Decentralized Anti-Cheat: Reputation Points Accompanying the Entire Chain
XAI collaborates with multiple data feeding nodes to put ban information from VAC, Easy-Anti-Cheat, etc., on the chain to generate immutable "negative certificates." New games can automatically read the reputation points when users log in, determining the battleground or drop rate, truly achieving "one violation, everywhere restricted." At the same time, players can gradually redeem themselves through long-term compliant gameplay, with the system's open algorithm ensuring a balance between punishment and correction.
It really is a stroke of luck from the heavens, Binance is truly addressing issues seriously and treating every retail investor fairly!!! From now on, I will definitely work hard to build the BNB chain! I have also shared this luck with many group friends and peers! Like and share, 10 lucky viewers will be drawn from the comments section, each receiving an airdrop of 1000 uuu tokens!
Do you really take deepseek seriously? It's a 2.0 upgraded version of Baidu, and all the data relies on data integration. What is there to develop?
天才交易员谢昊
--
The second episode of college students deepseek trading cryptocurrencies. After two days, I feel it's quite silly; my 10u investment has dropped to 7.3u. The effect of using the deepseek API cloud interface is not very good; it should be considered that I haven't fed it data. I plan to deploy the v3 model locally and feed it with nearly 10 years of BTC data. I feel it should perform much better than the cloud API. I expect to start tomorrow, haha. Those interested can follow me for the sequel; everyone is welcome to communicate together.
@XAI_GAMES Staking Economy Empowers the Future of GameFi Xai's staking mechanism breaks the traditional model of blockchain games that solely relies on 'hype' and 'pay-to-win', tying the interests of players and project parties together. Players can earn long-term profits by staking nodes, while also enjoying airdrops and token dividends that game developers may offer. At the same time, the staking pool system can stimulate more community collaboration, promoting Xai to establish a solid value support in the market. For users looking to achieve success in the GameFi field, Xai is the key to the next revolution in game ecosystems. $XAI
I'm long, and I'm bullish on Bitcoin. At worst, I can deliver food on JD.com, and I've got the five social insurances and one housing fund. I've already found out.
$DOT has currently broken through a daily level resistance trend line and is now making another upward breakthrough after a pullback, with volume present at the bottom. You can enter in batches at the current price of 4.7. The short-term target is at 5.4 here. $DOT #
Back TM, this little increase isn't even enough for my airdrop task's U, CTM.
币圈浪漫哥_
--
The strong return of V God, the co-founder of METIS, is here. Something big is coming, the big players are up to something, and trading volume has obviously increased...$METIS The project's market cap ranking is surprisingly only 140 million, a correction has taken place, and it has been oscillating at the bottom for a year. Previously, it peaked at 320 dollars. The project has already gone through a round of bull and bear markets, and it was only listed on Binance last year, leaving huge room for growth... Currently in L2, it has the greatest potential, and there is no unlocking sell pressure. The project's operational team is also strong, and the project has positive returns. It is a long-term project, and the big players are also strong. The current price is relatively reasonable, and being positioned at a low level, this price will definitely not result in losses. There is a chance for a tenfold increase 🤔 🆚 Compared with public chains: ARB 2 billion, OP 1.4 billion 🆚 Compared with the AI sector: TAO 3.2 billion, ai16z 500 million Metis has also been making moves in AI recently, with continuous technical, operational, and market actions. It's capable of making big moves, could it really only have this market cap? I have already positioned a little, and will watch the trend in a few days. If it breaks resistance, it’s appropriate to increase my holdings significantly! 1⃣ The basic thought is that some altcoins have entered the oversold stage, and there is market panic, which I think is understandable. 2⃣ However, the project has not stagnated but is actively testing and exploring market hot spots. 3⃣ Plus, with the team's previous successful experience, we can appropriately build positions to capture its AI expected story $METIS $METIS
#空投 The rewards for the previous Métis staking activity have been issued, worth 2 oil. I pledged 35 on the first day to buy it, and now the price has dropped to 23. With the rewards, I have definitely earned 10 oil back.
PS: The latest news is that the project has issued another 0.7 oil.
Pi has succeeded, are you upset? If you're not satisfied, why don't you create one too? 🤪🤪🤪🤪
Pi币受害者
--
#pi #pinetwork's founders are untrustworthy. After co-founder @_vincentpaul_ expressed concerns about the company and its working conditions, they fired him—other founders are a married couple with violent and threatening interactions between them. All of this is documented in the filed lawsuit.
On July 22, 2020, Vincent McPhillip filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California, against defendants including Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis, Dr. Chengdiao Fan, Pi Community Company, and SocialChain, Inc.
McPhillip accused Kokkalis and Fan of marital issues that resulted in inappropriate behavior in the workplace, including shouting and physical violence he witnessed between them. This created a hostile work environment that affected his ability to fulfill his CEO duties.
McPhillip claimed that in April 2020, he temporarily left the work environment to consider company issues, but Kokkalis and Fan claimed he “abandoned his position” and “resigned voluntarily.” They then terminated his access to the Pi/SocialChain servers and bank accounts without his consent.
Kokkalis and Fan were accused of threatening to exclusively issue additional shares to the founders at a low price ($0.00005 per share) to dilute McPhillip's shares in Pi. McPhillip claimed this was a malicious tactic aimed at reducing the value of his shares, knowing that due to the current conflict, he could not participate.