Binance Square

残月悲梦

52 Following
184 Followers
670 Liked
33 Shared
All Content
--
See original
This new regulation is of no use at all; it's just giving a little hope to those with low scores or perhaps a bit of a refund on fees. Many people have already been pushed down in scores, and some fools are still dreaming that the scores will drop. Only those without brains would think like that. The first stage of scores will still start at 245-250, with rewards around 50U. The second stage will be between 220-240 or 230-240, with rewards at most 20-30U. Scores cannot possibly drop; it’s just a little fee refund for those on the edge of passing. The scores will still remain the same with no changes; those who aren’t claiming will still not claim.
This new regulation is of no use at all; it's just giving a little hope to those with low scores or perhaps a bit of a refund on fees. Many people have already been pushed down in scores, and some fools are still dreaming that the scores will drop. Only those without brains would think like that. The first stage of scores will still start at 245-250, with rewards around 50U. The second stage will be between 220-240 or 230-240, with rewards at most 20-30U. Scores cannot possibly drop; it’s just a little fee refund for those on the edge of passing. The scores will still remain the same with no changes; those who aren’t claiming will still not claim.
See original
Has ALPHA reached the end of the road? All kinds of garbage have come up, there are no new coins, only some old junk coins, and they still demand high. Yesterday it was 246, today it's 245. Let's just start at 250.
Has ALPHA reached the end of the road? All kinds of garbage have come up, there are no new coins, only some old junk coins, and they still demand high. Yesterday it was 246, today it's 245. Let's just start at 250.
See original
Is this way of adding points going to discourage all retail investors? Is it going to start at 250 next time? Airdrops are worth money, 247 doesn't have much to say. The current airdrop is rewarding trash points, and you all can play your games. I'm finishing the last wave, recovering my losses, and retiring.
Is this way of adding points going to discourage all retail investors? Is it going to start at 250 next time? Airdrops are worth money, 247 doesn't have much to say. The current airdrop is rewarding trash points, and you all can play your games. I'm finishing the last wave, recovering my losses, and retiring.
See original
$ROAM 247 Truly going to say goodbye to you
$ROAM 247 Truly going to say goodbye to you
See original
TGE's new offering of 240 means that the subsequent airdrops will also start at 240. Let's keep rolling; if one gets rolled over, that's one less. I'm very happy to see you all lose money.
TGE's new offering of 240 means that the subsequent airdrops will also start at 240. Let's keep rolling; if one gets rolled over, that's one less. I'm very happy to see you all lose money.
See original
How many people have retired from this wave of ALPHA airdrop after 239 points? Are small investors no longer worthy of playing? Large investors are also coming to grab the low benefits, and every time the airdrop, almost half remains unclaimed, meaning that actually only half of the slots are unclaimed, and those people continue to occupy the next slots. This is also why the points are getting higher and more competitive. Additionally, the airdrop rewards are getting lower and the frequency is decreasing. Last month, the airdrop started at least 100U, and now it generally ranges from 60-80U. If you can't keep up with a round, you'll be at a disadvantage. If ALPHA doesn't change the rules, it is destined to discourage most small investors, leaving only large investors and studios to play.
How many people have retired from this wave of ALPHA airdrop after 239 points? Are small investors no longer worthy of playing? Large investors are also coming to grab the low benefits, and every time the airdrop, almost half remains unclaimed, meaning that actually only half of the slots are unclaimed, and those people continue to occupy the next slots. This is also why the points are getting higher and more competitive. Additionally, the airdrop rewards are getting lower and the frequency is decreasing. Last month, the airdrop started at least 100U, and now it generally ranges from 60-80U. If you can't keep up with a round, you'll be at a disadvantage. If ALPHA doesn't change the rules, it is destined to discourage most small investors, leaving only large investors and studios to play.
See original
Just two days later, they both blocked me and cheated me out of over 100 yuan in handling fees. Complaining is useless. I’m speechless. The studio can’t be destroyed, specifically targeting us common folks. Speechless, damn it, opening the door to speechlessness, speechless until I get home.
Just two days later, they both blocked me and cheated me out of over 100 yuan in handling fees. Complaining is useless. I’m speechless. The studio can’t be destroyed, specifically targeting us common folks. Speechless, damn it, opening the door to speechlessness, speechless until I get home.
