Coinbase Supports Trump Parade—Has Crypto Lost Its Rebel Spirit?
Coinbase’s sponsorship of a military parade in Washington, D.C., on 14 June has reignited questions about whether the crypto industry is drifting from its anti-establishment origins.
The event, held in honor of the US Army’s 250th anniversary, coincided with President Donald Trump’s 79th birthday and unfolded against the backdrop of nationwide “No Kings” protests—demonstrations condemning Trump’s immigration policies and perceived authoritarianism.
Despite its ceremonial purpose, the parade drew sparse, subdued crowds and faced criticism for its political overtones.
Among the 22 corporate sponsors were major tech players like Amazon and Palantir—the latter known for building AI-driven surveillance systems used across federal agencies.
Coinbase, the largest US-based crypto exchange and the third-largest globally, stood out not only for its financial support but also for a previous $1 million donation to Trump’s inauguration.
The company even received public acknowledgment during the event’s closing remarks.
For many in the crypto community, the optics of Coinbase aligning itself with a politically charged, government-sanctioned spectacle have raised a deeper concern: Is crypto abandoning its founding vision of decentralisation and resistance to centralised power in favour of institutional validation?
Is the Crypto Movement Selling Out to the Mainstream?
When Satoshi Nakamoto mined the first Bitcoin in January 2009, he embedded a message in the Genesis block referencing a Times headline about the UK’s plan to bail out banks following the 2008 financial crisis.
It was not just a timestamp—it was a statement.
Bitcoin’s creation was a response to a system that had, time and again, shifted the burden of corporate failure onto ordinary citizens.
Nakamoto’s innovation offered a radical alternative: a decentralised, peer-to-peer financial network free from government and central bank control.
This foundational ethos attracted early adopters who were largely technologists, libertarians, and privacy advocates—individuals sceptical of surveillance and state power.
Bros I don’t think crypto is a counter culture movement anymore https://t.co/QhD5kijbZh
— fejau (@fejau_inc) June 15, 2025
Crypto was seen not just as a new form of money, but as a countercultural movement aimed at disrupting the entrenched financial order.
That is why Coinbase’s recent sponsorship of a military parade celebrating the US Army—a core institution of centralied authority—has stirred controversy. For many, it marks a stark departure from crypto’s roots.
Was that seriously a coinbase sponsored military parade 🤣
— JB (@jamie247) June 15, 2025
Crypto Community’s Reaction Has Been No Less Scathing
Many users echo the sentiment that the industry had abandoned its original ethos—or perhaps never embodied it at all.
One user on X (formerly known as Twitter) remarked that crypto ceased to be a countercultural force “three years ago.”
It hasn't been for at least 3 years. Majority of crypto has been retards gambling since then, it feels like AI slop churners and draft kings had a baby. There will always be parts of crypto that are counter culture though and others that aren't
— Kiryu (@Kiryu_0x) June 15, 2025
Others questioned the necessity of corporate sponsorship for the parade, which was projected to cost around $45 million in public funds.
In a pointed jab, one commenter asked whether Coinbase would also be sponsoring repairs for D.C.’s “tank-mangled streets.”
Will Coinbase sponsor repairs to DC's tank mangled streets as well ?
— (Lizzie)🏳️🌈🇺🇦🏳️🌈 (@pip-kin.bsky.social) June 15, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Still, not everyone was surprised by Coinbase’s involvement.
It makes sense, like 30 percent of the crypto community went from libertarian types to some boot licking version of MAGA. Was sad to see.
— generic (@Scott_OBthatsme) June 15, 2025
For some, it was a predictable reflection of crypto’s steady march toward mainstream assimilation.
Others pushed back against the prior framing altogether.
One user argued that in any bottom-up, permissionless system, divergence is inevitable—as participants shape the ecosystem in unpredictable ways.
Among holders and investors, reactions were more tempered.
A bottoms up, permisionless system will usually evolve in ways that participants may not approve of
Better this than specific groups dictating what should and shouldn’t be
We can’t eat our cake and have it too!
— Publius (@publius_val) June 15, 2025
Many interpreted Coinbase’s sponsorship as a strategic decision to align with institutional power and optimise for long-term gains—reserving judgment rather than condemning the move outright.
