张老咪的饲养员Sxingz
2 Following
7 Followers
17 Liked
1 Shared
See original
Long time no see, Your Highness. I recently joined the Air Force team as well, and I like some less popular, low trading volume alternatives. The returns are pretty good 😅
What is口嗨
When you see a drop, you say where to short
When you see a drop, you say I told you so
When you see a drop, you say I’m bearish but I won't short
Where to short, you decide? Will you trade or not
You just say, then you should open a position, are you a little cutie who doesn’t eat the meat?
Being bearish but not shorting, only a few situations are reasonable
First, it has already dropped a wave, and setting a stop loss is not good.
Second, the market direction is unclear but leaning bearish.
Third, waiting for a rebound to enter a position on the drop.
Being bearish but not shorting, unreasonable situations
No money
口嗨
Hindsight
Rewritten
Little cutie
================
Honestly, if the short to medium-term plan is done well, there’s no need for those useless things
One trade, one vehicle is just a process
Next time, Princess will organize a few operating methods,
Divided into
Capital large, medium, small
Plans short, medium, long
Don't look at those unnutritious things anymore (angry）））
============
Look at the chart, how can you confidently keep adding short positions,
Where is the stop loss, leave a comment below if you know.
(Do we have to draw U again to give away? Haha)
When you see a drop, you say where to short
When you see a drop, you say I told you so
When you see a drop, you say I’m bearish but I won't short
Where to short, you decide? Will you trade or not
You just say, then you should open a position, are you a little cutie who doesn’t eat the meat?
Being bearish but not shorting, only a few situations are reasonable
First, it has already dropped a wave, and setting a stop loss is not good.
Second, the market direction is unclear but leaning bearish.
Third, waiting for a rebound to enter a position on the drop.
Being bearish but not shorting, unreasonable situations
No money
口嗨
Hindsight
Rewritten
Little cutie
================
Honestly, if the short to medium-term plan is done well, there’s no need for those useless things
One trade, one vehicle is just a process
Next time, Princess will organize a few operating methods,
Divided into
Capital large, medium, small
Plans short, medium, long
Don't look at those unnutritious things anymore (angry）））
============
Look at the chart, how can you confidently keep adding short positions,
Where is the stop loss, leave a comment below if you know.
(Do we have to draw U again to give away? Haha)
See original
$AUCTION is crazily selling at the 27 price level, while fools are still looking at 35, it's hilarious.
See original
$USDC 【White House's First Crypto Summit: The Game of Policy Momentum and Market Reality】
On March 7, the first crypto summit hosted by Trump came to a close. This meeting, touted as an "industry milestone," sparked controversy due to a lack of substantive policies. Trump boldly declared that the U.S. will adhere to the golden rule of "never selling Bitcoin" and will incorporate seized Bitcoins into its strategic reserves. However, the government's expected plans for increasing holdings and capital gains tax exemptions were not fulfilled, leading to a drop in Bitcoin's value on that day.
The summit gathered industry giants like Coinbase and MicroStrategy, as well as representatives from regulatory agencies, with topics covering regulatory frameworks, stablecoin legislation, and technological innovation. However, the core contradictions remain unresolved—the SEC's deadlock on token classification and the regulatory vacuum in DeFi are still pending. Although Trump attempted to consolidate political capital with "crypto hegemony," the industry needs clear rules rather than slogans. As experts warn: "When crypto becomes a political tool, its fate becomes deeply intertwined with the power game."
On March 7, the first crypto summit hosted by Trump came to a close. This meeting, touted as an "industry milestone," sparked controversy due to a lack of substantive policies. Trump boldly declared that the U.S. will adhere to the golden rule of "never selling Bitcoin" and will incorporate seized Bitcoins into its strategic reserves. However, the government's expected plans for increasing holdings and capital gains tax exemptions were not fulfilled, leading to a drop in Bitcoin's value on that day.
The summit gathered industry giants like Coinbase and MicroStrategy, as well as representatives from regulatory agencies, with topics covering regulatory frameworks, stablecoin legislation, and technological innovation. However, the core contradictions remain unresolved—the SEC's deadlock on token classification and the regulatory vacuum in DeFi are still pending. Although Trump attempted to consolidate political capital with "crypto hegemony," the industry needs clear rules rather than slogans. As experts warn: "When crypto becomes a political tool, its fate becomes deeply intertwined with the power game."
