Binance Square

区块链测评

站在投资者立场深扒区块链项目,消除信息差,项目更透明。
22 Following
132 Followers
204 Liked
47 Shared
All Content
--
See original
In the past six months, ETH whales have actually been quietly offloading Two days ago, I wrote an article titled "[近半年ETH活跃地址数与价格的关系](https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/square/post/22689424679249)", revealing that the number of active addresses per week has fallen below 2.2 million, indirectly reflecting the reasons for ETH's lackluster price. Today, let's analyze the relationship between the number of new addresses (new users) for the past six months, $ETH , and the price, and we find that a divergence has occurred between these two data indicators recently, which is a bit strange. I will provide possible reasons behind the data at the end of the article. Looking at two time periods, during the "Trump Trade"—from the end of October last year to early December, the number of new ETH address users remained between 75,000-88,000, showing a positive correlation with the ETH price. This is understandable; new retail investors keep coming in to take over, which helps maintain the price. However, since the beginning of December 2024, after the "Trump Trade" ended, the number of new users dropped to 71,000 on January 9, and then began to rise again, especially from the end of March to April, where the number of new users increased to around 85,000, reflecting that new users are buying in at low prices. However, on-chain data shows that the number of active addresses is on a downward trend, which can only indicate that the whales are offloading, while most investors remain inactive. Don't think that whales and the market judgment abilities are stronger than those of retail investors; recently, the Trump family's WLF's ETH has also suffered losses. ................................... If this post is useful to you, please like, comment, and share to encourage support, thank you. {future}(ETHUSDT)
In the past six months, ETH whales have actually been quietly offloading

Two days ago, I wrote an article titled "近半年ETH活跃地址数与价格的关系", revealing that the number of active addresses per week has fallen below 2.2 million, indirectly reflecting the reasons for ETH's lackluster price.

Today, let's analyze the relationship between the number of new addresses (new users) for the past six months, $ETH , and the price, and we find that a divergence has occurred between these two data indicators recently, which is a bit strange. I will provide possible reasons behind the data at the end of the article.

Looking at two time periods, during the "Trump Trade"—from the end of October last year to early December, the number of new ETH address users remained between 75,000-88,000, showing a positive correlation with the ETH price. This is understandable; new retail investors keep coming in to take over, which helps maintain the price.

However, since the beginning of December 2024, after the "Trump Trade" ended, the number of new users dropped to 71,000 on January 9, and then began to rise again, especially from the end of March to April, where the number of new users increased to around 85,000, reflecting that new users are buying in at low prices. However, on-chain data shows that the number of active addresses is on a downward trend, which can only indicate that the whales are offloading, while most investors remain inactive.

Don't think that whales and the market judgment abilities are stronger than those of retail investors; recently, the Trump family's WLF's ETH has also suffered losses.
...................................
If this post is useful to you, please like, comment, and share to encourage support, thank you.
See original
The relationship between the number of active ETH addresses and prices in the past six monthsI am observing the weekly number of ETH active addresses, which is the total number of wallet addresses that have engaged in transactions (sent or received) within a week. Data source: glassnode What is the use of observing active addresses? The more active addresses there are, the more popular the chain is, indicating a vibrant market; conversely, the opposite is true. It can serve as one of the indicators of 'on-chain popularity' to reference ETH's market sentiment and future price trends. Analysis and Commentary It is obvious that there is a clear positive correlation between the number of active addresses and ETH prices. The price trend and the number of active addresses generally align.

The relationship between the number of active ETH addresses and prices in the past six months

I am observing the weekly number of ETH active addresses, which is the total number of wallet addresses that have engaged in transactions (sent or received) within a week.

