Several international media outlets have circulated newly released satellite images clearly showing significant damage to a sensitive Russian naval base used for nuclear submarines, following the tsunami triggered by the powerful earthquake that struck the Kamchatka Peninsula in eastern Russia a few days ago.
Images published by Umbra Space reveal noticeable deformation in one of the baseās piers, believed to have been displaced or detached due to massive tsunami waves. Reports indicate that the damaged site is the Rybachiy base ā one of the most critical hubs for Russiaās Pacific nuclear submarine fleet.
š§ But wait... Didnāt we raise a suspicious question yesterday?
In our post yesterday, we boldly asked:
> "Since Trump claimed he deployed two nuclear submarines near Russian shores, could the recent earthquake and tsunami be caused by an underwater nuclear test?"
And now, with the release of satellite evidence confirming damage to a Russian nuclear facility, this theory can no longer be brushed aside. Was the quake natural? Or is it linked to undisclosed military activity? Did the presence of U.S. nuclear subs in the Pacific play a hidden role in this disaster?
š What we know so far:
The 8.8-magnitude quake struck suddenly and unusually powerfully.
Satellite images show clear structural distortion in the naval pier.
Submarines were reportedly not docked at the time, avoiding direct damage.
Russian authorities are still assessing the full extent of the damage.
Trump recently stated he had deployed two nuclear submarines in "strategic" positions near Russia.
āļøSo are we dealing with a natural disaster... or the first signs of a covert underwater conflict?
āļø We still donāt have all the answers, but this development lends serious weight to our theory ā which yesterday seemed bold and maybe far-fetchedā¦ but today, feels disturbingly plausible.
š Stay tuned for further updates and share your thoughts ā do you still believe this was purely "natural"?
