@JatevoId launched a new tool https://t.co/SPSe0Im7Xw, with AI features, text to website, one-click website landing page generation. This is what I tested to create a buyer's website. For small businesses, this effect is really sufficient, and it can also be deployed (I didn't buy a domain name, you can try the deployment process).
@JatevoId's route is now very clear, with two main business lines:
1. ToC application matrix: building various AI applications by themselves, such as the already launched AI-generated websites and AI news push notifications. These applications can be charged for, requiring users to pay with $JTVO.
2. ToB AI capability leasing: leasing their surplus large model inference capabilities to small teams developing applications, for example, the already launched $Yuna. ToB services are also paid for using $JTVO.
This business model is completely feasible. Additionally, the dev is highly productive and places great importance on market value management. Let's wish him success!
High school dropout full-time trading coins, this is the second one I've seen, indicating that quite a few kids are doing this. What does everyone think? If it were my child, I would be concerned.
What’s Happening with the horrifying dump of $JTVO @JatevoId ?
I just spoke with @lucaxyzz — he's understandably upset, but I want to help to give a quick breakdown on with the recent dump on JTVO👇
JTVO had strong early backing from a large community (thousands of members). The community collectively hold significant supply.
Today, a member of that community launched a new app called $Finna, along with a token lunched on @believe_capital
Luca publicly criticized Finna (https://t.co/7IXT15wqLT) , calling it a copycat of @yunabite — a project incubated by JTVO doing similar business as finna.
This angered the original community, and many of them collectively dumped their JTVO bags in response.
The market is already fragile, and this triggered panic selling from holders unaware of the context —> leading to a cascading dump.
There are now rumors of a dev rug. This is false. Dev is still here. Dev wallets:
8ZRpQFGybD3cUBtF9wPEaaKt9yMmkfGa6EcGj9dM5LWG
4WYxd4spp6ejMCepAXa2BNRqGbw9KLU8XHXm1y3brJn2
My takes:
1. This wasn’t a rug. It was a social conflict + bad timing.
2. $finna maybe a competitor to $yuna but is no way comparable to $JTVO . Because JTVO is a platform to serve AI applications like @yunabite , and finna is just one use case of such AI applications.
You can think applications like yuna as consumers of JTVO's inference services. yuna needs to pay JTVO to use their services. More apps like yuna, more revenue to JTVO, thus better price to $JTVO the token.
What’s Happening with the horrifying dump of $JTVO @JatevoId ?
I just spoke with @lucaxyzz — he's understandably upset, but I want to help to give a quick breakdown on with the recent dump on JTVO👇
JTVO had strong early backing from a large community (thousands of members). The community collectively hold significant supply.
Today, a member of that community launched a new app called $Finna, along with a token lunched on @believe_capital
Luca publicly criticized Finna (https://t.co/7IXT15wqLT) , calling it a copycat of @yunabite — a project incubated by JTVO that hasn’t launched its token yet.
This angered the original community, and many of them collectively dumped their JTVO bags in response.
The market is already fragile, and this triggered panic selling from holders unaware of the context —> leading to a cascading dump.
There are now rumors of a dev rug. This is false. Dev is still here. Dev wallets:
8ZRpQFGybD3cUBtF9wPEaaKt9yMmkfGa6EcGj9dM5LWG
4WYxd4spp6ejMCepAXa2BNRqGbw9KLU8XHXm1y3brJn2
My takes:
1. This wasn’t a rug. It was a social conflict + bad timing.
2. $finna maybe a competitor to $yuna but is no way comparable to $JTVO . Because JTVO is a platform to serve AI applications like @yunabite , and finna is just one use case of such AI applications.
You can think applications like yuna as consumers of JTVO's inference services. yuna needs to pay JTVO to use their services. More apps like yuna, more revenue to JTVO, thus better price to $JTVO the token.
What’s Happening with the horrifying dump of $JTVO @JatevoId ?
I just spoke with @lucaxyzz — he's understandably upset, but I want to help to give a quick breakdown on with the recent dump on JTVO👇
JTVO had strong early backing from a large community (thousands of members). The community collectively hold significant supply.
