When both AI Chain and Game Chain use ERA, the value of this token may need to be calculated based on 'Multi-Chain GDP'.
Caldera will launch 3 new chains next month: one connected to real-world logistics called Supply Chain Chain, one focused on social interactions in the metaverse called Social Chain, and another dedicated to running large AI models called AI Max Chain—at the launch ceremony of each chain, there is a mandatory option: use ERA to distribute airdrops to early users. This means that the use case of ERA is shifting from 'paying Gas' to 'a universal point system in a multi-chain ecosystem'.
Imagine the future: settling cross-border logistics with ERA on the Supply Chain Chain, earning discounts; tipping streamers with ERA on the Social Chain, unlocking exclusive skins; training models with ERA on the AI Max Chain, gaining priority access to computing power—each of these scenarios that materializes increases the demand for ERA. Just as the US dollar relies on global trade circulation, ERA is becoming increasingly important through 'inter-chain trade' in the multi-chain ecosystem.
Right now, ERA is only 1 dollar; does anyone think it's expensive? But look at the speed of ecosystem expansion: the number of chains will triple by 2024, and in 2025, there are plans to connect traditional financial chains (integrating bank data), at which point ERA may become a competitor to the 'on-chain US dollar'. Veteran players have already started 'stocking up on tokens + experiencing new chains': every time a new chain is launched, they interact to earn rewards, both benefiting from airdrops and securing future ecological dividends—this isn't speculation; it's clearly a strategy for 'original shares in the multi-chain era'!
