22coin_S
Verified Creator
立志成为链上科学家
Frequent Trader
1.9 Years
325 Following
42.0K+ Followers
19.9K+ Liked
1.9K+ Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
join my chnnel .and get more redpacket 🧧🧧
👉join room
👉join room
See original
The key to Plasma is not in being faster but in resembling a payment system; breaking down growth quality and the pricing logic of XPL with the latest data.
Evaluating Plasma as a typical public chain often results in conclusions focused on performance, costs, and the number of ecosystems—these general indicators are difficult to explain regarding why stablecoin payments are prioritized and why chain-level fees can be extremely low while still generating considerable fees and revenue on the application side. A more effective perspective is to view Plasma as a stablecoin settlement and credit network, examining it like a payment company in terms of scale, turnover, cost structure, and security budget.
First, look at the scale; the on-chain stablecoin scale is approximately $1.876 billion, with a change of about -6.82% over the past 7 days, and the dominant stablecoin accounts for about 82.08%.
First, look at the scale; the on-chain stablecoin scale is approximately $1.876 billion, with a change of about -6.82% over the past 7 days, and the dominant stablecoin accounts for about 82.08%.
See original
Turning Memory into Transactions, Turning Transactions into Value: The Triple Loop of Vanar Chain and the Demand Curve of VANRY
If we take a calm dissection of the public chain narrative over the past two years, we will find that most networks are competing for the same thing: throughput and low fees. Their differences often remain at the parameter level, ultimately falling into homogeneous liquidity competition. The interesting aspect of Vanar Chain lies in its attempt to shift the focus of competition from parameters to workflows, advancing blockchain from transaction ledgers to a verifiable semantic memory layer, and turning this memory layer into a product, then channeling the usage intensity of this product back into on-chain activities and token demand. This is not a narrative that can be easily explained with a slogan; it is necessary to place the technical pathway, fee model, token distribution, and commercialization rhythm on the same map to determine whether it is telling a story or building a sustainable growth flywheel.
See original
If I were a developer, how would I assess whether the Dusk Foundation is worth building applications on and how the value of the DUSK token is realized?
Ultimately, the fate of a chain largely depends on a practical issue: whether anyone is willing to build on it, whether there are users willing to use it long-term, and whether there are businesses willing to run continuously. If there are only investors and no builders, it will likely just be a passing trend.
When developers look at a chain, the first thing they often don't look at is the narrative, but rather two things. Whether the toolchain is user-friendly and whether the integration path is reliable. Especially if you are going to develop a compliance financial application, there will be more pitfalls. You need to handle identity and permissions, consider privacy, be able to audit, integrate data, settle across chains, and ensure stable performance. If any link in the chain fails, the project may die before going live.
When developers look at a chain, the first thing they often don't look at is the narrative, but rather two things. Whether the toolchain is user-friendly and whether the integration path is reliable. Especially if you are going to develop a compliance financial application, there will be more pitfalls. You need to handle identity and permissions, consider privacy, be able to audit, integrate data, settle across chains, and ensure stable performance. If any link in the chain fails, the project may die before going live.
See original
Don't just ask if DUSK can rise; I want to talk more about how it can reach the point where people are willing to hold it long-term.
I find that many people talk about DUSK in a way that is very much like discussing short-term trading, with today's rise and tomorrow's fall, focusing all on the candlestick chart. But if you look at DUSK as a foundational resource for a compliant financial network, you will care more about two things. First, whether it is being used. Second, whether its supply and demand can form a structure that can sustain itself without relying on slogans.
Let's start with supply, as it is the part that is often overlooked but can most determine long-term experience. According to public information, the maximum supply of DUSK is 1 billion pieces, which can be understood structurally as early issuance plus long-term release, with a release span of up to 36 years. My first impression of this design is that it is not doing a sprint project, but more like long-term network operation. The number 36 years is very long, meaning that inflation is not something that ends in one or two years, but it also means that the release pace is relatively smooth, making it easier for the market to establish expectations. For holders, the most critical question is not whether there is inflation, but whether inflation can be absorbed by demand.
Let's start with supply, as it is the part that is often overlooked but can most determine long-term experience. According to public information, the maximum supply of DUSK is 1 billion pieces, which can be understood structurally as early issuance plus long-term release, with a release span of up to 36 years. My first impression of this design is that it is not doing a sprint project, but more like long-term network operation. The number 36 years is very long, meaning that inflation is not something that ends in one or two years, but it also means that the release pace is relatively smooth, making it easier for the market to establish expectations. For holders, the most critical question is not whether there is inflation, but whether inflation can be absorbed by demand.
