🔎 CryptoRoundTableRemarks: Legitimate debate or new control narrative?
Everyone’s posting about the SEC’s "open dialogue" at the Crypto Round Table 2025.
But… few dare to point out the real issue:
While regulators debate whether DeFi devs should be treated as open-source builders or as financial intermediaries, the core battle runs much deeper:
🚨 Code vs Intermediation
Code is transparent, auditable, and neutral.
Centralized intermediation is opaque, subject to political and economic interests.
🚨 Who defines responsibility?
If DeFi devs are treated like banks, innovation will be killed.
If they are protected as open-source developers, decentralization survives.
🚨 The new financial censorship model:
No need to ban crypto if you can suffocate its builders with impossible regulations.
💡 The future of crypto finance isn’t just decided on exchanges; it’s decided in the backrooms of these debates. What’s at stake is global digital sovereignty.
👉 My position is clear:
Protect DeFi development as public infrastructure — not as preemptive criminalization.
You're already part of my community! Leave a like, follow me, and let's grow together with the best content. And if you want to show some extra support, I truly appreciate it! 🚀💎