The 'Bitcoin yield' of the public Bitcoin treasury companies via selling shares 'at the market' closely resembles ponzi economics (the early investors benefit from the later investors paying a premium vs assets) except that, if responsibly managed, no-one should lose everything - worst case should be the net asset value (NAV) per share.
The counter argument to the above is that selling shares at the market actually reduces the premium vs NAV, thus reducing the potential harm to the newest shareholders. They actually surpress FOMO and market inefficiency by doing it.
Whether the newer entrants to the markets make it or not depends entirely on their ability to raise money and survive any bear market (e.g. share price goes to a discount vs NAV at the same time as notes need to be refinanced)
This is all GBTC on steroids (which traded at a huge premium to NAV and started sucking in BTC from people who hoped it would continue for the x months they were locked up for) and likely creates a massive flywheel effect when Bitcoin re-enters price discovery.
Someone smarter than me will likely devise a way to analyse and rate the safety of each of these Bitcoin Treasury public entities. In the meantime, DYOR and approach with caution.