If there are 200,000 billionaires in China/1.4 billion, then if you become one of the top 20 people among the 1.4 billion (regardless of the field), then it is highly likely that you will become a billionaire. Because billionaires exist in all age groups, and the total number is larger, but you already account for 200,000/1.4 billion. But how do you become one of the 200,000 among the 1.4 billion?


Now let’s calculate:


1. 1.4 billion people, 700 million men and 700 million women


Now you are 1/700 million, or 1 in 700 million.


2. 10 years of youth are available (e.g. 25-35), considering the average life expectancy of 70


So you are now 1/100 million


3. Competition among 100 million peers


When we have 100 million peers competing, the calculation method for men and women is completely different, because women have a bug option, that is, there is a beauty index in the random parameters when they are born. If the score of this item is high, the proportion will increase rapidly.


1. Women’s computing


Next, let’s calculate the number of women first. Taking @MyHongKongDoll as an example, it will be particularly easy to understand.


Among 100 million young women, assuming that appearance/figure is considered a talent point, and if you are one in a hundred with a talent point (this can be calculated by comparing it to being the most beautiful girl in class/department/campus when you are in school), here we assume that someone's appearance is 1/30, then, among the 100 million competitors, only 3 million people will compete with her in an instant - of course, it is not that simple, there are many assumptions here, because beauty is a special talent point, it has a magnifying effect, not a + method, or even a multiplication method.


Among 3 million beauties, if you want to reach the top 200,000 at this point, it is very simple. For example, if your eloquence is one in ten, then you will be one in 300,000, which is very close to the ratio mentioned at the beginning - of course, we have to consider a variable next.


Can you find a platform/opportunity to use your beauty? If not, the amplification effect does not exist.


Sister Doll made several enlargements:


First, I picked onlyfans global amplification;


Second, it was an erotic track, which magnified human nature;


Third, she actually found a bug in the platform and boosted the traffic in the early stages.




With these multiplications, how many of the 3 million beauties are in her top 10? She should be very, very high, definitely more than 200,000.


Of course, the above is just an example to show another perspective.


Some hosts of CCTV may become extremely famous after just one appearance on the screen. With their beauty, eloquence and platform, they are at the forefront. The only problem is that the efficiency of wealth conversion on the CCTV platform is basically 0. However, they have the opportunity to become billionaires, which is much greater than that of ordinary people.


Let me give you another example, Yang Lan, she is a beauty, but she may not be one in a hundred, and she is married. Later, she met a billionaire and founded a high-end interview program for him, gaining both fame and fortune, and her wealth is immeasurable. This is the multiplication of the addition.


But this kind of multiplication is inseparable from experience, knowledge and common sense.


Because of the bug value of beauty, women have very different choices from men, but apart from taking the idol route, the number of men who rely on their looks to debut has increased greatly. For example, I am very good-looking, but Aunt Wang no longer likes me. After giving me 300 yuan as a breakup fee, she said that she only likes handsome guys in their 20s.


What if women are not good-looking or have average looks? That's a good thing, because then they can enter the same race as men.


Next, we will move on to the male track and continue to estimate the male ratio at 700 million (female ratio is used as a reference).


2. Calculation of men


Among the 700 million men, there are now the following common scoring points. Some of their scores can be magnified by multiplication, and some are added as bonus items. The division may not be rigorous, but it is roughly for reference


--eloquence


It occupies an important position in all social activities such as business, daily life, love, live broadcast, etc. It is a top-level ability with an amplifying effect. Don’t you see how much help Chen Sheng and Wu Guang’s sentence "Are kings, princes, generals, and ministers of different races" has received?


In the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, it is said that "the argument of one person is more valuable than the nine tripods; the three-inch tongue is more powerful than a million soldiers."


Of course, a person's success is a combination of factors. Please don't worry about Zhao Kuo's armchair military strategy or the like, because any bonus talent point may become a negative point if combined with another one. This is all reasonable. It is just a convenience for everyone to use in mathematical calculations.


Here, if your eloquence is one in 100, then congratulations, you have gained talent points that are no less than beauty, and you have directly become one of the 7 million.


The points of eloquence are related to the development of language ability in childhood and the amount of reading during the growth process. If there is only development without reading, the words will be meaningless; if there is only reading without development, the person may be good at thinking but cannot keep up with the expression.


——Inner talent


People's success depends on the talents they are born with and the help they receive during their growth, but ultimately one of the key factors is their learning ability and learning experience.


I think this has little to do with academic qualifications. Academic qualifications have no multiplication effect, only addition, which is insignificant. This article discusses competitive advantage, and I think it actually has some guidance for the future. The essence of competitive advantage is that I have what others do not have, and I am better than others. But what about academic qualifications? You are an undergraduate, so am I; you are a graduate student, so am I; you are from Harvard, and I am from Oxford.


Instead of spending more than 20 years to obtain an academic degree, it is better to return to the cultivation of "learning ability" and the focus on "learning experience" - of course, whether academic qualifications are important depends on what kind of family you are in. Some people study and work in order to solve the problem of survival first, and there is nothing wrong with that.


