梅山好汉哥

Holding BNB is not as good as brushing alpha, being called a vampire, a retirement monster, not contributing, and the coin price is also unhelpful.
.
Some people think holding BNB is risk-free, while brushing alpha is risky. If that's the case, I suggest adding a requirement for holding a certain amount of BNB in the wallet team limitations, just to show good intentions.
.
Friends holding BNB, reach out to customer service with suggestions. Additionally, let's get involved, brush when necessary, and increase participation. When ordinary users can’t compete with the studios, they will collectively demand changes to the rules!
.
Regarding the retirement monster comment, CZ recently mentioned that holding BNB is the greatest contribution to Binance.
.
I should have no problem eating the low-income subsidy, right? Let's get involved.

#币安Alpha积分 Unfortunately, just one account point is enough, airdrop 1500 $SIGN , tomorrow's new investments and airdrops may score higher than today, anyway, I have to keep grinding, if tomorrow doesn't work, the day after may be enough, everyone is competing, no choice, I have to participate too, I don't even know what the meaning of doing this is, it doesn't empower $BNB at all, everyone is grinding on sol, user retention is almost non-existent.
.
The HODLer gave me $SIGN , I haven't sold it yet, it's too little, doesn't feel like much, I listed it at 0.1U, too many new coins, don't know which pattern to follow.
.
Anyway, since we're playing here, let's grind some alpha.

Before #币安Alpha积分 worked on daily sign-ins for projects for two or three years, and ended up with nothing, while also spending a lot on GAS fees.

Now with Binance's alpha, just trading casually brings in money. For ordinary people, there's nothing simpler than this. Those who watch ads and click on WEB2 software only make a few dozen bucks a month.

In spot trading, I keep a minimum of 100U-200U, and trade above 256U daily, focusing on large market cap projects like $SOL , with market caps of 1 billion and almost no loss. Just trading a bit each day meets the qualifications for the vast majority of projects.

I just don’t know how long this kind of play can last. Right now, it’s definitely the best place to make money.

#币安HODLer空投SIGN SIGN listed on Binance. I heard about this project in the small universe before but didn't pay much attention. Later, when Binance Labs invested, I realized that NFTs had skyrocketed in value, and I missed out. They were over 5000 USDT each, which I can't afford.
.
I want to get some SIGN, but I don't know how to participate. Their community is a bit weird; being there, they are very motivated, talking about everything, probably all young people or university students? It's different from the crypto groups I've been in; I just can't get involved, and I don't know how to participate. Later, the market turned bad, ETH halved, and NFT prices dropped to over 1.6 ETH. I got one, made a small profit, and then left.
.
The cost of buying NFTs at high prices might be a bit steep. Recently purchased ones shouldn't lose value; an NFT airdrop is worth 47,500 coins. NFTs still have some residual value, which is actually quite a bit. However, the current market value of the projects is not doing well. Early participants might not have much good outcome, and there are criticisms, but overall it's still okay.
.
HODLers have airdrops, and alpha also has airdrops. I won't sell for now; I'll see the market value later. I might buy some more. I don't know if NFTs are still useful; I placed a buy order, and it went through. I'll see when the app launches if they can be used.
.
Although I didn't do anything in their community, I listened to quite a few podcasts from the founders, and they can really communicate well.

#币安上线INIT Binance's current promotional operation must be a novice, right? Today, this event of splitting 1 million $INIT was easily taken away, and throwing money still gets criticized. Congratulations to those who got it, working hard for a few days, casually trading, and having several million in capital for mining.
.
How much does this contribute to trading volume? Is that how the coins you leave behind are given out?

#币安Alpha上新 ZORA has finally been sold. From the first sale to a successful sale, it was short by 50U, but considering the current market, it's still a good profit.
.
This ZORA token, I originally minted a lot during the paid mint phase, and it has $ETH on its own chain, but when I checked today, I only received 17! This is the current trend of profit-taking, luckily alpha sent 4276, this bizarre project has already launched its token, and the official hasn't released any news at all. No need to think, it's a trash project.

#币安Alpha上新 There are rumors in the community that as long as you have 3 of $BNB , you will never have to worry about food and clothing in this life.
.
You don't even need to hold BNB; just swiping alpha will bring airdrops, and when wallets are launching new tokens, BNB can be borrowed as well. Now that wallet users have increased, project teams also prefer to list on Binance; other exchanges should be struggling right now. After years of working with project teams, sometimes it's not even as good as an alpha airdrop or a new token launch.
.
Additionally, those who are struggling are the BNB holders. One address doing a new token launch gives more than holding several million worth of BNB, which is quite unreasonable! In the future, airdrops or new token launches should somewhat require BNB holdings, right? At least give some empowerment, like 0.05 or 0.1, just to show some appreciation.

