Home
Notification
Profile
Trending Articles
News
Bookmarked and Liked
History
Creator Center
Settings
LoganJastremski
--
Follow
Increasing determinism in trading is good, and we should explore the trade offs to enhance onchain execution
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.
See T&Cs.
19
0
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sign Up
Login
Relevant Creator
LoganJastremski
@LoganJastremski
Follow
Explore More From Creator
The Blockchain industry is going to be competing with High-Frequency trading if we are able aiming to achieve anything meaningful You'll need 10GB/s of throughput+ to remotely be competitive at scale
--
Still crazy to me that in 2025 the Top L2s are doing less than 1MB/s of throughput
--
My observation from Hyperliquid is that they care less about playing crypto-native games As an example: - Transactions land FCFS - Validator set is co-located - Priority fees don't exist for trading - All flow is treated as toxic with prioritized cancels On the surface, these seem strange to the crypto community, but by focusing purely on their own merits, they're very sensible from a product point of view I'm increasingly bearish on crypto-native games of KOLs, "community marketing," and in favor of building shit we want to use
--
Reducing toxic flow is important, but eliminating priority fees for trading is a higher priority Toxic flow is a trackable issue, whereas priority fees require a system redesign
--
An honest conversation we’ve been thinking about is whether REV is the correct metric for valuing L1s. In the past, I would have unequivocally said yes, but now I’m not so sure Block auctions, and by extension priority fees and tips, increase randomness in access to valuable state, reducing market makers’ ability to quote tighter spreads If block auctions widen spreads by design and push us further from replacing NASDAQ, what is the point of optimizing for this metric if the result is a worse product? I dont have the answers here but food for thought
--
Latest News
BNB Drops Below 640 USDT with a 0.36% Decrease in 24 Hours
--
Circle's NYSE Debut Highlights Stablecoins' Growing Role in Finance
--
Telegram Founder Pavel Durov Plans Wealth Distribution Among Children
--
Cryptocurrency Market Experiences $125 Million Liquidation in 24 Hours
--
Bitcoin's Rising OBV Signals Potential Price Surge by Q3 2025
--
View More
Trending Articles
🚨🚨 BREAKING: Russia sends STARK WARNING to the United States 🚨🚨
Crypto Nate
🚨 TOMORROW COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING FOR CRYPTO 🚨 The markets are on edge… and the Fed is about to
Trader Safeer
✉️ Telegram Founder #PavelDurov Gives First Interview in F
WISE PUMPS
🚨Pi Big news coming — can’t help but give you an early tea
Professor Of BTC_CRYPTO Information
🔔 🔥 XRP Burn Alert: 14 Million XRP Destroyed! 🔔 🚀 XRP’s
MR CRYPTO LOVER
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs
