1) The IP is almost impossible to monetize. So I don't see how anyone would pay much for it. Even $20mn feels like a hefty sum for something that will be unlikely to generate much return.
2) Talking about Yuga's acquisition of the IP at a higher price, without acknowledging that they also got around 420 punks (at a time when the floor was above $200k), is missing a lot of the transaction.
3) Yuga got lambasted by the crypto community almost anytime they did antyhing more than a book or a brunch with the punks IP, neither of which were profitable for them. Just reenforcing the idea that it's not IP that's easy to monetize.
4) They kept 414 of their punks. So the bulk of the value for them is in watching the punks price rise. They had to pick someone they thought would be good for prices overall.
5) Anyone who's raised money or done deals knows one rule very clearly: people saying they would buy something and people actually writing checks are extremely different matters. Who knows what real offers were out there, especially given the low value of the IP.
6) Given the criticism they received as a corporate owning something people wanted held by a non-profit or community, this buyer makes the most sense.
Today @refikanadol sold out his project "Biome Lumina" in 25 minutes. Each of the 1000 pieces cost $5k, generating $5mn. Each mint also comes with a physical 22"x44" print.
David Bailey announces a new BTC holding company which will merge with micro-cap KDLY to buy BTC, funded by debt and equity.
The KDLY stock is up 500% on the news.
Given how easy it is to buy BTC and how easy it appears to be to issue a holding company, I can't see a world where these continue to trade at a premium to NAV.
A discount to NAV feels much more likely, sooner than later, which basically defeats the purpose of them.
Everyone is trying to cash in on the Saylor premium. I just can't see that premium lasting given how easy it is to create more supply.