Here's a Binance Square–style post based on your article — concise, insightful, and formatted for crypto-savvy readers:
🚨 Peter Schiff Questions Bitcoin’s Scarcity – Is It All Just Unit Framing?
Economist Peter Schiff has stirred debate again, this time on X, by questioning the perception of Bitcoin’s scarcity.
He posed a scenario:
What if Bitcoin had a supply of 21 billion instead of 21 million… and each unit had 100,000 satoshis instead of 100 million?
Schiff argues:
The number 21 million is arbitrary.
The true supply is 2.1 quadrillion satoshis – the smallest indivisible unit.
Therefore, Bitcoin's scarcity is just a perception, shaped by how units are framed.
📉 Is this a threat to Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative?
💥 Bitcoiners disagree:
Scarcity isn’t about unit names — the satoshi cap is still hard-coded.
Increasing divisibility ≠ increasing supply.
It’s like slicing a pizza more — not getting more pizza.
Bottom line: Schiff challenges perception, not the protocol. Bitcoin$BTC ’s true scarcity lies in the hard cap of 2.1 quadrillion satoshis — and that hasn’t changed.
🧠 Is Bitcoin's scarcity just a psychological trick — or fundamental economics?
Drop your thoughts 👇