The crypto community is on fire with speculation: could $BOB be gearing up for a legendary supply shock?
One wallet controls a staggering 64% of the supply — an enormous concentration in a single address. But the latest chatter suggests this mountain of tokens might be headed straight for the burn pit.
If true, it would:
⚡ Instantly slash supply 💎 Boost scarcity 🚀 Position $BOB for a next-level rally
Scarcity fuels momentum — and a burn of this magnitude could be the fuse that ignites the ultimate BOOM → MOON run.
Right now, whales, traders, and retail eyes are locked on $BOB {alpha}(560x51363f073b1e4920fda7aa9e9d84ba97ede1560e) : will this spark a new destiny, or fade as just another rumor?
🔥 One thing’s clear — the “bonfire buzz” has already become one of the hottest stories in crypto. Stay tuned… history could be written in flames. #Bob #CryptoIntegration
🚨 The Big Truth About $BOB – No One Wants to Say It, So I Will 🚨
Let’s cut the noise and talk FACTS:
1️⃣ $BOB is NOT from Binance. 2️⃣ It was launched on BSC, yes, but that’s like saying your microwave is from NASA because it uses electricity. 3️⃣ The devs? GONE. Ghosted. Abandoned ship. 4️⃣ No spot listing. Ever. Stop dreaming. 5️⃣ The supply? Absurd. Trillions on trillions — the classic bait of every meme rug since 2017. 6️⃣ Mark my words: this will be the biggest flop of the cycle. 7️⃣ “It was made by Binance’s marketing team” – this is pure hopium from bagholders trying to justify throwing rent money into a meme with no pulse. It’s also illegal. Employees can’t just whip up tokens.
💡 You want to actually invest? Wait for the cycle to cool. Then pick up ETH, BTC, XRP, SOL – the real foundations.
If you're buying 2 trillion tokens for $10, that's not a jackpot. That’s a lesson incoming. 📉
I’ll be back soon with more receipts. Until then: DYOR. Stay smart. Don’t get played.
$BOB Decentralized mental psychology. The Web3 era is the era of freedom and digital technology democracy. Digital money existed even before Bitcoin was born. I remember the scandal of a digital payment system called Liberty Reserve back then, I was still in high senior school, and I was already excited about technology at the time. So many users were harmed, and the owner was prosecuted in court. At that time, I was very enthusiastic about HYIP programs based on investments with daily and monthly profits using a payment system called Liberty Reserve, all of that was centralized.
That’s how dangerous centralization can be. When a server shuts down, everyone loses access. But once again, decentralized blockchain does not work like that. Even when a blockchain explorer website is down, the blockchain continues to operate as usual.
The mission of Build On BNB will soon go global. I am not talking specifically about $BOB , but BOB is carrying the Build On BNB mission even if it is just a meme. There is nothing wrong, decentralization does not depend on the type of crypto, but on the system and the mission, and that is what holds value. Crypto becomes worthless without a mission. Bitcoin has value because it pioneered the principle of decentralization. Aligned with the Build On BNB mission, I guarantee that many meme projects, whether they want to or not, will have to follow this trend; otherwise, they will soon be left behind.
About Binance X post 1 hour ago. Is there anything most relevant besides $BOB ? Build ON BNB is the main mission $BOB {alpha}(560x51363f073b1e4920fda7aa9e9d84ba97ede1560e)
🚨 Official Clarification: Debunking the "$Jager OnlyOwner" FUD 🔥💎
Recent claims by "the EXO Girl" and others suggest $JAGER hasn’t renounced contract ownership because BscScan shows "OnlyOwner" functions. This is false. Here’s the technical truth, simplified:
🔍 1. What "OnlyOwner" Actually Means - It’s a code label restricting certain functions to the contract owner. - After renouncing ownership, the owner address is set to `0x000...dead` (a null "burner" address). - **Result: No one can ever access "OnlyOwner" functions. The key is destroyed. 🔑🔥
✅ 2. Proof $JAGER Ownership Is Renounced - Check BscScan yourself: Under "Read Contract," the owner address is `0x000...dead`. - Verified by: Bitget Academy, Dextools, and top security auditors. - Reality: Zero control exists. The code is immutable.
