Tyao沉思录

In chart patterns, channels usually imply stability, such as triangular reversal channels and wedge reversal channels. Channel boundaries can generally serve as entry points for shorting & going long. However, a well-formed channel typically requires three points to determine a boundary. In the $PENGU so-called 'upward channel' chart, we can see that it has already failed, and at the second point. If we here use the lower boundary of the channel as a basis for going long, it actually carries the suspicion of predicting the market trend, as we firmly believe it will eventually form a channel. This is not advisable.

In the traditional Web2 world, the fate of tech giants is decided by their boards and executives, while users are merely consumers of products. One of the core ideas of blockchain and Web3 is to disrupt this model and return power to the participants of the ecosystem. Pyth Network deeply practices this concept. It is not only a protocol that provides data but also a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) jointly governed and owned by $PYTH token holders. This means that the future development direction of Pyth is no longer dictated by a core team but is shaped collectively by the community through collective wisdom.

Whether a project can take off largely depends on whether its token economic model can truly capture ecological value. The design of $MITO aims to make it an indispensable 'blood' of the Mitosis network.@Mitosis Official #Mitosis
Core utility of $MITO :
Governance: By holding $MITO , you are a 'shareholder' of the Mitosis protocol. You can vote on proposals regarding key parameter adjustments, supported new chains, fee distribution, etc. This is the most basic function.
Gas Fee: All cross-chain operations, such as generating mLRT, cross-chain messaging, etc., require $MITO to pay fees. This means the more active the ecosystem, the greater the demand for $MITO ! This is a huge value accumulation mechanism.

Making money is the hard truth! The reason Mitosis is so exciting is that it has designed a revenue model that can be called a 'money printer'—Triple-Yielding.
In traditional DeFi mining, are you grateful if you earn an APY of 10%? Mitosis lets you experience what it means to be a 'winner takes all':
First layer of income: Base Yield
This part is the money that your original assets should earn. For example, if you deposit in Uniswap V3 LP, you still earn trading fees. This part of the income is guaranteed and is your basic income.
Second layer of income: Staking Rewards

Recently, the cryptocurrency market has been changing rapidly, and amidst this commotion, Solana (SOL) has quietly become the 'darling' of many institutional investors' asset allocation tables. A significant wave of institutional buying is occurring, which is not just a retail frenzy but also a deep layout by savvy capital behind the scenes. So, which institutions are 'buying, buying, buying'? What is the logic behind it? This article will provide you with an in-depth analysis.
1. Recent movements of major institutions at a glance
In the past few days, market public information has shown that multiple listed companies and investment institutions have disclosed their strategic measures to increase their holdings of SOL, with frequent actions that are eye-catching:

Amid the wave of blockchain technology sweeping the globe, Web3 games and the metaverse were once filled with high hopes, seen as the next disruptive digital frontier. We dreamed of an open, interconnected virtual world where our identities are unique, assets are free, and we can seamlessly traverse different digital experiences. However, after many years of development, reality has fallen far short of the ideal, and we seem to be trapped in dazzling 'digital islands.'

1. Glorious vision and stark reality
The initial idea was beautiful: a blockchain-based game where players can truly own in-game assets (NFTs) that can be freely traded on the open market and even used across games. The metaverse is imagined as a new digital frontier co-created and shared by users.

In the digital age, trust cannot rely on hollow promises, but must be built on verifiable cryptographic proofs. The reason Pyth Network can become an institutional-level data source is not only because it is fast, but also because it is verifiable, auditable, and tamper-proof. It transforms the term 'trust' from subjective belief to objective verification through a sophisticated set of cryptographic and economic mechanisms, thereby ensuring the integrity and transparency of the data.
The paradigm shift from 'trusting third parties' to 'verifying the data itself'
Traditional financial data models rely on 'trust': you trust Bloomberg terminals, you trust Reuters data, because you have to believe that their data processing is an opaque black box. Even in some blockchain oracles, you also need to 'trust' that node operators will not act maliciously.