See original
How I See the Recent Rhythm of Dusk Foundation: Compliance is Not Just a Slogan; It’s Competing for a Very Difficult but Valuable Position
If you look at the Dusk Foundation as an ordinary public blockchain, it's easy to feel that it's not lively enough. It’s not like those projects that talk about ecological prosperity every day; it feels more like a team that has been tackling difficult engineering problems. However, the more I look at it, the more I feel that its choices are quite clear-headed. What it aims to do is not to attract everyone to play, but to ensure that regulated assets can truly operate on the chain, and after they are operational, they must withstand scrutiny, protect privacy, enable cross-chain settlement, and provide decent market data. Each of these requirements is not easy on its own, and when combined, it is basically a high difficulty level.
See original
Observe Vanar Chain, and it is not advisable to focus only on traditional indicators such as TVL or a short-term hotspot application. A more effective approach is to track three signals that can traverse market cycles. The first is whether on-chain interactions related to memory and queries continue to increase, especially when the market remains calm with a stable base. The second is whether the renewal and retention of paid products are improving, as this determines whether demand is sustainable. The third is whether staking participation and unstaking behavior are stable, as this determines supply elasticity and security.
If two of these three items continue to strengthen, VANRY is more likely to transition from a narrative token to a utility token. Conversely, if query-type interactions do not scale, and subscription models fail to drive retention, then price fluctuations will still be primarily determined by external sentiment, and network value capture will be long-term discounted by the market. For short-term traders, this may just be a volatility opportunity, while for long-term holders, it means that data must be used to validate rather than betting on imagination.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
If two of these three items continue to strengthen, VANRY is more likely to transition from a narrative token to a utility token. Conversely, if query-type interactions do not scale, and subscription models fail to drive retention, then price fluctuations will still be primarily determined by external sentiment, and network value capture will be long-term discounted by the market. For short-term traders, this may just be a volatility opportunity, while for long-term holders, it means that data must be used to validate rather than betting on imagination.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
See original
Regarding the Dusk Foundation, I see several common misunderstandings, so let me break them down in simple terms. Misunderstanding 1: Privacy equals anti-regulation. In fact, it is quite the opposite in institutional scenarios; privacy is meant to protect investors and transaction details within the regulatory framework, not to evade audits.
Misunderstanding 2: DUSK is just a speculative symbol. As a foundational network, the token bears the costs of resource consumption and security budget; bridge fees, transaction fees, and staking participation are what turn it into a path of practical demand. Misunderstanding 3: A bridge is just a small tool. Once a bi-directional bridge is established, assets can flow back and forth between the mainnet and external ecosystems, making it easier for developers to access liquidity and for users to migrate assets, significantly reducing ecological friction.
Misunderstanding 4: Listing on exchanges is just a game of ups and downs. For projects oriented toward compliance, an entry like Binance US is more like building a channel, which can enhance accessibility and price discovery efficiency. Misunderstanding 5: Standardization is not important. What institutions fear most is having to customize every time they connect; the clearer the interoperability and data standards, the easier it is to scale and replicate.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
Misunderstanding 2: DUSK is just a speculative symbol. As a foundational network, the token bears the costs of resource consumption and security budget; bridge fees, transaction fees, and staking participation are what turn it into a path of practical demand. Misunderstanding 3: A bridge is just a small tool. Once a bi-directional bridge is established, assets can flow back and forth between the mainnet and external ecosystems, making it easier for developers to access liquidity and for users to migrate assets, significantly reducing ecological friction.
Misunderstanding 4: Listing on exchanges is just a game of ups and downs. For projects oriented toward compliance, an entry like Binance US is more like building a channel, which can enhance accessibility and price discovery efficiency. Misunderstanding 5: Standardization is not important. What institutions fear most is having to customize every time they connect; the clearer the interoperability and data standards, the easier it is to scale and replicate.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
See original
I tried to understand the Dusk Foundation with a scenario more akin to real business. Suppose a small or medium-sized enterprise in Europe seeks financing; it has plenty of stories, but lacks smooth compliance processes, needs to verify investor identities, disclose issuance information, ensure transaction compliance, clarify settlements, and maintain audit trails. Traditional methods are inefficient and costly. If blockchain implementation only addresses tokenization without resolving compliance processes, it ultimately won't work.
Dusk's approach is more about making processes into executable rules on the chain, while also using privacy protection to keep sensitive details out of the public eye, all while retaining necessary audit entry points. Coupled with interoperability and high-quality data access, you can connect post-issuance transactions and settlements to a larger chain economy instead of being trapped in a small circle. The key here is not a single-point technology, but the end-to-end experience. Institutions are willing to adopt it if a chain can reduce their liabilities, reworks, and explanations.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
Dusk's approach is more about making processes into executable rules on the chain, while also using privacy protection to keep sensitive details out of the public eye, all while retaining necessary audit entry points. Coupled with interoperability and high-quality data access, you can connect post-issuance transactions and settlements to a larger chain economy instead of being trapped in a small circle. The key here is not a single-point technology, but the end-to-end experience. Institutions are willing to adopt it if a chain can reduce their liabilities, reworks, and explanations.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
See original
Chat DUSK I don't really like just focusing on the ups and downs; I prefer to do a simple three-piece check. The first piece is to see if there are any hard indicators.
