Anoma is not just a privacy protocol, it is more like a 'self-correcting' Web3.
Once upon a time, when we talked about Web3, we talked about freedom, decentralization, and individual sovereignty.
But slowly, we have been led away from our original intentions by habits:
Public transparency of addresses has become the norm, wallet behaviors are categorized, interactions are scored, and every step on the chain feels like 'quantifying whether you deserve to be rewarded'.
Privacy has become a luxury;
Sovereignty is packaged as 'interaction incentives';
Even anonymity has become a sort of 'speculative label'.
#Anoma 's emergence is not just about 'protecting data', but seems to remind us:
A truly free system should allow individuals to hide, negotiate, rather than be defined.
In this increasingly 'transparent yet incomprehensible' on-chain world,
Anoma shifts the focus from 'address behavior' back to 'human intention'.
It is not a tool for hackers, but rather leaves a bit of space for those who still believe in dignity, negotiation, and boundaries.
Its goal is not to control information, but to restore dialogue.