Data source: glassnode
What is the use of observing active addresses?
The more active addresses there are, the more popular the chain is, indicating a vibrant market; conversely, the opposite is true. It can serve as one of the indicators of 'on-chain popularity' to reference ETH's market sentiment and future price trends.
Analysis and Commentary
It is obvious that there is a clear positive correlation between the number of active addresses and ETH prices. The price trend and the number of active addresses generally align.
See original
$USUAL staked 2800 usual on the USUAL official website, currently receiving a stable USD 0 weekly, but the earnings are on a downward trend. Recently, what is this former French congressman doing?
$USUAL staked 2800 usual on the USUAL official website, currently receiving a stable USD 0 weekly, but the earnings are on a downward trend. Recently, what is this former French congressman doing?
See original
$USUAL returns to 1 US dollar, the prerequisite is that there must be practical applications for USD0, meaning the market must recognize the value of USB0, and various exchanges must have various trading pairs for USD0, at least Binance must acknowledge its value. If the project team cannot meet this condition and does not turn USD0 into a valuable product, then the price of USUAL will never rise, as it is currently a worthless coin. It is currently in a worthless coin state.
$USUAL returns to 1 US dollar, the prerequisite is that there must be practical applications for USD0, meaning the market must recognize the value of USB0, and various exchanges must have various trading pairs for USD0, at least Binance must acknowledge its value. If the project team cannot meet this condition and does not turn USD0 into a valuable product, then the price of USUAL will never rise, as it is currently a worthless coin. It is currently in a worthless coin state.
See original
According to this trend, it is expected to drop to $0.03-$0.06, returning to its rightful value. Unfortunately, it was unexpected that BinanceLabs is operated by a few inexperienced girls, deliberately harvesting retail investors, and the losses are substantial. The peak was upon listing, yet the price continues to free fall. Would it be like this if it were a normal valuation?
According to this trend, it is expected to drop to $0.03-$0.06, returning to its rightful value. Unfortunately, it was unexpected that BinanceLabs is operated by a few inexperienced girls, deliberately harvesting retail investors, and the losses are substantial.
The peak was upon listing, yet the price continues to free fall. Would it be like this if it were a normal valuation?
--
Bearish
See original
$USUAL The head of user growth in the Chinese area resigned. To be honest, Usual played a good hand into a mess, which is closely related to the incompetence of the team. Popular track, brand endorsement, traffic support, Usual has everything, but compared with the competitor $ENA , it is really far behind. According to the current market, the price of USUSL should be similar to that of ENA, that is, more than $0.85, but unfortunately... It is a good thing that the user operation is dismissed. They don't understand user psychology at all. I hope to replace them with capable ones. {future}(USUALUSDT) {spot}(ENAUSDT)
$USUAL The head of user growth in the Chinese area resigned. To be honest, Usual played a good hand into a mess, which is closely related to the incompetence of the team.

Popular track, brand endorsement, traffic support, Usual has everything, but compared with the competitor $ENA , it is really far behind.

According to the current market, the price of USUSL should be similar to that of ENA, that is, more than $0.85, but unfortunately...

It is a good thing that the user operation is dismissed. They don't understand user psychology at all. I hope to replace them with capable ones.
See original
When will $BIO fall below 0.2 yuan and return to its true value?
When will $BIO fall below 0.2 yuan and return to its true value?
See original
$BIO is completely useless, 1.35 million are unlocked every day, {future}(BIOUSDT) It will fall to 0.1 yuan in the near future. Those who shorted this coin made a fortune, and there was basically no pull-up and no fluctuation.
$BIO is completely useless, 1.35 million are unlocked every day,
It will fall to 0.1 yuan in the near future. Those who shorted this coin made a fortune, and there was basically no pull-up and no fluctuation.
--
Bullish
See original
$ETH As a leader among mainstream coins, the price hovered around $3250 at 7 PM on January 18, meaning it has hardly increased in nearly a year. The ETH/BTC ratio has also reached its lowest point in recent months, at just 0.3167. Under the circumstances of the ETH ETF being approved and institutional funds continuously flowing in, it is impossible for ETH not to rise; the only reasonable explanation is that its price is severely undervalued. The reason for this phenomenon is that American institutions are mainly focusing their attention on Bitcoin. This means that American institutions believe that Bitcoin's current price is still not high enough, and they will not temporarily transfer too much capital from Bitcoin to ETH. Once the funds start to overflow from Bitcoin, ETH will have its day to take off. {spot}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT)
$ETH As a leader among mainstream coins, the price hovered around $3250 at 7 PM on January 18, meaning it has hardly increased in nearly a year. The ETH/BTC ratio has also reached its lowest point in recent months, at just 0.3167. Under the circumstances of the ETH ETF being approved and institutional funds continuously flowing in, it is impossible for ETH not to rise; the only reasonable explanation is that its price is severely undervalued.