See original
Today the airdrop reached 233 points. There are too many people occupying the bathroom without doing their business, and those who want to go can't find a spot. What can you do about it? Others are just not claiming their points and acting as gatekeepers for points. Yesterday, 225 points were met, but only half of the nearly 50,000 people claimed the airdrop. Today, with 233 points, there should still be about half of the 30,000 people from yesterday. Based on the current airdrop of over 80 USDT, those people will continue to occupy the bathroom without doing their business and act as gatekeepers for points. As long as these gatekeepers are around, the points will only keep rising. 233 points is not the limit for these individuals. Right now, high scores essentially mean that claiming once is basically useless, so to maximize benefits, everyone is waiting for airdrops of 150-200 or even higher. The points are not being consumed, and with a large number of people meeting the criteria, the points just keep getting higher. Only by getting rid of these people occupying the bathroom without doing their business can everyone have a spot. Otherwise, they will keep occupying it without doing anything. What can you do when those who want to go can't find a spot and those who don't want to go take up the space?
Today the airdrop reached 233 points. There are too many people occupying the bathroom without doing their business, and those who want to go can't find a spot. What can you do about it? Others are just not claiming their points and acting as gatekeepers for points. Yesterday, 225 points were met, but only half of the nearly 50,000 people claimed the airdrop. Today, with 233 points, there should still be about half of the 30,000 people from yesterday. Based on the current airdrop of over 80 USDT, those people will continue to occupy the bathroom without doing their business and act as gatekeepers for points. As long as these gatekeepers are around, the points will only keep rising. 233 points is not the limit for these individuals. Right now, high scores essentially mean that claiming once is basically useless, so to maximize benefits, everyone is waiting for airdrops of 150-200 or even higher. The points are not being consumed, and with a large number of people meeting the criteria, the points just keep getting higher. Only by getting rid of these people occupying the bathroom without doing their business can everyone have a spot. Otherwise, they will keep occupying it without doing anything. What can you do when those who want to go can't find a spot and those who don't want to go take up the space?
See original
233 points and there's no more fun, yesterday there were about 50,000 people who met the standard with 225 points, and half of them didn't claim the airdrop, not consuming points. Today, more than 30,000 people may have a significant portion of those who didn't claim the airdrop yesterday. These people are not consuming points, acting as point gatekeepers, so scores will only continue to rise and will not decrease. Tomorrow or the day after, it might start at 240 points. To put it simply, these people are saving their points and waiting for high-reward airdrops. Given the current situation, if you claim one less airdrop, it's wasted. Therefore, to maximize benefits, everyone is waiting for high-reward airdrops; the more we wait without consuming points, the higher the scores will climb.
233 points and there's no more fun, yesterday there were about 50,000 people who met the standard with 225 points, and half of them didn't claim the airdrop, not consuming points. Today, more than 30,000 people may have a significant portion of those who didn't claim the airdrop yesterday. These people are not consuming points, acting as point gatekeepers, so scores will only continue to rise and will not decrease. Tomorrow or the day after, it might start at 240 points. To put it simply, these people are saving their points and waiting for high-reward airdrops. Given the current situation, if you claim one less airdrop, it's wasted. Therefore, to maximize benefits, everyone is waiting for high-reward airdrops; the more we wait without consuming points, the higher the scores will climb.
See original
Setting new records again, if this continues, it will start at 240. If the studio doesn't drive us to death, we won't have the chance to play. Other studios act as score gatekeepers, waiting for high reward airdrops, while the low ones are not claimed and do not consume points. Points will only keep escalating, while others' scores just won't be consumed. What can you do?
Setting new records again, if this continues, it will start at 240. If the studio doesn't drive us to death, we won't have the chance to play. Other studios act as score gatekeepers, waiting for high reward airdrops, while the low ones are not claimed and do not consume points. Points will only keep escalating, while others' scores just won't be consumed. What can you do?
See original
ALPHA airdrop 225 points, this may just be the beginning. Next, it might roll up to 240-250 points. Is there a possibility that studios batch-create accounts to act as point gatekeepers? A point gatekeeper selectively accepts airdrops, rejecting low-quality airdrops and specifically waiting for high-reward airdrops. Their points do not deplete, yet they occupy a slot. For example, if there are only 240 points, they specifically wait for high-reward airdrops and ignore the low-quality ones. Unlike regular players who don’t discriminate and just accept almost all airdrops, the more gatekeepers there are, the higher the point threshold naturally becomes, which means we can receive fewer airdrops. Now, compared to the previous round, we have at least 2-3 fewer airdrops.