#币安LaunchpoolINIT is so miserable, now the circulating market value of the new coin is only tens of millions, the good thing is that the people who take over can lose less money, and if lucky, they might even make a little profit.
.
There is no profit-making effect anymore, stablecoins are not increasing, there is almost no volatility, and FDUSD hasn't returned to 1U. I had previously exchanged all my stablecoins for USDC, and now I don't even want to hold USDC, the yields are too low!
.
Now that the market value of the new coin itself is low, Binance has kept half of the coins for marketing, I don't know how the remaining coins will be used. If they're for mining, that's fine, but the ones kept before haven't even started to be used, there's no precedent.
.
Are you still mining?

This matter, $OM , should prompt the entire industry to stand up. Those capable should disclose the evidence they have found, rather than saying: other exchanges were the first to crash the market.
.
Certain security announcements say that other exchanges were the first to crash the market; certain easy announcements say that other exchanges were the first to crash the market.
.
Previously, when projects were hacked, it was never this severe.

#Megadrop Some say that in the megadrop, there were 700,000 more people for no reason in two hours. I checked the data from the previous three phases.
.
The main factor affecting how everyone shares the tokens is the number of people completing tasks. In the first phase, $BB , 430,000 completed it; in the second phase, $LISTA , 890,000 completed it; in the third phase, $SOLV , 640,000 completed it. Today’s KERNEL had 940,000 completions.
.
Today there are 50,000 more than the second phase and 300,000 more than the third phase. Given that there are fewer places to make money now, plus many studios added accounts for wallet launches, it’s normal for the number of completions to be a bit higher. Saying there are 700,000 more seems a bit exaggerated. It’s likely that the data was combined and displayed during the statistics.
.
Now Binance has traffic, and everyone is willing to watch.

The results of the second phase of voting for listing have come out, and as always, there are complaints about not listing according to the voting results. They don't read announcements, don't look at contract trading volumes, don't look at alpha trading volumes, and only focus on the rankings from vote manipulation.
.
Everyone knows that the top rankings are bought votes, yet they still want Binance to place them higher. What they are worried about is that next time, there won't be any project parties buying votes!!
.
In my opinion, they should directly change the current method. Binance can select the voting pool themselves. Since the project parties like bribing for votes, they could simply guarantee that the one who gets the most votes will get listed. Let them donate coins to compete directly, and the first one will be listed, with coins distributed to all participants in the voting. Those who don’t make it can try again next time. It should be fair, just, and open, but voting power should be based on BNB holdings. Why should people who don’t care about Binance have voting rights? They are only concerned about how much their votes can be sold for.
.
Or, I’d say, just cancel the voting. If they smash the table themselves, then no one will complain.

Making money is really difficult now, has deflation spread to the crypto world? The new wallet has a super subscription of more than 100 times, earning just over 10 USDT! This still requires an investment of several thousand USDT as principal. Earning 10 USDT now is already good! I hope it doesn't break the issue price in the future!
.
Today, $BABY launched a new project, and some people calculated that the BNB mining yield is 0.07%, which annualizes to 1.7%. When has it ever been this bad? I don't remember it ever being this terrible. Mining returns have directly plummeted to just one-tenth or one-twentieth!!
.
The valuation of new projects is basically one-tenth of what it used to be. Projects that launched before fell for two years, and that's about the current valuation. Now they fall in just two days, anyway, the projects are that bad; the valuation might even be higher now!!
.
It feels harder to make money than in 2019 or 2020; mainly, it’s because the easy gains are no longer available, there are no chain games, no DeFi mining, even stablecoin investments have dropped below 1%, and there are no meme coins to play with, it's really hard to imagine.
.
No pain, no gain, I hope the crypto world has a better future and that those VC firms that exploit retail investors get scared.
.
Where are you all making money?!
#币安HODLer空投BABY

Didn't you say Sun Ge is a fraud? So should we believe what he says or not? He also said that his stablecoin won't go under.
.
If FDUSD continues to mine new coins in the next phase, how will you respond? Don't feel heartbroken if you lost money upon hearing the news; after all, preserving your principal is very important. If you operated on your own, it's better to find someone to blame. Should we blame Sun Ge? Blame Binance? Blame ourselves?
.
Although $FDUSD mined a lot, he is too unstable and often underwater. I have complained about this before; once USDC can be mined, I will use USDC.

BNB crazy new listing, is it a bit different now? Walk the path of others, leaving them with no path to walk, DEX and other exchanges should be trembling.

Listing on the main site, new token listings in wallets, alpha listings, wasn't it said before that VC project valuations are high? Now directly bringing down the valuations, there’s no cost-performance ratio for listing on other exchanges, all valuations will first be brought down to ten or twenty million, with some worthless ones at a few million, and then we’ll pan for gold.

