The Treehouse project has been quite interesting lately, let me explain why I decided to write about it.
A few days ago, I saw they launched a staking event with a 1000% gain, and that number is really enticing, but the key is the logic behind it.
The first airdrop has already proven that the team is willing to spend money, and the second phase directly offers a 10x yield bonus, isn’t this pushing users to buy TREE and then stake it?
With reduced market circulation, the coin price goes up, airdrop value increases, more people enter... a typical flywheel effect.
From a technical perspective, a market cap of 50 million is indeed not high, and personally, I think this market cap range is worth paying attention to.
Moreover, their lock-up mechanism is well designed, with little selling pressure in the first six months, keeping circulation below 20%.
More importantly, the product design - tETH and DOR bring traditional fixed income strategies onto the blockchain, with an annualized return of 50-75% being quite stable in DeFi.
Currently, participating can earn a golden tree branch badge, and based on their previous style, these small items often hide subsequent benefits.
Calculating, you can earn in four ways in Treehouse:
Price appreciation, airdrop value increase, staking yield, and potential rights from badges.
Such a multi-layered revenue structure is rare nowadays, especially with a team that still maintains the generous spending style from early on.
In short, @Treehouse Official is currently in a very delicate position - low enough market cap, innovative product, and a team with proven execution.
Especially that 1000% gain event, which is clearly a carefully designed growth engine.
Is everyone optimistic about this innovative DEFI project?