Friends often ask me how this project on the Virtual platform is, or whether that project can be participated in.

Actually, there is a very simple way. You don't need to specifically look at how the project is doing; just look at the number of participants, how many points the leading contributors have, and the extent of oversubscription. You don't even need to research too deeply.

For example, today with ERM, there are still four hours left, and it has already exceeded 400%. The top contributors have over two million points, and big point holders are jumping in. So just follow along and participate a bit; it's that simple. Don't they research it as much as we do?

On the contrary, if it’s a rather poor project, even if it barely exceeds 300%, having the leading contributors with seventy or eighty thousand points is considered the best case. When it opens, it might just be a few hundred k and then it’s done. I suspect most people might just be participating to boost their activity, which makes it unnecessary to get involved.

I believe that at this stage, the distinction between good and bad projects on the Virtual platform is already very clear. A lot of information is public. When a project comes out, a bunch of people will research it, and each research report is professional and thorough. If you search for the project name, you can find ten long articles analyzing it.

Moreover, the one-day presale time on the Virtual platform does indeed give users enough time to react and make decisions. Good projects will definitely not be missed.

Just follow along; there’s no need to be so stressed every day.