🛡️ 3. Why This Matters for Holders -✅ 100% Security: No entity can alter fees, taxes, or liquidity. - ✅ True Decentralization: Burns, rewards, and allocations run autonomously. - ✅ Trustless System: Your assets are protected by math, not humans.
Bottom Line 💎 "OnlyOwner" in code is legacy text — not active control. $JAGER is fully community-owned, with a dead owner address ensuring zero manipulation risk. Ignore the noise. Verify on-chain.
Don’t try to intimidate me with any lies claiming that $BOB can be manipulated. The one you’re dealing with is a woman. A woman will never lose a debate with a man.
I have expertise in programming Laravel, Flutter, Python, Node.js. I have even built 4 mobile apps startup in my country that can be downloaded on the Play Store and App Store. I graduated from college with a final thesis on blockchain. I wouldn’t have graduated if my thesis had not been completed.
If you ask Binance support whether $BOB is truly a Binance project, the customer support team will definitely answer “No.”
Then why did the BOB futures listing announcement clearly state that BOB is a Binance internal project? If BOB is not a Binance project, does that mean the announcement during the BOB futures listing was a lie from Binance? Oh my BOB, how could you say Binance is a fraud? That is impossible. Binance is the largest crypto exchange in the world. It is impossible for Binance to say something that is not true.
Do you think Binance interns are not part of Binance? Oh my BOB, how could interns not be part of Binance?
If you think Binance interns are a separate entity from Binance, then who is the CEO of Binance interns? Oh my BOB, it makes no sense if Binance interns are a different company from Binance, that’s ridiculous, hahaha, lol.
Why does the support team say BOB is not a Binance project? Because the support team is a separate department from the team handling Binance projects. It is impossible for the support team to know exactly all of Binance projects. The support team works only to handle user account issues, user-related fraud, and all matters related to user accounts. The support team does not manage Binance products or projects. They are a separate part of the organization. Binance support is not like a McDonald’s cashier who can serve you at the register while also preparing your order at the same time.
@CokeFriesNugget sorry my friend. Do not say that the $BOB project is a scam. Because if you say BOB is a scam, it is the same as saying Binance is a scam. My report will not take long to be processed by Binance.
$BOB is a Binance project. So I am showing this as proof that Binance is moving behind me to support the Build On BNB movement.
If you don’t believe it, go ahead and strike back. Report all my previous posts about BOB. I guarantee 100% that your report will be immediately rejected by Binance. Because BOB is a Binance-owned project, Binance will certainly reject any claim that BOB is a scam or fraud.
Bitcoin journey is indeed impressive. But why did Binance post a price of $0.00000001 that number is the most relevant to $BOB price before it was listed on Alpha Market. Why didn’t Binance just post the price as $0.1 instead, since $0.00000001 really characterizes $BOB ?
MILLIONAIRE What Do you think $BOB I have 20M $BOB COIN 🪙 Will Reach $0.5 or $1? 🤔 Yes ✅ or No ❌ 💬 Share your thoughts below. $BOB {alpha}(560x51363f073b1e4920fda7aa9e9d84ba97ede1560e) #ETH4500Next? #BinanceAlphaAlert #Notcoin
MILLIONAIRE What Do you think $BOB I have 20M $BOB COIN 🪙 Will Reach $0.5 or $1? 🤔 Yes ✅ or No ❌ 💬 Share your thoughts below. $BOB {alpha}(560x51363f073b1e4920fda7aa9e9d84ba97ede1560e) #ETH4500Next? #BinanceAlphaAlert #Notcoin
The character with the BNB logo on its head is $BOB . Always be selective when choosing any crypto project.