Today, a member of that community launched a new app called $Finna, along with a token lunched on @believe_capital
Luca publicly criticized Finna (https://t.co/7IXT15wqLT) , calling it a copycat of @yunabite — a project incubated by JTVO that hasn’t launched its token yet.
This angered the original community, and many of them collectively dumped their JTVO bags in response.
The market is already fragile, and this triggered panic selling from holders unaware of the context —> leading to a cascading dump.
There are now rumors of a dev rug. This is false. Dev is still here. Dev wallet: 8ZRpQFGybD3cUBtF9wPEaaKt9yMmkfGa6EcGj9dM5LWG
My takes:
1. This wasn’t a rug. It was a social conflict + bad timing.
2. $finna maybe a competitor to $yuna but is no way comparable to $JTVO . Because JTVO is a platform to serve AI applications like @yunabite , and finna is just one use case of such AI applications.
You can think applications like yuna as consumers of JTVO's inference services. yuna needs to pay JTVO to use their services. More apps like yuna, more revenue to JTVO, thus better price to $JTVO the token.
$JTVO dev chatted with me for a while. The situation is roughly that a community of over a thousand people was led to buy JTVO, and recently there has been some conflict between the community leader and the dev.
Someone from the community quickly copied an app called finna using Gemini's API. Finna is a complete copy of JTVO's recently incubated new project, yuna. Then the community leader called on everyone to buy finna, and a group of people collectively dumped JTVO to buy finna.
This concentrated dumping caused panic, and other people who didn't know what was happening were scared and started to liquidate their holdings.
@JatevoId @lucaxyzz dev is probably feeling very confused right now and doesn't have good crisis management.
I took a look at the recent sell orders of $JTVO, some are at a loss and busy cutting losses, and some are switching positions to chase finna
wtf finna 😂
The reason is that JTVO has released an app for analyzing nutrition from images, and finna has also made a similar app. But this does not mean that the two projects are the same.
Essentially, JTVO is a platform that provides large model resources for rent, allowing the use of AI capabilities for any application; this nutrition analysis app is an incubated product, just a demonstration use case.
This year, there is a core goal, which is to upgrade my investment strategy.
The biggest shock in recent years has been gradually understanding the unique thinking of some top investors.
For example, this year you often hear news saying that the ancient whales of BTC and ETH have awakened, selling chips that they bought a long time ago, which have not moved for over a decade. They may have only invested a few tens of thousands of dollars many years ago, and now it has turned into millions or tens of millions of dollars.
I often think, if it were me, could I hold on? I cannot hold on. So where is our difference?
Many people like to tease, as if 'holding on' is a random event. It seems that most people can hold on, and you don't have to think about why you can't hold on.
But I think it's the opposite. On the contrary, the poorer you are, the more important it is to think about this matter. There are only a few paths to fundamentally change your economic situation: 1. Large capital steady rolling (which you don't have), 2. High risk high multiples (which tests mindset and skills), 3. Low risk high multiples (the execution difficulty is minimal, the only threshold is information and cognition).
The path of 3 is a very cost-effective path. No matter how poor a person is, squeezing out ten thousand or twenty thousand in idle funds is always possible, right? Sticking to not using the investment funds for ten years is always possible, right? Improving cognition is indeed difficult, but the cost is low; you mainly pay with time.
Looking at some public cases of early investors who still hold on, we can find very obvious patterns:
For example, in 2013, Wang Xing revealed on Fanfou that he bought some Bitcoin. He said, "I have no time to study deeply, nor do I have the desire for speculative profits; I just think this idea is too amazing and is destined to be recorded in the history of human civilization." He also stated that he didn't buy much, just felt he had to participate a little.
Another example is Bonk soaring in 2024; one user who received an early share never sold out. When it was announced to be listed on Binance, he sold everything and wrote a long article on Twitter sharing his journey. He had a thesis on Bonk's possible success. When a major positive news of 'being listed on Binance' appeared, he believed that there was already significant good news + the current profits were too much for him, so he decided to cash out completely, regardless of how much it might rise afterwards.
When the chip value is low, objectively: buying purely out of appreciation, not being stingy with one's costs, and not investing everything due to fantasies of getting rich.
When the chip value is high, subjectively: selling purely out of one's needs, not comparing or showing off, not caring about selling at a peak.
