U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has accused Elon Musk of systematically abusing his government role to enrich himself and benefit his companies. A new report from her office claims that the Tesla and SpaceX CEO acted in his own interest in at least 130 instances while serving in the federal Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during the Trump administration.

🔹 The report, published on June 3, closely examines Musk’s involvement as a "special government employee" and accuses him and his associates of engaging in conduct that raises serious concerns about ethics, conflicts of interest, and even possible corruption.

🔹 While Musk served as head of DOGE, his companies – including SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, xAI, X (formerly Twitter) and others – allegedly benefited from large federal contracts, while investigations into these firms were suspended or dropped.

https://x.com/stillgray/status/1929826020959658029

Billion-Dollar Contracts and Suspended Investigations

The report highlights that SpaceX secured over $7 billion in contracts from the Department of Defense. Meanwhile, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) was reportedly exploring the use of Starlink surveillance towers for border monitoring, and the FAA considered cancelling a $2.4 billion contract with Verizon in favor of awarding it to SpaceX.

Regulatory agencies reportedly remained inactive – more than 40 investigations by federal authorities stalled indefinitely. The U.S. Air Force refused to even assess the eligibility of SpaceX for suspension or exclusion, despite concerns over Musk’s repeated interactions with high-level Russian officials, including Vladimir Putin.

Access to Classified Information and Policy Influence

Beyond securing contracts, Musk allegedly gained access to confidential meetings and sensitive government data that may have benefited his companies. He is also accused of steering foreign aid and immigration policy to align with his personal interests, rather than serving the public good.

Senator Jeanne Shaheen stressed that Musk and his DOGE staff had unprecedented access to some of the most sensitive U.S. government data. She urged President Trump to require these individuals to pledge not to use any non-public government information for personal gain after leaving public service.

Overreliance on Federal Funding?

Economist Jeffrey Sonnenfeld from Yale University pointed out that, unlike other tech giants like Nvidia, Amazon, or Microsoft, Musk’s business empire appears heavily reliant on federal funding.

A former Tesla executive, speaking anonymously out of fear of retaliation, revealed that the company would likely not have survived without a critical $465 million loan from the Department of Energy in 2010. NASA has also invested over $15 billion in collaboration with SpaceX.

Ethics or Ends Justify the Means?

While Warren is calling for a thorough investigation and stricter oversight of conflicts of interest, the Trump-led White House defended Musk. Spokesman Harrison Fields stated that all contracts involving Musk’s companies comply with federal ethics rules and that there is no conflict of interest.

Yet, lawmakers remain unconvinced. The report concludes that Musk is using his influence to interfere with political and judicial processes, ultimately protecting his private and business interests at the expense of the public.

Summary:

Musk is under fire for allegedly abusing his government role during the Trump administration. He secured federal contracts, accessed classified data, and is accused of bending the rules in his favor. The question remains: Is he a visionary who skillfully played the system, or a businessman who crossed the line?



#ElizabethWarren , #ElonMusk , #DOGE , #USPolitics , #CryptoNewss

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!

Notice:

,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“