ALPHA airdrop 225 points, this may just be the beginning. Next, it might roll up to 240-250 points. Is there a possibility that studios batch-create accounts to act as point gatekeepers? A point gatekeeper selectively accepts airdrops, rejecting low-quality airdrops and specifically waiting for high-reward airdrops. Their points do not deplete, yet they occupy a slot. For example, if there are only 240 points, they specifically wait for high-reward airdrops and ignore the low-quality ones. Unlike regular players who don’t discriminate and just accept almost all airdrops, the more gatekeepers there are, the higher the point threshold naturally becomes, which means we can receive fewer airdrops. Now, compared to the previous round, we have at least 2-3 fewer airdrops.
See original
The threshold has reached 225 points. Airdrops are not afraid of you claiming them; the concern is those studios that only wait for high-reward airdrops, with 100U bulk numbers ready to claim. They can claim airdrops less frequently, so they only wait for high-reward airdrops. We regular players tend to claim airdrops whenever available, while they, in contrast, selectively claim airdrops. As score gatekeepers, what can you do against them? With more score gatekeepers, don’t dream of getting points down; points will only keep increasing.
The threshold has reached 225 points. Airdrops are not afraid of you claiming them; the concern is those studios that only wait for high-reward airdrops, with 100U bulk numbers ready to claim. They can claim airdrops less frequently, so they only wait for high-reward airdrops. We regular players tend to claim airdrops whenever available, while they, in contrast, selectively claim airdrops. As score gatekeepers, what can you do against them? With more score gatekeepers, don’t dream of getting points down; points will only keep increasing.
See original
ALPHA empty airdrops are becoming increasingly competitive. Studios are not dying with bulk accounts, and it's impossible to lower the scores without taking out a batch. For those bulk accounts of 100U, just getting one airdrop is already profitable. The key is that others can choose to wait for higher airdrops. If the airdrop is garbage, they won't claim it, occupying slots and the score threshold. What can you do? So even if Binance releases airdrops every day, the scores continue to rise and become more competitive. This is because others with 100U accounts never intended to get multiple airdrops; they only need to get 1-2 high-reward airdrops to make a profit. Unlike us regular players who claim airdrops almost whenever, studios do the opposite. They don't claim the low airdrops and wait for the higher ones. The rising scores mean nothing to them, as others never intended to take multiple airdrops because their scores and funds don't allow for multiple airdrops.
ALPHA empty airdrops are becoming increasingly competitive. Studios are not dying with bulk accounts, and it's impossible to lower the scores without taking out a batch. For those bulk accounts of 100U, just getting one airdrop is already profitable. The key is that others can choose to wait for higher airdrops. If the airdrop is garbage, they won't claim it, occupying slots and the score threshold. What can you do? So even if Binance releases airdrops every day, the scores continue to rise and become more competitive. This is because others with 100U accounts never intended to get multiple airdrops; they only need to get 1-2 high-reward airdrops to make a profit. Unlike us regular players who claim airdrops almost whenever, studios do the opposite. They don't claim the low airdrops and wait for the higher ones. The rising scores mean nothing to them, as others never intended to take multiple airdrops because their scores and funds don't allow for multiple airdrops.
See original
ALPHA's opinion has been raised for everyone to propose together. We must defeat the studio so that we can enjoy some rewards; otherwise, with the starting score at 250, no one will benefit as the studio will consume everything in bulk.
ALPHA's opinion has been raised for everyone to propose together. We must defeat the studio so that we can enjoy some rewards; otherwise, with the starting score at 250, no one will benefit as the studio will consume everything in bulk.
See original
Do you really know the reason why ALPHA scores are getting higher? The real reason is that small studios are using over 100 U to batch create accounts with less capital and technology for trading. Just think about it, starting trading with 1000 U is already very competitive, so how can 100 U continue to persist? With several tens of thousands in trading volume, it's normal to trade hundreds of times for several hours without making a profit. Why do they still persist? To put it simply, this is basically how studios operate: each account earns little, but after creating hundreds in batches, they end up making a lot. Therefore, Binance should now eliminate accounts starting with 100 U to raise the ALPHA threshold. If you want to play, you need at least 1000 U to start. Let's see if studios can still batch create accounts like this. This would at least cut down on the smaller accounts by ten times, and naturally, the distribution will decrease.
Do you really know the reason why ALPHA scores are getting higher? The real reason is that small studios are using over 100 U to batch create accounts with less capital and technology for trading. Just think about it, starting trading with 1000 U is already very competitive, so how can 100 U continue to persist? With several tens of thousands in trading volume, it's normal to trade hundreds of times for several hours without making a profit. Why do they still persist? To put it simply, this is basically how studios operate: each account earns little, but after creating hundreds in batches, they end up making a lot. Therefore, Binance should now eliminate accounts starting with 100 U to raise the ALPHA threshold. If you want to play, you need at least 1000 U to start. Let's see if studios can still batch create accounts like this. This would at least cut down on the smaller accounts by ten times, and naturally, the distribution will decrease.