Diamond hands have always been effective; what fails is the diamond hands purely centered on oneself and built on illusions.
This is a strategy that ordinary people can easily imitate. For example, if you are a salaried worker with a stable income. In your spare time, be a bit more curious, have a more open mindset, and invest a little in something special when you encounter it. Do not sell until this investment has risen to a level that can change your life; this is entirely doable.
If you persist in practicing this discipline, even without becoming wealthy, it will be a very transforming experience, freeing us from the 'poor mindset'—thinking in a longer-term way, and not being bound by the illusion of money.
Recently, there has been talk about the counterfeit season happening in the US stock market, and the on-chain environment is extremely desolate. I wonder if those still holding on are feeling anxious?
For me, I will not leave the chain. However, I have also kept my risk very low. I only invest about 10% to 15% of the funds I had after escaping the last market peak on-chain.
The environment on-chain is characterized by extreme volatility, which inherently carries leverage. Pursuing asymmetric risk with small positions on-chain is the most rational approach. Of course, there are some chosen ones who can handle large amounts of capital even in high volatility; that’s just their fate. One should be clear about whether they possess the necessary conditions.
Investing on-chain during this currently bleak period, if a new market trend emerges within three months, there could be significant returns. If not, the losses won't be too drastic. That’s my plan.
Should one follow the hot money to shift fields? This heavily depends on personal character. Chasing different waves to rotate has the advantage of never having to sit on the sidelines, but the downside is that if you run slow, you’ll keep getting hit.
Based on my understanding of myself, long-term investments in the stock market with large funds and playing on-chain with small funds is the most suitable combination.
For most people, mastering a specific skill is sufficient; having one strong ability is enough to thrive until it becomes ineffective, and there’s no need to expand too many skills too soon.
The market on-chain, if it doesn't come this year, will come next year. My habit is to always isolate and reserve living expenses for over three years; I think that should be ample. As long as one continues to stay in the game, there will be infinite possibilities. We are playing a game of probabilities in investing; no matter how accurately you predict, there will always be black swan risks, so it's best not to put all your eggs in one basket.
A boy in high school received a letter from a girl at another school, which was circulated among the whole class. One sentence read, 'You always give me hope, but then leave me in despair,' which left a deep impression on us and made us laugh to death.
Now trading cryptocurrencies feels just like that. The market is a scumbag!!
Both being launchpad-type products, believe and virtual/bn alpha reflect significantly different operational philosophies.
Believe currently lacks a strong operational mechanism; at most, it has only prevented snipers. The so-called flywheel, although Ben promised, has yet to be pushed forward. I believe that even if it is eventually launched, it will not be very refined. It won't be like virtual/alpha, which is a perfect product where every pore exudes cleverness.
Veteran players in the crypto space are already adept at creating a refined product; the mechanisms are continuously improved, and success is inevitable, but the core is outdated.
What makes believe good is its uncertainty and openness. There is no mechanism that can guarantee its success; if it succeeds, we do not know where the upper limit lies. What they want to do is something that crypto native OGs would not think of.
Depin, AI, and the further integration of tradfi. Let go of the sense of superiority of crypto natives and embrace the new crypto space.
The zeta team has recently rebranded to bullet, aiming to create decentralized derivatives trading for the Solana ecosystem, focusing on trading processing speed. Founder Tristan is a veteran from the FTX era, and the project's investors include Wintermute, Jump, the Solana Foundation, Toly, and Mert, all of whom are core forces in the Solana ecosystem.
The current market cap of the zex token is over 20 million, with an FDV of 120 million. In contrast, Hyperliquid has a market cap of 13 billion and an FDV of 40 billion. The price difference is enormous, with the FDV being less than 1% of the hype.
Kled has faced a serious public relations crisis these past few days. The cause is that people discovered Avi sold 800K of Kled, and of course, at the same time, Avi announced a 500K repurchase plan.
From day one, Kled has been surrounded by controversy, and this time, those who dislike Kled have come together even more vehemently, pointing out issues such as his hairstyle, being Indian, and even suspecting that all his collaboration proof images are photoshopped.🤣
Regardless, if you still believe, now is a good time to get on board.