Don’t FOMO, including when buying BOB, always study first before deciding to buy $BOB . Belief is fine, but it must be supported by logical reasoning. Don’t let crypto projects with manipulative developers spread everywhere. They only want your money.
Always check and verify everything directly. Seek information from multiple sources, not just one. The most concrete and up-to-date source is BscScan.
I buy all BSC crypto tokens listed in Binance Alpha not without reason, but out of my curiosity. If I find something suspicious, I will immediately post about it.
I’m sure among all the people who read my posts, there are some who are programmers just like me, yet none of them comment on anything I say about blockchain, because for those who understand, what I say is the truth. That’s why I have never found a single comment on my post saying, “I’m a programmer, EXO, what you’ve said is wrong.”
I emphasize to you, never equate human logic with the way blockchain logic works. Never ignore any warning notes on on-chain data such as BscScan.
For example, with $BOB , a warning appeared on BscScan: “This token has been taken over by the community, and the original deployer has departed from the project. Please conduct due diligence when interacting with it.”
If you find a token project with such a warning, that means the token has truly renounced ownership and the developer has no control. If there is no such note, then the token can still be controlled through internal functions, even if there’s a claim of renounced ownership, but that’s not 100% true and it’s deceiving your eyes.
Only programmers who master the Solidity programming language can explain this, because even if you search multiple sources, if you don’t have knowledge of Solidity, it will be very difficult for you.
why are there token owners here? does that mean that the owner still controls the bob token?
the EXO girl
--
Bullish
The character with the BNB logo on its head is $BOB . Always be selective when choosing any crypto project.
Don’t FOMO, including when buying BOB, always study first before deciding to buy $BOB . Belief is fine, but it must be supported by logical reasoning. Don’t let crypto projects with manipulative developers spread everywhere. They only want your money.
Always check and verify everything directly. Seek information from multiple sources, not just one. The most concrete and up-to-date source is BscScan.
I buy all BSC crypto tokens listed in Binance Alpha not without reason, but out of my curiosity. If I find something suspicious, I will immediately post about it.
I’m sure among all the people who read my posts, there are some who are programmers just like me, yet none of them comment on anything I say about blockchain, because for those who understand, what I say is the truth. That’s why I have never found a single comment on my post saying, “I’m a programmer, EXO, what you’ve said is wrong.”
I emphasize to you, never equate human logic with the way blockchain logic works. Never ignore any warning notes on on-chain data such as BscScan.
For example, with $BOB , a warning appeared on BscScan: “This token has been taken over by the community, and the original deployer has departed from the project. Please conduct due diligence when interacting with it.”
If you find a token project with such a warning, that means the token has truly renounced ownership and the developer has no control. If there is no such note, then the token can still be controlled through internal functions, even if there’s a claim of renounced ownership, but that’s not 100% true and it’s deceiving your eyes.
Only programmers who master the Solidity programming language can explain this, because even if you search multiple sources, if you don’t have knowledge of Solidity, it will be very difficult for you.
Excuse me, I am not here to spread FUD, but I just want to ask the developer of Jager: Why is there an internal function like this in your token? You should know that I am a smart contract programmer, so you know my capacity. Please explain the purpose of creating such an internal function. You have already renounced ownership, but it turns out that control is still held through an internal function.
I am providing evidence of the vulnerability in the $Jager token smart contract, and the fact that the Jager token still retains developer control can be proven by the note on BscScan stating “OnlyOwner.” This means the ownership renounce was not fully carried out, because if there is a note saying “OnlyOwner,” it indicates the presence of an internal function even after renouncing ownership.
I am also including proof from the $BOB token as a comparison, showing that BOB has fully renounced ownership since BscScan does not display any notes, including “OnlyOwner.”
If there is no clarification within the next 24 hours, I will write further and describe the meaning of the internal function you have.