【Reducing Information Asymmetry, A Brief Discussion on Binance Alpha's Risk Control Issues】
Regarding account bans, the official stance is the same for all users. In the past, if specific risk control rules (triggers) were triggered, accounts might be directly banned; however, now the system employs a more humanized comprehensive assessment mechanism, similar to a more comprehensive "deduction system".
So, why do we mainly hear complaints from ordinary players about their accounts being unjustly banned, but rarely see studios speaking out? The reasons are mainly twofold:
1. Studios have a stronger awareness of counter-surveillance: They usually understand risk avoidance better than ordinary users (strong "anti-witch" awareness), thus the probability of being banned is relatively low (excluding the "tech guys" who abuse cheats).
2. Studio behavior is more discreet: They rarely voice their concerns on public platforms, and relevant information is usually shared only within small circles.
Additionally, regarding network and fund operation precautions:
Network Environment: Practical tests show that connecting several devices under the same IP usually poses no problem. However, if one IP address is associated with dozens of devices, it can easily trigger risk control.
Fund Operations: It is crucial to ensure isolation of transfers in and out, avoid frequent trading, prohibit inter-account transfers, and strictly forbid "funds running on trains" behavior (which was a major risk control hotspot previously).