#币安Alpha上新 Binance wallet's IDO almost missed, slept with the child, only woke up in the afternoon to find out about the new offering. The $BNB I have is all in fixed deposits, and I still need to borrow, many places are already out of lending options. I usually don't borrow on-chain; my wallet has been hacked before, which left me with trauma. Fortunately, I successfully subscribed in the end.
.
Now that more people are participating, the price is not as good as $SHELL , and the returns have been halved and halved again. However, in this market, it's still good to make some money.
.
Previously, I saw Vitalik buying an NFT of a prediction platform called Truemarkets on Base, which had an airdrop. I also bought some, and as a result, today during the TGE, the airdrop coins made me lose half. In my memory, I've never made a profit when buying NFTs for airdrops; last year, there was a project that made me lose 99%, it’s hard to guard against.

#币安优化上币机制 These new coins, I see that they all have the same market maker as $GPS and $SHELL , all of them are dumping! How about voting to delist and first voting for these new coins!!

The project itself is a PPT, it is plagiarized, it is fake. VC needs to make money, the project side needs to make money, market makers need to make money, consultants need to make money, media need to make money, KOLs need to make money, those taking advantage need to make money, exchanges need to make money, scientists need to make money. Why do you think you can still make money by buying in the secondary market?
.
The ones dumping the price for 13820598148 and $SHELL are the same market maker, no need to think, this is just the tip of the iceberg, these are the two that have been discovered. So what has the industry become now? Where do ordinary users find their opportunities? What does the project's quality have to do with the tokens? Not to mention that the current projects are not making money at all, and even profitable projects have little to do with the holders. Even meme projects are getting involved to stir things up, and now everyone is just watching.
.
Why hasn't Binance and the related project parties disclosed which market maker it is?

Interpretation of Binance's new coin listing mechanism and community feedback.
Looking at it, there are actually two points: 1. Voting for coin listings and voting for delistings; 2. Exclusive TGE direct access to alpha for Binance wallet.
·
1. Voting for coin listings allows users holding a small amount of BNB to vote, selecting coins from the market and alpha to enter the pool. The selection of which coins enter the pool is made by Binance. Unlike before, if the votes are truly first or second, there is a high probability they will be listed directly on Binance. Previously, voting didn't guarantee a listing.

Voting for delistings refers to voting on coins in the observation area, expressing a desire to delist; it doesn't mean they will be delisted immediately. Binance will likely consider other factors. There is an interesting play where a button is added on the trading page, allowing users to click to delist, enabling long-term voting and listening to community voices!
.
2. It seems that the exclusive TGE for Binance wallet will increase in the future. The last event, 74162416009, was very successful and can truly be considered a win-win, which also addressed the current issue of high market cap tokens, and it can definitely be done more often!!
.
Currently, the external view on this voting isn't very optimistic, saying that Huobi did something similar before, and there could be vote-buying, with people buying ahead of time to rank higher. I feel that these concerns aren't valid.
.
Regarding vote-buying, Binance needs to address this and can address it by taking snapshots before voting, requiring holding time, trading volume, trading frequency, facial recognition during voting, and other technical means, etc. However, if Binance wants data and to attract new users, it will be defaulted, and then it can only be a direct competition among project parties. What Binance truly needs to do is thorough due diligence!!!
.
As for the issue of buying tokens ahead of time, this is even less of a problem. Now, with sudden announcements, bots can drive up market cap, providing retail investors even less opportunity. For voting, waiting until the rankings are high to buy will definitely reduce profits. When the voting list is first released, retail investors with vision can make more money by selecting wisely.
.
Direct listings, pools, holders, megadrops, etc. are still ongoing, and the problem of high market caps still exists. The new voting system is only relatively fair; it is still recommended to focus more on wallet listings!! Give more opportunities to startup projects and users.
.
How can we give startup projects a chance to be listed on Binance? What can we users do when project parties act maliciously?

Binance should take on more responsibility to combat industry fraud. The actions of market makers like $GPS are clearly exploiting investors, as they have been continuously dumping since the opening, having sold off 70 million tokens without placing a single buy order in between. Market makers hold a large amount of chips and can drive prices down as much as they want, eventually buying back at a low price, guaranteeing profit without loss.
.
It is understandable for market makers to make money, but they also need to provide liquidity. If they only sell and do not buy, the market will end up in this terrible state. This is just one instance; are other projects doing the same?
.
This harms exchanges, users, and project parties, and even tarnishes the entire industry. Now you understand why the K-line of your new coins at Binance looks so bad.

The market for the currency #RED is a bit chaotic right now, and the total supply showing 181 million is definitely incorrect; we’ll have to wait for an update. There are many factors involved, so I really dare not buy.
.
It is written that the circulating supply will increase to 280 million at the official launch, but it’s uncertain when the official launch will be, so there’s a sword hanging over our heads; who dares to buy now?
.
For $RED , it shows that 240 million will be unlocked on March 6. Could it be that March 6 is the official launch? Isn’t that a bit too early? If trading could happen for more than half a month before the launch, I might actually dare to buy; the previous two pre-launch currencies both increased nicely afterward. If $RED officially launches soon, then I’m afraid of a price crash.
.
Next time before the launch, the rules will definitely have to be revised again. The price limit strategy doesn’t seem to work well; I tried for three days and couldn’t manage to get any. Now I can buy it at will!