See original
#白宫首届加密货币峰会 【The First White House Crypto Summit: The Game Between Policy Momentum and Market Reality】
On March 7, the first White House crypto summit hosted by Trump concluded. This meeting, touted as an 'industry milestone,' sparked controversy due to a lack of substantial policies. Trump boldly declared that the U.S. would adhere to the golden rule of 'never selling Bitcoin' and would incorporate seized Bitcoins into its strategic reserves. However, the anticipated government accumulation plan and capital gains tax exemption did not materialize, leading to a drop in Bitcoin's value that day.
The summit brought together industry giants such as Coinbase and MicroStrategy, along with representatives from regulatory agencies, covering topics like regulatory frameworks, stablecoin legislation, and technological innovation. However, the core contradictions remain unresolved—issues like the SEC's deadlock on token classification and the regulatory vacuum in DeFi are still pending. Although Trump attempts to consolidate political capital through 'crypto hegemony,' the industry needs clear rules rather than slogans. As experts warn: 'When crypto becomes a political tool, its fate becomes deeply intertwined with the game of power.'
On March 7, the first White House crypto summit hosted by Trump concluded. This meeting, touted as an 'industry milestone,' sparked controversy due to a lack of substantial policies. Trump boldly declared that the U.S. would adhere to the golden rule of 'never selling Bitcoin' and would incorporate seized Bitcoins into its strategic reserves. However, the anticipated government accumulation plan and capital gains tax exemption did not materialize, leading to a drop in Bitcoin's value that day.
The summit brought together industry giants such as Coinbase and MicroStrategy, along with representatives from regulatory agencies, covering topics like regulatory frameworks, stablecoin legislation, and technological innovation. However, the core contradictions remain unresolved—issues like the SEC's deadlock on token classification and the regulatory vacuum in DeFi are still pending. Although Trump attempts to consolidate political capital through 'crypto hegemony,' the industry needs clear rules rather than slogans. As experts warn: 'When crypto becomes a political tool, its fate becomes deeply intertwined with the game of power.'
See original
$BTC **Bitcoin Policy Shift: U.S. Strategic Reserves and the New Global Financial Landscape**
On March 7, 2025, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order officially establishing a national Bitcoin strategic reserve, incorporating approximately 200,000 Bitcoins held by the U.S. government (primarily sourced from judicial seizures) into the reserve system, and pledged "not to sell these assets," aiming to strengthen the U.S. leadership position in the cryptocurrency field. This policy marks the first time the U.S. has included cryptocurrency in its national reserve framework and is one of the core initiatives of the Trump administration's "new cryptocurrency policy."
Trump's pivot to Bitcoin began with his campaign promises, which included firing the SEC chairman who took a hard stance on the crypto industry, banning central bank digital currency (CBDC), and promoting the establishment of a clear regulatory framework. Behind this shift is not only personal business interests but also national strategic considerations. In recent years, the share of the U.S. dollar in global reserve currencies has continued to decline, while crypto assets such as stablecoins are deeply tied to the dollar (95% of stablecoins are dollar-pegged), which has objectively reinforced the international status of the dollar through the cryptocurrency market's return to U.S. Treasury bonds. The Trump administration aims to position the U.S. as the "world capital of cryptocurrency" to counter technological competition from countries like China, while also shifting regulation from "strict control" to "supporting innovation" through legislation (such as the "21st Century Financial Innovation and Technology Act").
However, the market response following the implementation of the policy has been mixed. Although the long-term institutional benefits are recognized, Bitcoin's price dropped over 5% on the day the news was announced, with tokens like Ethereum and SOL also experiencing fluctuations, highlighting market concerns over the uncertainty of policy execution. Industry insiders, such as Solana co-founder Toly, pointed out that while the executive order eliminates some regulatory ambiguities, further clarification is needed on rules regarding token issuance, DeFi, and other areas.
Overall, the shift in U.S. Bitcoin policy serves as a litmus test for financial innovation and a new battleground for geopolitical economic competition. Its success or failure will profoundly impact the integration process of the global cryptocurrency ecosystem and the traditional financial system.
On March 7, 2025, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order officially establishing a national Bitcoin strategic reserve, incorporating approximately 200,000 Bitcoins held by the U.S. government (primarily sourced from judicial seizures) into the reserve system, and pledged "not to sell these assets," aiming to strengthen the U.S. leadership position in the cryptocurrency field. This policy marks the first time the U.S. has included cryptocurrency in its national reserve framework and is one of the core initiatives of the Trump administration's "new cryptocurrency policy."
