A few days ago, $Jager said that the project party stealing money was delivering goods, and sure enough, faith has slowly disappeared, such a good project has been ruined by the money-stealing project party.
A new statement from $Jager has just been released. Jager has released a new statement. Jager's latest statement is now published. Jager's new statement has been announced.
$Jager After reading Wang Dayou's tweets, I realized that Ji'er is a purely Chinese-run scheme run by a Singaporean-Chinese, a Malaysian-Chinese, and a Fujianese. Wang Dayou accused the two individuals of stealing dividends and being expert at running a one-shot operation, profiting off and then starting the next one. While Wang Dayou's past drug abuse has significantly damaged his credibility, many of the timings he cited are accurate. So, at this point, it seems the two individuals are definitely not good, while Wang Dayou is considered a half-good person.
In the end, it all comes back to the core of any cryptocurrency project: decentralization. Currently, Ji'er has two core functions: burning and dividends. We, as token holders, don't care about the project's infighting. What we care about is whether burning and dividends can continue to operate automatically even if the project is wiped out. Or, like Bitcoin, whether the community can fix bugs on its own, or whether burning and dividends rely solely on the survival of the project's members.
In summary, we must make the project party hand over the sole control of the destruction dividend contract. Only with these two completely decentralized Jagers will there be a future. Otherwise, the project party will always be in trouble!
If the rhythm is right, it works; if the rhythm is wrong, you lose everything.
Ar-凌志
--
In this round of the Ethereum bull market, the old methods should have been thrown into the trash long ago.
How simple were the markets in 21 and 23? Just holding onto your chips with your eyes closed was enough; time was the strongest moat. Back then, altcoins were skyrocketing like crazy, with tripling or quintupling considered conservative; the market was like a runaway train, and as long as you dared to get on, you could share in the gains. It wasn't about operations; it was about whether you could endure.
But this time, it’s a completely different logic. On the surface, every sector seems bustling, but it's all a setup orchestrated by big players—today, the AI concept can be sizzling hot, and tomorrow it might be the public chains flipping the table. If you're a little slow, by the time you enter, the main uptrend may have already run its course, and you might even get knocked back to square one by a sudden drop. Even if you're lucky enough to make some profits, a moment of inattention could see you give it all back to the market. The speed at which the main players jump between sectors has increased significantly; retail investors' reaction time has essentially been compressed to zero.
So this time, I've completely changed my strategy: the core targets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB remain stable, and I absolutely won't stubbornly cling to any single altcoin, nor will I fantasize about lying down until the end of the bull market. Instead, I've shifted to flexibly navigating through various hotspots, making short trades, and quickly pocketing profits; when there's a pullback, I'll wait for the right opportunity to jump back in. It looks conservative, but in reality, I'm moving in sync with the market's rhythm. This bull market is fundamentally about who can stay at the table the longest, not who is more patient.
My core principle this time is just one word: survive. Survive, and you have the right to wait for the next wave of opportunities; survive, and you can gradually accumulate your chips in the game. In the end, when the accounts are settled, I may not be the one who made the most, but I will definitely be the one who never got kicked out.