@kava Subscription settlement and regional clearing of the “Front-end EVM, Back-end IBC” paradigm
Cross-border subscription and regional clearing are extremely sensitive to “payment certainty.” @kava uses EVM Co-Chain to retain the front-end Solidity process and wallet experience, while Cosmos Co-Chain undertakes IBC clearing and treasury management, Translator maps accounts and assets, making “Front-end EVM, Back-end IBC” a reusable template.
A SaaS platform keeps user contracts and payments on the EVM side, while moving regional taxes and agent commissions to the Cosmos treasury; at the end of the month, receipts are aligned according to “batch hash - block height - IBC path,” and customer service no longer explains “when will it arrive.” Organizational benefits are seen on both ends: R&D and auditing are done once, while operations flexibly adjust accounts using routing weights.
Three points to evaluate the effectiveness of migration: whether retention and GMV on the EVM side have increased, whether the distribution of IBC arrival delays has converged, and whether the cross-domain clearing template has shortened the onboarding cycle for new regions. If top wallets and stablecoins are seamlessly connected on both sides, this paradigm will shift from “usable” to “default”
