To be honest, I wasn't familiar with Master Yinle before. I heard he has been the abbot of Baima Temple for 20 years and was recently 'invited' to take over as the abbot of Shaolin Temple after Shi Yongxin got into trouble. My first reaction was: Shaolin Temple really wants to turn over a new leaf. Why do I say this? Shi Yongxin's previous approach has turned Shaolin Temple from a sacred place of Buddhism into a 'tourist destination for martial monks' and a 'monk entertainment company.' Terms like 'Shaolin Temple Group' and 'Shaolin Temple Global Chain' sound nice as if they promote Chinese culture, but frankly, they have commercialized the pure land of Buddhism too much, making ordinary people feel uncomfortable. Master Yinle is clearly not of that sort. He hails from Henan, has long practiced and managed at Baima Temple, is low-key, doesn't engage in sensational news, and doesn't rely on martial arts performances to gain fame. Although Baima Temple is not as famous as Shaolin Temple, it is recognized by the older generation of believers for its purity, rules, and adherence to precepts. I have watched his previous interviews; he talked the most about 'observing precepts,' 'spreading the Dharma,' and 'not commercializing.' Even when a reporter asked him about Shaolin Temple’s commercial approach, he brushed it off without giving an opinion—this shows that he has a stance but doesn't want to make enemies. In short, such a person taking office means he is here to 'clean up the mess.' From the temple's perspective, with Yinle taking office, there may be these changes: 1. Commercial activities will be scaled back and will not be as ostentatious; the previous IP peripherals, film and television authorizations, and martial monk performance groups may gradually weaken, returning to the essence of Buddhism. 2. Management may become more transparent and rule-bound; the era of 'one person making all the decisions' like Shi Yongxin's may be over, and the voice of the two series of the public (the monks in the temple) will carry more weight. 3. The image will slowly revert to a 'pure land of Buddhism'; at least in future news headlines about Shaolin Temple, there will be fewer 'business war' elements and more 'cultivation' flavor. Of course, it may not change too quickly. Think about it, how much has Shaolin Temple earned through commercialization in recent years, with various intertwined interests behind it—Master Yinle won't be able to clean it all up overnight. But his attitude and background at least indicate one thing: the higher-ups want to 'change the atmosphere.' Personally, I am quite looking forward to it. It’s not that Shaolin Temple shouldn’t make a living, but there should be a limit. After all, that is the facade of Chinese Buddhism; it should still be a little purer.