The reason for this phenomenon is that American institutions are mainly focusing their attention on Bitcoin. This means that American institutions believe that Bitcoin's current price is still not high enough, and they will not temporarily transfer too much capital from Bitcoin to ETH. Once the funds start to overflow from Bitcoin, ETH will have its day to take off.
See original
$BIO At least from the current perspective, the DeSci sector basically has no popularity, and no one is discussing it on Twitter. Binance's investment in it seems to be purely for entertainment. The valuation for the bio listing is too high, having cut a significant number of investors in the Chinese market. If we consider the valuation I initially gave, which is a listing price between $0.1 and $0.2, then everyone could still make a profit, but unfortunately, the Binance platform doesn't give you that opportunity. It is expected to remain stagnant for a long time, unless DeSci becomes a hot topic at some point; it is also possible that this opportunity may never arise. {spot}(BIOUSDT)
$BIO At least from the current perspective, the DeSci sector basically has no popularity, and no one is discussing it on Twitter. Binance's investment in it seems to be purely for entertainment. The valuation for the bio listing is too high, having cut a significant number of investors in the Chinese market.

If we consider the valuation I initially gave, which is a listing price between $0.1 and $0.2, then everyone could still make a profit, but unfortunately, the Binance platform doesn't give you that opportunity.

It is expected to remain stagnant for a long time, unless DeSci becomes a hot topic at some point; it is also possible that this opportunity may never arise.
See original
$USUAL BTC has risen to 99,000, and all other altcoins have rebounded and risen, only USUSL is still in the red, and another big investor would rather lose $1 million to redeem USD0++. What does this mean? Users lack confidence and lack confidence in their team. The rules are not friendly. The project party also likes to play routines, often releasing some good news after a period of time, but it is obviously the same as the story of "The Wolf is Coming". Trust is gone, and it's a pity to play a good hand like this. As the father of Party A, it is recommended that Binance directly intervene in the operation and directly open the current operation. {future}(USDCUSDT)
$USUAL BTC has risen to 99,000, and all other altcoins have rebounded and risen, only USUSL is still in the red, and another big investor would rather lose $1 million to redeem USD0++. What does this mean? Users lack confidence and lack confidence in their team.

The rules are not friendly.

The project party also likes to play routines, often releasing some good news after a period of time, but it is obviously the same as the story of "The Wolf is Coming". Trust is gone, and it's a pity to play a good hand like this.

As the father of Party A, it is recommended that Binance directly intervene in the operation and directly open the current operation.
See original
$USUAL Here I want to raise a criticism towards the Usual team. I mentioned in a previous post that Usual lacks communication with users, and I was even confronted in French by the project team, accused of lying. So does the recent behavior of the project team indicate that what I said is not a fact? Originally, the stablecoin sector is very competitive and hot, and Usual received support from Binance, inherently carrying traffic, gaining great attention before and after its launch, starting with a good hand. However, you will find that Usual's official website lacks a forum channel for user communication, and using a third-party platform as the main communication channel is not effective, as attention is too scattered. Usual has not opened a Chinese or French Twitter account, and you cannot find Usual's official account on Binance Square. Before and after the launch, a large number of bots were sent to hype things up, which is completely not the way a good business should operate. Looking at the work history of the project team, you will find that their work experience is completely lacking. I am optimistic about the stablecoin sector, but the key is still daily operations. Comparing with the competitor $ENA 's operational capabilities, I express doubts about their team's work abilities. Confidence is more important than gold. Currently, users have lost confidence in Usual, and this is the key issue. How to restore users' confidence and repair credit is the project team's top priority.
$USUAL Here I want to raise a criticism towards the Usual team. I mentioned in a previous post that Usual lacks communication with users, and I was even confronted in French by the project team, accused of lying.

