张启成说币

Human nature is to follow the crowd, which is beyond doubt. In the securities market, under the drive of huge profits, people's psychology tends to be consistent. Most people in speculative markets are destined to fail, so to succeed, one must break away from the crowd's mindset.

Therefore, we must examine ourselves from a higher perspective. In other words, we need to carefully observe whether we have common trading habits. If you find that a certain habit you have is shared by the majority, you must correct it. Specifically, the approach is to never act independently in the exchange but to engage with many stock friends. When you find that most people have the same habits as you, or many people hold the same stocks as you, you must correct it. Smart people always learn lessons from others. Breaking away from the crowd's thinking is a step closer to success.

——Extreme pressure from the U.S. cannot shake the resolve of the East; Chinese wisdom demonstrates great power responsibility in breaking the deadlock.

(1) American Bullying Upgraded: Tariff Numbers Become Political Games

As global attention focuses on the Middle East situation, Washington suddenly drops a bombshell— the Trump administration announces that the tariff rate on China will soar to 245%, setting a rare spectacle in the history of human trade. From 10% in February of this year to 104% in April, and now to 245%, U.S. policy has been as unpredictable as a roller coaster, with the tax rate skyrocketing 24 times in just two months, completely tearing apart the last semblance of international trade rules.

The White House's explanation is feeble and unconvincing; the so-called 'response to China's unfair trade' excuse has been debunked by data from the International Monetary Fund during the 104% tariff period: the average profit margin for Chinese exports to the U.S. is only 7.8%, far exceeding the World Trade Organization's standard for 'reasonable profits.' The real calculation of the U.S. side is to reshape the 'America-centered' trade system through extreme pressure, excluding China from the global supply chain.

If we were to condense the essence of U.S.-China rivalry, it would probably be a seemingly unavoidable 'century confrontation,' trapped in a situation where no one truly wants to press the button to start a war. In the turbulent standoff in the Pacific, the U.S. and China seem to be playing an endless game of chess. From the military intelligence reports of the Rand Corporation to the military plan controversy involving Musk, America's confident yet false predictions are truly amusing, and the deeper logic hidden behind this is far more exciting than mere rhetoric.

Americans like to hypothesize about war. Across several Pacifics, think tanks and media on the other side of the ocean almost wage war on paper every year. As early as 2016, the Rand Corporation released a 116-page report that could be considered a textbook on 'U.S.-China Confrontation Delusion.' They predicted in dramatic language that a war between the U.S. and China was not only unavoidable but would also be an unprecedented 'conventional war.' The battlefield envisioned by these 'experts' is in East Asia, primarily in the form of naval and aerial combat, with missile trajectories even planned as math problems. But curiously, they forecast that U.S. GDP would lose 5%-10% due to war, while China's economic decline could be more than three times that of the U.S. Is a war where they lose less and others lose more really what they are hoping for?

Bitcoin might plummet by 80%!

Financial Path Pioneer
2025-03-25 07:05 Chongqing
Follow
Recently, rumors about Bitcoin potentially plummeting have resurfaced. Some say that Bitcoin might drop 80% from its high, directly falling to around $20,000! This statement has made many investors tense, especially those who are 'all in'; they probably break into a cold sweat upon hearing it. This prediction is actually closely related to the movements of the U.S. stock market, especially the Nasdaq. Coupled with the subtle relationship between various tech tycoons and Bitcoin, the whole situation seems more complex.