Don't just look at partnership announcements; focus on the number of settlements related to compliant assets on-chain, active addresses, and trading frequency. It’s best to see a stable increase over several weeks. The second piece is whether the liquidity channels are healthier. After opening entry points like Binance US, has the transaction depth, spread, and deposit/withdrawal experience improved? This determines whether institutions and large funds dare to enter. The third piece is whether the token supply and demand structure can move towards balance.
A maximum supply of 1 billion tokens and long-term releases mean that supply will continue to enter the market. Only when on-chain consumption, bridging fees, and staking lock-up all grow together will DUSK resemble an infrastructure asset rather than just a thematic one. Risks must also be stated clearly; the pace of compliant finance's implementation is inherently slow, and market expectations often run ahead of delivery, leading to glaring short-term volatility. My advice is to manage emotions with indicators, not to manage indicators with emotions.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
Don't just look at partnership announcements; focus on the number of settlements related to compliant assets on-chain, active addresses, and trading frequency. It’s best to see a stable increase over several weeks. The second piece is whether the liquidity channels are healthier. After opening entry points like Binance US, has the transaction depth, spread, and deposit/withdrawal experience improved? This determines whether institutions and large funds dare to enter. The third piece is whether the token supply and demand structure can move towards balance.
A maximum supply of 1 billion tokens and long-term releases mean that supply will continue to enter the market. Only when on-chain consumption, bridging fees, and staking lock-up all grow together will DUSK resemble an infrastructure asset rather than just a thematic one. Risks must also be stated clearly; the pace of compliant finance's implementation is inherently slow, and market expectations often run ahead of delivery, leading to glaring short-term volatility. My advice is to manage emotions with indicators, not to manage indicators with emotions.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
See original
If you are a developer, you must understand that feeling of collapse. You want to create an on-chain financial application, but as soon as you open the requirements list, identity, permissions, privacy, auditing, cross-chain, data sources, any one of these can drag the team into overtime and make them doubt life.
Many public chains only provide you with a runtime environment; the rest is up to you to piece together. I think the smart thing about Dusk Foundation is that it treats these elements as system capabilities to be broken down, first ensuring a stable execution environment and settlement layer, then layering stronger privacy and compliance capabilities on top, while also standardizing cross-chain and data access.
For developers, this means you don’t have to build a set of bridges and oracle interfaces for every product you make, nor do you have to write compliance logic into a pile of non-reusable business code. Additionally, with bidirectional bridges connecting the mainnet and external ecosystems, you can more smoothly access existing liquidity and tools without waiting for a new ecosystem to grow all the necessary support from scratch. Many people love to discuss whether technology is flashy, but when it comes to implementation, saving engineering costs is the real key.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
Many public chains only provide you with a runtime environment; the rest is up to you to piece together. I think the smart thing about Dusk Foundation is that it treats these elements as system capabilities to be broken down, first ensuring a stable execution environment and settlement layer, then layering stronger privacy and compliance capabilities on top, while also standardizing cross-chain and data access.
For developers, this means you don’t have to build a set of bridges and oracle interfaces for every product you make, nor do you have to write compliance logic into a pile of non-reusable business code. Additionally, with bidirectional bridges connecting the mainnet and external ecosystems, you can more smoothly access existing liquidity and tools without waiting for a new ecosystem to grow all the necessary support from scratch. Many people love to discuss whether technology is flashy, but when it comes to implementation, saving engineering costs is the real key.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
See original
I recently saw the updates from Dusk Foundation and had a strong feeling that it is gradually putting back the compliance financial chain's essential components, rather than just chasing trends. Let's discuss three very practical points.
The first is that the liquidity entry has become smoother; DUSK will enter trading channels like Binance US, which are more compliant, in October 2025, making it more friendly for American users and market makers.
The second is that cross-ecosystem usage has become more convenient. After the two-way bridge between the mainnet and BSC is established, assets will no longer be a one-way migration. The bridging cost is also very clear, with a fee of 1 DUSK per transaction. This predictable minor friction is more suitable for long-term tools.
