 days for a cycle. With many wolves and little meat, if you don't trade one day, catching up afterwards would require trading tens of thousands of USDT; the exponential growth isn't easy to catch up to. Therefore, it encourages active users in the Alpha sector. Even if some retail investors say they are cautious with the 'dog' projects and only play short-term, that's acceptable as long as there are active users. This includes the newly launched S currency chain, which also requires active users. As long as you earn 10 points a day, you have a guaranteed minimum; if you sign in for 15 days, it's also given to you. However, I noticed that starting from the 13th, a points consumption system was implemented, meaning that each time you redeem, you must consume a wave of points, giving later entrants even more opportunities to receive bonuses than those of us who entered in the second phase. I believe the Alpha sector has a vision, and the project team has already shared part of the profits with retail investors.

The transaction fee on this Ethereum chain is $20. Wow, as a small retail investor, I'm doing great 6666😂😂😂. But it's okay, it seems that trading Solana was cheaper a few days ago, and the BSC chain is a bit more expensive, but later on, I saw that there was a May Day event where BSC chain had points counted as double trading volume. However, this $20 fee on the Ethereum chain is indeed a bit pricey. So should small retail investors sell off their OB coins on this Ethereum chain or continue to be bullish? But small retail investors need to have a grateful heart; even if you take profits from selling off, you can't blame the OB project team, because the fees on the Ethereum chain have always been somewhat high. Let's see if the fees can drop a bit; even if you, as a small retail investor, don't have the capital of large or medium investors, we still need to acknowledge that this time the situation is indeed significant. This Alpha sector can be said to be very powerful; it has really activated the retail investors in the crypto space, many people who usually don't participate have entered the market, which has truly provided profits to retail investors. However, it's like a check-in system where you get 10 points a day; you can't fall behind. If you miss a day of trading, you won't accumulate enough points. In fact, in my personal opinion, the recent events are focusing on retail investors who have checked in for full attendance for 15 days. If you trade less for a day, you'll have to trade over $10,000 later, which is quite a high cost for retail investors. Once again, I want to emphasize that the situation promoted by BA in this Alpha sector is indeed very high.

I, as a retail investor in the cryptocurrency market, can only play with spot trading; I can't handle contracts.

Some of our latecomer retail investors have lost a lot on transaction fees. The earlier retail investors are rolling in riches because they followed the main trend. But I won't say much; who told me not to trade the popular coins earlier? I, as a retail investor, also know the saying that the market is always right and that retail investors bear their own profits and losses. We latecomer retail investors have lost 30 to 40 dollars in fees, and I haven't earned a thing, just couldn't catch up. However, there should be a wealth effect in the cryptocurrency circle. I wonder if the later arrivals can get a little profit too. I also don't know if there will still be profits in the future activities.