Recent articles have been focusing on opportunity education, helping people understand that war is unrelated to prices; it is how traders, as usual, can create any news they want and place orders to change prices, binding events to prices.
Let's continue with some examples:
Is war related to PI (BTC)? Is BTC not digital gold? Doesn't gold always rise during wars? Where does it rise?
Taking PI as an example, it can be seen that in reality, war is unrelated to prices; it is traders who see suitable news that affects investors, and thus they directly borrow a large amount of PI, borrowing nearly three million PI to replace everyone else's sell-off.
This way, the market believes that everyone is bearish and selling off, but in reality, only one person is selling, and this person has not bought any spot.
From the lending data, it can be seen that the borrowing volume surged, and then the price dropped.
Is there a button on Trump's missile control that shows borrowed PI? Is there a two-knob system on Trump's missile control, one for intervening in all project coins across the network, and the other for selling off the entire network after borrowing?
Who can take a picture to show me that Trump's missile control looks like this?
Whales in the market always use news tools to guide emotions, yet many analysts believe that the sell-off button is on the missile.