Trump's pivot to Bitcoin began with his campaign promises, which included firing the SEC chairman who took a hard stance on the crypto industry, banning central bank digital currency (CBDC), and promoting the establishment of a clear regulatory framework. Behind this shift is not only personal business interests but also national strategic considerations. In recent years, the share of the U.S. dollar in global reserve currencies has continued to decline, while crypto assets such as stablecoins are deeply tied to the dollar (95% of stablecoins are dollar-pegged), which has objectively reinforced the international status of the dollar through the cryptocurrency market's return to U.S. Treasury bonds. The Trump administration aims to position the U.S. as the "world capital of cryptocurrency" to counter technological competition from countries like China, while also shifting regulation from "strict control" to "supporting innovation" through legislation (such as the "21st Century Financial Innovation and Technology Act").
However, the market response following the implementation of the policy has been mixed. Although the long-term institutional benefits are recognized, Bitcoin's price dropped over 5% on the day the news was announced, with tokens like Ethereum and SOL also experiencing fluctuations, highlighting market concerns over the uncertainty of policy execution. Industry insiders, such as Solana co-founder Toly, pointed out that while the executive order eliminates some regulatory ambiguities, further clarification is needed on rules regarding token issuance, DeFi, and other areas.
Overall, the shift in U.S. Bitcoin policy serves as a litmus test for financial innovation and a new battleground for geopolitical economic competition. Its success or failure will profoundly impact the integration process of the global cryptocurrency ecosystem and the traditional financial system.
See original
#比特币政策转变 **Bitcoin Policy Shift: U.S. Strategic Reserves and the New Global Financial Landscape**
On March 7, 2025, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order officially establishing a national Bitcoin strategic reserve, incorporating approximately 200,000 Bitcoins held by the U.S. government (primarily sourced from judicial seizures) into the reserve system, and pledging that "these assets will not be sold," aiming to strengthen the U.S. leadership position in the cryptocurrency sector. This policy marks the first time the U.S. has included cryptocurrencies in its national reserve framework and is one of the core initiatives of the Trump administration's "new policy on cryptocurrencies."
Trump's shift in Bitcoin policy began with his campaign promises, which included firing the SEC chairman who took a tough stance on the crypto industry, banning central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and promoting the establishment of a clear regulatory framework. Behind this shift is not only the drive for personal business interests but also strategic national considerations. In recent years, the share of the U.S. dollar as a global reserve currency has continued to decline, while crypto assets like stablecoins are deeply linked to the dollar (95% of stablecoins are dollar-pegged), which has objectively reinforced the dollar's international position through the cryptocurrency market's return to U.S. Treasuries. The Trump administration aims to establish the U.S. as the "world's cryptocurrency capital" to respond to technological competition from countries like China, while also promoting a shift from "strict control" to "supporting innovation" through legislation (such as the "21st Century Financial Innovation and Technology Act").
However, the market's reaction following the policy implementation has shown divergence. Despite the long-term institutional benefits being recognized, Bitcoin's price dropped over 5% on the day the news was announced, with tokens like Ethereum and SOL experiencing similar volatility, highlighting market concerns about the uncertainty of policy execution. Industry insiders, such as Solana co-founder Toly, pointed out that while the executive order eliminates some regulatory ambiguity, further clarification is needed regarding the rules for token issuance, DeFi, and other areas.
Overall, the shift in U.S. Bitcoin policy serves as both a litmus test for financial innovation and a new battleground for geopolitical economic competition. Its success or failure will profoundly impact the integration process between the global cryptocurrency ecosystem and the traditional financial system.
On March 7, 2025, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order officially establishing a national Bitcoin strategic reserve, incorporating approximately 200,000 Bitcoins held by the U.S. government (primarily sourced from judicial seizures) into the reserve system, and pledging that "these assets will not be sold," aiming to strengthen the U.S. leadership position in the cryptocurrency sector. This policy marks the first time the U.S. has included cryptocurrencies in its national reserve framework and is one of the core initiatives of the Trump administration's "new policy on cryptocurrencies."