See original
All the good things of ALPHA are caused by bugs and those studios. We, the players, are blamed. Previously, the studio built a pool and created a coin with a balance of hundreds of millions, and directly used up the holding points. Then they closed the bug. Now they have built a pool with a transaction volume of millions, and directly used up the transaction volume points. Others can do it in one day, which is two days for us. It's a pity that we didn't do anything and just traded manually. We are still subject to risk control. Closing the studio is not capable of doing anything to us, but normal players have plenty of abilities.
All the good things of ALPHA are caused by bugs and those studios. We, the players, are blamed. Previously, the studio built a pool and created a coin with a balance of hundreds of millions, and directly used up the holding points. Then they closed the bug. Now they have built a pool with a transaction volume of millions, and directly used up the transaction volume points. Others can do it in one day, which is two days for us. It's a pity that we didn't do anything and just traded manually. We are still subject to risk control. Closing the studio is not capable of doing anything to us, but normal players have plenty of abilities.
See original
#币安Alpha上新 ALPHA manual trading did not use third-party software and was still subject to risk control; killing people also requires punishing the heart. Here risk control was enforced, and there was still continuous trading, otherwise, points would be wasted. How many people, like me, are innocent victims? Adding up, there are only three accounts, all registered under family members' real names, all manual trading with one device and one account. Since CZ wants risk control, they shouldn't have said that a family can trade together in the first place. I don't know if the studio has risk control, but all my accounts are under risk control. Airdrops didn't make money, and I still have to lose money every day to maintain trading volume and keep my points.
#币安Alpha上新 ALPHA manual trading did not use third-party software and was still subject to risk control; killing people also requires punishing the heart. Here risk control was enforced, and there was still continuous trading, otherwise, points would be wasted. How many people, like me, are innocent victims? Adding up, there are only three accounts, all registered under family members' real names, all manual trading with one device and one account. Since CZ wants risk control, they shouldn't have said that a family can trade together in the first place. I don't know if the studio has risk control, but all my accounts are under risk control. Airdrops didn't make money, and I still have to lose money every day to maintain trading volume and keep my points.
See original
ALPHA risk control can hit anyone manually trading in the wallet every day. The customer service's meaning is very clear: there is simply no way to do anything but appeal. To put it bluntly, it doesn't matter whether you used third-party software or not; first, risk control is enforced, and then you will naturally appeal. This is like locking you up first regardless of whether you are guilty, and then asking you to prove your innocence. I don't know if the studio has done anything to me, but I see a lot of innocent people getting hit in the square. Since it has to be like this, everyone should be under risk control, and everyone should prove their innocence. I heard that appeals also have a high probability of failing. I don't have my ID on me, and I'll have to wait a few days to go home before I can appeal.
ALPHA risk control can hit anyone manually trading in the wallet every day. The customer service's meaning is very clear: there is simply no way to do anything but appeal. To put it bluntly, it doesn't matter whether you used third-party software or not; first, risk control is enforced, and then you will naturally appeal. This is like locking you up first regardless of whether you are guilty, and then asking you to prove your innocence. I don't know if the studio has done anything to me, but I see a lot of innocent people getting hit in the square. Since it has to be like this, everyone should be under risk control, and everyone should prove their innocence. I heard that appeals also have a high probability of failing. I don't have my ID on me, and I'll have to wait a few days to go home before I can appeal.
See original
The ALPHA risk control studio has gone crazy, I don't know if it has killed me, but it has definitely messed me up. The studios that use scripts and technology to boost trading volume are all multi-account operations; a single account's manual trading takes at most ten minutes, and there's no need for scripts to inflate trading volume. Is there anyone else like me who got hit without doing anything wrong, just randomly caught in the risk control?
The ALPHA risk control studio has gone crazy, I don't know if it has killed me, but it has definitely messed me up. The studios that use scripts and technology to boost trading volume are all multi-account operations; a single account's manual trading takes at most ten minutes, and there's no need for scripts to inflate trading volume. Is there anyone else like me who got hit without doing anything wrong, just randomly caught in the risk control?
See original
The recent airdrops have become increasingly outrageous and ridiculous. Today, with a score of 223, this garbage airdrop reward is getting worse and worse. It seems that in the future, there won't even be 100U, at most it will just be 40-80U.
The recent airdrops have become increasingly outrageous and ridiculous. Today, with a score of 223, this garbage airdrop reward is getting worse and worse. It seems that in the future, there won't even be 100U, at most it will just be 40-80U.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Saad72342
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs