RWA, to put it simply, is just a new scheme dressed in the guise of 'real assets'. No matter how grand the talk is, the essence is still the old formula—pulling in people, creating consensus, and following the Ponzi routine.

But don’t underestimate it; this kind of scheme is the easiest to have big gains. Why? Because retail investors simply don’t understand it, thinking it’s safe, when in fact all the risks are on-chain; while the smart ones have already jumped in early.

If you ask Lao Teng what he thinks about RWA?

Go for it, but understand what it is. Don’t be like during the Meme craze, where everyone initially called it a scam, and later everyone scrambled to get on board.

Let me summarize for you: RWA can be popular because of several characteristics. If you identify these well, you’ll grasp the underlying logic for making a move:

1. No compliance qualifications; if the project party has all kinds of certifications, then it’s not Web3;

2. Strong community, strong ground promotion, standardized scripts—you need to be able to rally, set the pace, and control emotions;

3. The targets must be compelling and elastic, whether they are real assets or fake pegged assets, they must be able to tell a story and have explosive potential.

Do you understand? Isn’t this just the 'middle-aged version of Meme'? The gameplay has changed its shell, but the rhythm is still familiar.

In the future, when you see titles like 'RWA + Real Estate', 'RWA + Bonds', 'RWA + Gold', don’t ask if it’s a scam; it definitely is. But can you get in before it explodes and get out before it crashes? That’s the key.

Don’t be the last one holding the bag; we want to be among the first to hold it.