Trump's shift in Bitcoin policy began with his campaign promises, which included firing the SEC chairman who took a tough stance on the crypto industry, banning central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and promoting the establishment of a clear regulatory framework. Behind this shift is not only the drive for personal business interests but also strategic national considerations. In recent years, the share of the U.S. dollar as a global reserve currency has continued to decline, while crypto assets like stablecoins are deeply linked to the dollar (95% of stablecoins are dollar-pegged), which has objectively reinforced the dollar's international position through the cryptocurrency market's return to U.S. Treasuries. The Trump administration aims to establish the U.S. as the "world's cryptocurrency capital" to respond to technological competition from countries like China, while also promoting a shift from "strict control" to "supporting innovation" through legislation (such as the "21st Century Financial Innovation and Technology Act").
However, the market's reaction following the policy implementation has shown divergence. Despite the long-term institutional benefits being recognized, Bitcoin's price dropped over 5% on the day the news was announced, with tokens like Ethereum and SOL experiencing similar volatility, highlighting market concerns about the uncertainty of policy execution. Industry insiders, such as Solana co-founder Toly, pointed out that while the executive order eliminates some regulatory ambiguity, further clarification is needed regarding the rules for token issuance, DeFi, and other areas.
Overall, the shift in U.S. Bitcoin policy serves as both a litmus test for financial innovation and a new battleground for geopolitical economic competition. Its success or failure will profoundly impact the integration process between the global cryptocurrency ecosystem and the traditional financial system.
See original
The currency $XRP dropped from 3.5, but it can rise again, whether through the summit or various news, it will definitely rise. The entire cryptocurrency market is now centralized, operating under the name of decentralization while doing centralized things; it's all the same, a zero-sum game. The major currencies need to rise for there to be profit, and players are the same, whether they want it to rise or fall, they're all just speculators. How many are truly doing value investment? How many in the cryptocurrency market really understand value investment? How many people understand the technology? It's just gambling in a different place, it's all the same; everyone is a speculator, all guessing the size. Isn't that what the newly launched event contracts are all about? Just missing a size specification.
See original
#美国加密战略储备 is bullish in the long term, but various policies are likely to be introduced to restrict the development of the cryptocurrency space. The United States also wants to get a piece of this pie, so it will inevitably impose restrictions on the development of the cryptocurrency sector, even aiming to control it like oil, to gain absolute discourse power. However, the cryptocurrency space is based on decentralization, and now it is being intervened to become highly centralized, which is somewhat contradictory. Nevertheless, this does not affect investors; I believe it has just transformed into another stock market. For ordinary investors, the cryptocurrency space is essentially a large zero-sum game, while for real investors, they can make money anywhere, just varying in how much. For gamblers, it’s all the same. I don’t understand the technical aspects well, so I’m not sure if it will cause a huge impact. In the long run, the impact is estimated to be small, as 80% of people in the cryptocurrency space do not focus on technology, including myself, but rather on whether they can make money or if there is popularity. This environment is just like that now, so the summit is merely a pretext for rising or falling; until substantial policies are introduced, I remain bullish.
See original
Long-term bullish, but decentralization is likely to become centralized.
See original
It's just that a drop of one or twenty points causes such a commotion; they haven't seen the world. When it gets cut in half again and again, won't they all jump off the building?
It's only a drop of a dozen points and you're already cursing. Isn't this just a waste of money in the cryptocurrency world?
It's normal to lose 30 points. History always repeats itself.
It's normal to lose 30 points. History always repeats itself.
See original
#加密圈新年预测2025谁将是黑马 sui is bound to become a dark horse, and is extremely promising. At least it will be in the top 4 before 2026!
See original
#分享蛇年理财新秘籍 in stock, position 50%, sell 90% when it reaches the ideal price, keep the rest for fun. Actually, I want to try holding BNB, getting some airdrops every year, and if BNB rises a bit more, the returns should be pretty good too!
See original
Don't close all the stocks, just keep 10
Looking back, it's really funny. If it's destined, it will come. If it's not destined, don't force it. Time is destiny. I bought OM for 138,000 yuan in January and February last year. The average price was RMB 1.99, nearly 70,000. Not to mention holding it until now, even if I hold it for a few months, it will be worth millions. But I exchanged it for a bunch of garbage, and kept holding it. It didn't increase in a year, but the principal was almost lost. Now there is a real bull market, which means that it will increase several times to make up for the investment.
See original
In the new year, may you prosper and prosper!
🎆🎆Wishing everyone a Happy New Year🎆🎆
If the market is boring, take a good rest
Wishing everyone can become a crypto god this year😘
If the market is boring, take a good rest
Wishing everyone can become a crypto god this year😘
Login to explore more contents