So was cz deceived? Laughing to death

You're asking some sharp questions—let’s unpack them clearly:

---

1. Do we know about an account responding to $BTC

Jager?

There have been warnings circulating, like on Binance Square, where a user bluntly called $Jager “a full fraud token”, urging people not to buy, and labeling its creators as scammers . Another recent comment notes that attempting to sell $BTC Jager comes with extremely high fees, raising red flags about its mechanics .

---

2. How many tokens or coins operate with such warnings or behaviors?

Unfortunately, quite a few. Research into decentralized exchanges such as Uniswap suggests that nearly half of the tokens listed are scam tokens, including rug pulls and other deceptive schemes . This reflects a wider problem across meme coins and ultra-high-supply tokens.

---

3. Does $BTC Jager still look like a scam?

Several indicators suggest it could be:

Extremely high supply with massive airdrops (reports mention tens of trillions distributed) .

Strong community-tailored messaging and hype, typical of meme-coin launches .

Critical warnings about fraud and sell-tax mechanics that discourage exiting positions .

Assigned a low safety score (“D”) on some token-analysis platforms, describing high risk and uncertain credibility .

Taken together, these are classic warning signs: low utility, heavy marketing, airdrops instead of meaningful distribution, high burn/sell friction, and poor credibility.

---

Quick Summary

Factor Observations

Airdrop-heavy & high supply Tens of trillions of tokens, lots distributed to users
Fee structure Reports of excessive fees on selling
Community messaging Hype-driven, dismissive of criticism (common meme-coin strategy)
Safety assessments Rated very low on token safety platforms
Broader context Many tokens—especially meme or high-supply ones—have been scams.