In the past, getting airdrops was about:

• Who knew the earliest

• Who has more wallets

• Who interacts more

Now, getting airdrops is about:

Is this address trustworthy? Is it worthy of rewards? Is it worthy of being selected?

And whether you harvest or not is no longer important.

Because the on-chain has entered the era of 'behavior screening'.

What the project party wants to see now is:

• Are you repeatedly harvesting?

• Is your interaction meaningless random clicking?

• Did you withdraw your tokens and run away after harvesting?

• Have you participated in voting, governance, locking, retention...

The most critical change is:

The project party can not only see but also investigate, verify, and write execution logic into contracts based on this.

Why? Because of Lagrange (LA)

📌 What it does is actually very simple but very critical:

Previous on-chain projects have 'amnesia'—they cannot see the historical behavior of addresses.

So airdrops rely entirely on guesswork, either simple snapshots or centralized queries.

Lagrange directly rewrites the rules of the game:

1. User behavior → SQL query → ZK proof

2. Project contract → Proof of call → Qualification judgment

3. Reward distribution → Automatic execution → Trustless

Who has harvested? Who has harvested well? Who has harvested sustainably? Who has harvested quality? All is clear on-chain.

🎯 Let me give a few examples of changes that are happening in reality:

Lagrange's logic is no longer about 'whether or not' but about 'is it worth it'.

🧠 Why is this important?

Because:

• The project party wants to distribute less sugar and distribute it accurately.

• Users want to prove they are not Bots

• DAOs want to set weights based on real participation

• Protocols want to define interest rates, limits, levels... based on historical behavior.

And all of these things that couldn't be done in the past can now be completed on-chain.

ZK is not just a decoration; Lagrange makes it truly become the foundation of the on-chain 'behavior scoring system'.

💰 So what is LA as a token, what role does it play?

• Payment behavior query + ZK generation cost

• Node incentives + Network governance + Service fees

• Re-staking participation certificates linked to EigenLayer

• Measurement units for the calling cost of a modular development platform

You only need to understand one thing:

In the future, every reward system, behavior system, and identity system on-chain will need a 'behavior verification engine'.

And this engine is currently only running one: Lagrange.

📉 So why hasn't it exploded yet?

Because it is not a short-term concept, not a plot twist, and not based on airdrop wealth.

It is more like a 'future on-chain public facility',

What you see now is just the foundation; the real construction period is yet to come.

📣 To conclude in one sentence:

In the on-chain world, interaction is not for harvesting rewards,

Is writing the historical resume of 'who you are'.

And Lagrange is the HR department that verifies the authenticity of your credentials.

👇 Do you think future airdrops will depend on early knowledge or on behavior quality?

#Lagrange @Lagrange Official Welcome to chat in the comments! $LA