Recap of what @DarkSide2030_ @tomyoungjr and I have been saying on BitBonds.
1. It is critical to understand that the issuer of these BitBonds will generally have ZERO exposure to Bitcoin.
2. In all cases, an intermediary such as Cantor will swap the BitBond cash flows for fixed rate or floating rate debt, so the issue just gets CHEAPER debt.
3. These bonds will be insta-hits with retail investors who do want exposure to Bitcoin. Why? Because they can be structured to offer high coupons and/or high yields under relatively modest BTC CAGR assumptions.
4. We know this because of SRTF, SRTK issued by MSTR. A BitBond issued by a Sovreign, or a Muni with triple tax free status yielding 10% effectively would be a nuclear bomb.
5. The US Created the first Nuke in 1945 at Los Alamos. But the Russians got the bomb just four years later in 1949. Now 9 countries have it. Saylor created the first Bitcoin Nuke in 2024. Now, in 2025 lots of others will become nuclear treasuries.
6. Ultimately the issuers of BBAAS (BitBonds as a Service) will keep the residual Bitcoin. This is how they end up with "more Bitcoin than Saylor".
Recap of what @DarkSide2030_ @tomyoungjr and I have been saying on BitBonds.
1. It is critical to understand that the issuer of these BitBonds will generally have ZERO exposure to Bitcoin.
2. In all cases, an intermediary such as Cantor will swap the BitBond cash flows for fixed rate or floating rate debt, so the issue just gets CHEAPER debt.
3. These bonds will be insta-hits with retail investors who do want exposure to Bitcoin. Why? Because they can be structured to offer high coupons and/or high yields under relatively modest BTC CAGR assumptions.
4. We know this because of SRTF, SRTK issued by MSTR. A BitBond issued by a Sovreign, or a Muni with triple tax free status yielding 10% effectively would be a nuclear bomb.
5. The US Created the first Nuke in 1945 at Los Alamos. But the Russians got the bomb just four years later in 1949. Now 9 countries have it. Saylor created the first Bitcoin Nuke in 2024. Now, in 2025 lots of others will become nuclear treasuries.
In January 2023, a "Bitcoin Treasury Company" called GBTC was trading at a 45% discount.
The only question on anybody's mind was how to get that discount to disappear. The answer to everybody, including GBTC who extracted a 2% fee on its 650,000 BTC was to convert to an ETF.
Now, just 2.5 years later, the exact same concept is being revived as "genius", and it is automatically assumed that these things should trade at a 200% premium.
Without passing judgement on whether these things are good investments or not -- it's just amazing that we could have gone between these two extremes this quickly.
"What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party."