The third is that institutional links are starting to take a standardized route. Regulated market infrastructures like NPEX are introducing interoperability and data components. The direction is clear: to connect compliant issuance, settlement, and data publishing into a production-level process. Additionally, on the token side, the hard information is that the maximum supply is 1 billion tokens, with a long-term release span, meaning it is more like an infrastructure budget rather than a short sprint project. Short-term excitement will come and go, but once the essential components are in place, there will be a basis for discussing large-scale adoption.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
The first is that the liquidity entry has become smoother; DUSK will enter trading channels like Binance US, which are more compliant, in October 2025, making it more friendly for American users and market makers.
The second is that cross-ecosystem usage has become more convenient. After the two-way bridge between the mainnet and BSC is established, assets will no longer be a one-way migration. The bridging cost is also very clear, with a fee of 1 DUSK per transaction. This predictable minor friction is more suitable for long-term tools.
The third is that institutional links are starting to take a standardized route. Regulated market infrastructures like NPEX are introducing interoperability and data components. The direction is clear: to connect compliant issuance, settlement, and data publishing into a production-level process. Additionally, on the token side, the hard information is that the maximum supply is 1 billion tokens, with a long-term release span, meaning it is more like an infrastructure budget rather than a short sprint project. Short-term excitement will come and go, but once the essential components are in place, there will be a basis for discussing large-scale adoption.
@Dusk $DUSK
#Dusk
See original
Many people are not yet aware of one thing:
KING and WARR are not two stories, they are the same ARToken asset track.
One is running in the subscription, and the other just entered the subscription phase,
what the system is verifying is not the asset, but the ability.
Next, ARToken can be mined on the Ulitiland platform,
the more assets there are, the longer ARToken runs,
the value supported by ARTX becomes more solid.
dapp.ultiland.io
@ULTILAND #Ultiland $ARTX
KING and WARR are not two stories, they are the same ARToken asset track.
One is running in the subscription, and the other just entered the subscription phase,
what the system is verifying is not the asset, but the ability.
Next, ARToken can be mined on the Ulitiland platform,
the more assets there are, the longer ARToken runs,
the value supported by ARTX becomes more solid.
dapp.ultiland.io
@ULTILAND #Ultiland $ARTX
See original
Thank you for the $1000 reward from Binance, it's so generous. Binance Square is making great progress, listening to suggestions and improving very quickly. Previously, everyone said that the rewards were distributed too slowly and could not see the motivation, so the Square immediately optimized it. I'm touched 🥹. No more to say, I'll be living in the Square from now on
@币安广场 @Yi He
@币安广场 @Yi He
See original
I increasingly believe that what retail investors ultimately purchase is not technical details, but a more worry-free path for funds.
When money runs back and forth on the chain, the quality of experience directly translates into cost. Cost isn’t just transaction fees; it also includes whether to prepare fuel for transfers beforehand, whether to compete for priority fees during congestion, whether to worry about black swan events with bridges in cross-chain transactions, and whether to take extra steps for withdrawals and deposits. I used to think these were trivial matters, but later realized that small matters add up to significant issues, especially for small capital, where friction holds a higher proportion, and making a mistake could wipe out a week's earnings.
Plasma positions itself on the stablecoin payment line, equating friction as the number one enemy. It doesn’t resemble those chains that aim to swallow all scenarios; rather, it focuses first on one thing, treating stablecoins as primary assets and striving to make the transfer experience akin to everyday payments. For retail investors, this isn’t a grand narrative but rather a concrete issue encountered daily. Can stablecoins be moved to desired locations at low cost? Can settlements be completed without hassle? Can the flow of funds become predictable? This determines whether I will actually use it, rather than just shouting slogans when the price rises.
Plasma positions itself on the stablecoin payment line, equating friction as the number one enemy. It doesn’t resemble those chains that aim to swallow all scenarios; rather, it focuses first on one thing, treating stablecoins as primary assets and striving to make the transfer experience akin to everyday payments. For retail investors, this isn’t a grand narrative but rather a concrete issue encountered daily. Can stablecoins be moved to desired locations at low cost? Can settlements be completed without hassle? Can the flow of funds become predictable? This determines whether I will actually use it, rather than just shouting slogans when the price rises.
See original
btc or gold?
See original
Token and Liquidity Engineering of Dusk Foundation
If we view the Dusk Foundation as an infrastructure for regulated financial businesses, then the evaluation of the Dusk Foundation should not only focus on technology releases, but also on more 'financialized' issues: how liquidity enters the system, how value is used within the system, how supply releases are absorbed, and how risks are layered and isolated. Many crypto projects perform well technically, but fail to handle liquidity engineering and token engineering properly, leading to a typical failure: external trading is bustling, but on-chain usage is sparse, token prices are driven by short-term trading, and the network's utility value cannot benefit the token economy. The Dusk Foundation is building a layered structure with DuskDS and DuskEVM, where DUSK simultaneously bears the security budget and the usage budget, making the success or failure of token engineering more significant for the entire roadmap.
Login to explore more contents