EliBenSasson
0 Following
3 Followers
4 Liked
0 Shared
Posts
Diplomacy communication channels:
Yesterday - cables
Today - Twitter
Tomorrow - Blockchain
Yesterday - cables
Today - Twitter
Tomorrow - Blockchain
Should we still care about decentralization?
IMO, the answer is a clear yes.
Making it happen is often complex and difficult, and it can occasionally cost you popularity points. But it's essential for safety, censorship resistance, and independence.
So yes, we should care A LOT about decentralization. We shouldn't toss it aside just because it's hard.
What does decentralization look like?
On Starknet, it means:
🕸️Advancing along the staking path (now at Phase 2) to make validation accessible to all
🕸️An open-sourced stack (hello Cairo! hello Stow!!)
🕸️Nurturing a decentralized ecosystem that builds a variety of tools for devs and users
🕸️More stuff! (feel free to add to the list)
That's my 2 cents. The END
IMO, the answer is a clear yes.
Making it happen is often complex and difficult, and it can occasionally cost you popularity points. But it's essential for safety, censorship resistance, and independence.
So yes, we should care A LOT about decentralization. We shouldn't toss it aside just because it's hard.
What does decentralization look like?
On Starknet, it means:
🕸️Advancing along the staking path (now at Phase 2) to make validation accessible to all
🕸️An open-sourced stack (hello Cairo! hello Stow!!)
🕸️Nurturing a decentralized ecosystem that builds a variety of tools for devs and users
🕸️More stuff! (feel free to add to the list)
That's my 2 cents. The END
Many successful crypto end-user products were built on infra that doesn't scale. So when at some point herds of users came in, followed by many app devs, infra got congested & users/builders left dissapointed.
Enter Starknet.
Enter Starknet.
Two Crypto people can keep a secret between them, provided one is dead.
Bitcoin soft fork that no one should object to:
1. Allows efficient post-quantum zkSTARK verification
2. Allows L2s to exist
3. Bans anything but the zkSTARK proof
No "Mevil", no jpegs, no "spam" on L1. You get scale, privacy, some pq-security.
Thoughts?
1. Allows efficient post-quantum zkSTARK verification
2. Allows L2s to exist
3. Bans anything but the zkSTARK proof
No "Mevil", no jpegs, no "spam" on L1. You get scale, privacy, some pq-security.
Thoughts?
Privacy Perps DEX thread. Tldr:
*The only* viable solution uses ZK, encryption + central operator.
Scales to 200M users, easily
Subtext: I’m *the* expert on this shit (see Fine Print).
ALPHA: at THE END
>>
*The only* viable solution uses ZK, encryption + central operator.
Scales to 200M users, easily
Subtext: I’m *the* expert on this shit (see Fine Print).
ALPHA: at THE END
>>
Everyone who's a someone wants a Perps with Privacy. And ZK makes sense here. What's the bottleneck? Can it be done? What about performance and UX?
Thread coming tomorrow. Follow to not miss out.
Thread coming tomorrow. Follow to not miss out.
Tommorow I'ma explain privacy perps numbers on ZK.
Starknet Investment Thesis: Focus Tree and mass adoption.
Focus Tree is a consumer app with ~500,000 active users, and rising. Real users, new users, young users, non-crypto users.
They'll all go onchain, on Starknet.
Not investment advice, DYOR
>>
Focus Tree is a consumer app with ~500,000 active users, and rising. Real users, new users, young users, non-crypto users.
They'll all go onchain, on Starknet.
Not investment advice, DYOR
>>
Starknet gonna eat the world and leave no crumbs.
Login to explore more contents