If you focus on cultivating your learning ability and paying attention to your learning experience, your academic qualifications will not be bad.


Inner talent can be acquired, and it can also be self-assessed. You can evaluate what proportion of your inner talent is among the crowd - note that this is not a comprehensive comparison, such as astronomy and geography, but a special comparison, whether you are an expert in your field.


For example, in the field of live streaming, Jia Nailiang has now become the top star. He has a good eloquence and good inner talent - this mainly depends on his acquired learning ability. He mentioned that "he memorizes words very quickly and can memorize a lot quickly before going on stage." He also mentioned that he is very hardworking and made a lot of preparations before each live broadcast a few years ago.


Li Ka-shing recalled that when he was 16, he said that he was "modest on the outside, but proud on the inside, because he felt that he was different", which was also due to the horizontal comparison of his inner talents. At that time, his father had passed away a few years ago. When his father was dying, he held his father's hand and said: I will definitely take good care of my mother. He then rejected the idea of ​​his relatives to continue to support him in school, and chose to work by himself, starting as an apprentice. At that time, he read a lot of books after work every day, and every day was different.


Having talked about eloquence and inner talent, let’s briefly talk about a calculation method. For example, if a person has good eloquence, he is one in a hundred; and if he also has strong inner talent, he is also one in a hundred. At this point, he can be considered one in ten thousand, and he has already entered the top 200,000 people. All he needs is opportunity and platform.


The learning ability in inner talent is an implicit plus point. Some people need 10 minutes to memorize a five-character quatrain, while others can memorize ten lines at a glance. This will be reflected in future growth, and we can only pray for Buddha's blessing in this regard.


--character


How useful is writing ability? Sun Ge gained confidence and extra points by writing essays - he had good grades in Peking University and was admitted without extra points.


Some became writers, some became bloggers, some became big secretaries within the system, and some became ghostwriters, and the list goes on.


Writing ability is similar to eloquence to a certain extent, but most of the time, due to differences among humans, groups, and human brains, writing is not as attractive as eloquence, so the score is not that important, but it is still multiplication. Assuming that the magnification factor of eloquence is 10 times, then writing may only be 3 times - after all, most people cannot finish reading a long article (for example, if you have read this article to this point, congratulations, you are already in the top 30% in terms of reading ability, so you can take it into account when calculating it yourself).


--character


Character determines destiny, but there are so many things involved that I will discuss them all together.


For example, the results for a diligent and hardworking person and a person who is used to being cunning and dishonest will be different. All you have to do is evaluate which side you are on and how diligent you are, and then you can roughly calculate your proportion in the crowd.


For example, people who retreat when faced with difficulties and those who become more tenacious when faced with difficulties have two different fates.


For example, people who are used to being critical, blaming and pressuring others and people who are used to being tolerant and encouraging will score differently on different platforms.


In the same live streaming business, those who have good talent, good eloquence, good character and good personality will become more and more successful over time, while those who may have shortcomings may suffer big setbacks.


--conduct


The personality mentioned above can be considered to be more influenced by innate factors, while character mainly depends on acquired education and personal cultivation (there is also a difference in subjective will, some people want to become better, and some people just want to live a happy life)


In terms of character, people with good character are more likely to succeed than those with bad character.


For example, people who are trustworthy and insist on being trustworthy will eventually gain more and more business partners.


For example, if you make concessions, cooperate with others, strive to fulfill your duty, only earn what you should earn, or even make appropriate concessions, it will be easier to have long-term blessings.


For example, being kind, understanding that everyone has flaws and makes mistakes, not pushing people into a corner, being kind at heart, etc.


For those who pursue goodness, character is not an external pursuit with a purpose, but an internal pursuit for one's own comfort.


--Body


People who can “fall asleep as soon as they lie down” and people who “often cannot fall asleep no matter how hard they try” have very different scores in the talent point of sleeping, and they will affect their energy, and energy will affect all the achievements made.


There will be a huge difference in the achievements that can be achieved between high-energy people who are energetic and recover quickly and low-energy people who feel tired even when saying a word.


This is also multiplication. But the good thing is that this can be optimized and adjusted by yourself through exercise, meditation, etc., but the difference in talent still exists and is huge.


Genetic factors also have a great influence on physical condition, so it can be taken into consideration when looking for a partner, and may be more important than academic qualifications.


To make a summary:


If a man wants to succeed, he needs very comprehensive abilities. Just one of them is not enough. Even if he has several, he also needs opportunities, platforms, and space. For example, if someone is born in a humble family and struggles to survive, then the difficulty is extremely high.


In addition, another point is to meet a noble person. No matter how bad a person is, as long as he has bright spots or even multiple bright spots in the above points, he will meet a noble person sooner or later - because you are already a minority in the crowd, blessings will naturally find you.


So, if you want to know whether you can become a billionaire, after reading this article, you should be able to easily calculate your proportion in the crowd. If you think it is not enough, find a way to improve it. As long as it is improved, then:


You will definitely get your own blessings!