So does the recent behavior of the project team indicate that what I said is not a fact?

Originally, the stablecoin sector is very competitive and hot, and Usual received support from Binance, inherently carrying traffic, gaining great attention before and after its launch, starting with a good hand. However, you will find that Usual's official website lacks a forum channel for user communication, and using a third-party platform as the main communication channel is not effective, as attention is too scattered.

Usual has not opened a Chinese or French Twitter account, and you cannot find Usual's official account on Binance Square. Before and after the launch, a large number of bots were sent to hype things up, which is completely not the way a good business should operate.

Looking at the work history of the project team, you will find that their work experience is completely lacking. I am optimistic about the stablecoin sector, but the key is still daily operations. Comparing with the competitor $ENA 's operational capabilities, I express doubts about their team's work abilities.

Confidence is more important than gold. Currently, users have lost confidence in Usual, and this is the key issue. How to restore users' confidence and repair credit is the project team's top priority.
See original
#AIXBT、CGPT、COOKIE将上线币安 Binance new coin is no longer being invested in, the recent projects have too obvious intentions to cut leeks. Especially for Bio, I estimate a reasonable listing price of $0.1-0.2. If bought at this price, many retail investors on Binance could still make a profit, everyone would be happy. I did not expect that it would start at $1 billion, greatly overestimating the coin's value, many people took over at prices around $0.7~$0.9, and those who couldn't hold on cut their losses and left. The DeSci track, as a new field, is led by Binance in the first wave, and there is still room for imagination in the future. I am too lazy to research these projects and will not invest for the time being. {future}(AIXBTUSDT) {spot}(CGPTUSDT) {spot}(COOKIEUSDT)
#AIXBT、CGPT、COOKIE将上线币安 Binance new coin is no longer being invested in, the recent projects have too obvious intentions to cut leeks. Especially for Bio, I estimate a reasonable listing price of $0.1-0.2. If bought at this price, many retail investors on Binance could still make a profit, everyone would be happy.
I did not expect that it would start at $1 billion, greatly overestimating the coin's value, many people took over at prices around $0.7~$0.9, and those who couldn't hold on cut their losses and left.
The DeSci track, as a new field, is led by Binance in the first wave, and there is still room for imagination in the future.
I am too lazy to research these projects and will not invest for the time being.
See original
$USUAL The operation is poor, the decline is at the bottom, the USD0 exchange, such a big rule adjustment, infringing on the interests of users, was not released in advance and discussed with users, users have no idea, so it leads to stampede. The token price has fallen so badly. This is totally unexpected. The project party should interact more with users on a regular basis, and major rule adjustments should be fully discussed to let users have a bottom line. {future}(USUALUSDT)
$USUAL The operation is poor, the decline is at the bottom, the USD0 exchange, such a big rule adjustment, infringing on the interests of users, was not released in advance and discussed with users, users have no idea, so it leads to stampede.
The token price has fallen so badly. This is totally unexpected.
The project party should interact more with users on a regular basis, and major rule adjustments should be fully discussed to let users have a bottom line.
See original
Your understanding of the language is problematic. Trump has no intention of annexing Canada; rather, he said that Canada, as a country, should take responsibility for itself. The United States spends over $200 billion each year to protect Canada and also has a trade deficit. These are all advantages that Canada is taking, and the U.S. does not want to do this. Canada is not just a state of the United States. Yet, the simplified Chinese circle is spreading rumors that Trump wants to annex Canada, which is laughable.
Your understanding of the language is problematic. Trump has no intention of annexing Canada; rather, he said that Canada, as a country, should take responsibility for itself. The United States spends over $200 billion each year to protect Canada and also has a trade deficit. These are all advantages that Canada is taking, and the U.S. does not want to do this. Canada is not just a state of the United States. Yet, the simplified Chinese circle is spreading rumors that Trump wants to annex Canada, which is laughable.
KZG 口罩哥
--
After watching this video, I still think that Trump is joking about increasing the territory. I don’t know what to say. Whether it is Greenland, Panama or Canada, his request is to join the United States. The only difference is that there are military and economic methods, but the tone of discussion is very serious. If successful, this will make the United States the world’s largest country with 21,500,000 square kilometers of territory…
See original
The price of $USUAL has been halved, and $BIO will inevitably experience a similar halving. There's no other reason, the valuation is too high, and the market does not accept it. Holders who entered at 0.01-0.06 will continue to sell. Partners, be patient, and re-enter around 0.35. {future}(USUALUSDT) {future}(BIOUSDT)
The price of $USUAL has been halved, and $BIO will inevitably experience a similar halving. There's no other reason,
the valuation is too high, and the market does not accept it. Holders who entered at 0.01-0.06 will continue to sell. Partners, be patient, and re-enter around 0.35.
See original
$BTC The reason for the sharp drop in the market tonight has been found {future}(BTCUSDT) {future}(ETHUSDT) . It turned out that the three major US stock indexes all fell sharply, among which MicroStrategy fell by 9%, triggering a collective plunge in cryptocurrencies. $BTC The price is around US$93,000, so you can buy it without thinking, and you won’t lose money!
$BTC The reason for the sharp drop in the market tonight has been found
. It turned out that the three major US stock indexes all fell sharply, among which MicroStrategy fell by 9%, triggering a collective plunge in cryptocurrencies. $BTC The price is around US$93,000, so you can buy it without thinking, and you won’t lose money!
See original
$TRX Retail investors should not invest in Sun Yuchen's platform. Who can bear this humiliation? What happened: Sun Yuchen is not very famous, so I wanted to experience his platform on a whim. I added customer service Doris Lily. Since the transaction fee for ordinary users is as high as 0.2%, it is higher than Binance. So they have a rate discount for new accounts, but it is only temporary for one month. So I want to apply to fix this rate. Before I started investing, Doris repeatedly asked me how big the investment volume was. I just reported a number of 4000U. Who knew that Doris immediately turned her face, looked down on people, and drove the customer away directly, which shattered my three views. Sun Yuchen, you are usually high-profile and seem to be very capable, but the company management is a mess. Doesn't Doris represent the style of your platform? Who dares to come with such a hospitality? {future}(TRXUSDT)
$TRX Retail investors should not invest in Sun Yuchen's platform. Who can bear this humiliation?

What happened: Sun Yuchen is not very famous, so I wanted to experience his platform on a whim.

I added customer service Doris Lily. Since the transaction fee for ordinary users is as high as 0.2%, it is higher than Binance. So they have a rate discount for new accounts, but it is only temporary for one month. So I want to apply to fix this rate. Before I started investing, Doris repeatedly asked me how big the investment volume was. I just reported a number of 4000U. Who knew that Doris immediately turned her face, looked down on people, and drove the customer away directly, which shattered my three views.

Sun Yuchen, you are usually high-profile and seem to be very capable, but the company management is a mess. Doesn't Doris represent the style of your platform?

Who dares to come with such a hospitality?
See original
$BIO What does this mean? Left and right? Or are you eager to protect the market? {future}(BIOUSDT)
$BIO What does this mean? Left and right? Or are you eager to protect the market?
See original
$BIO The Curse Has Come
$BIO The Curse Has Come
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Anglea Visser zsNV
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs