Paradigm Researcher Stresses Rule Compliance Over Decentralization in Sorting Systems

According to PANews, Dan Robinson, a researcher at Paradigm, recently took to the X platform to share his perspective on the ongoing debate around decentralization in sorting systems.

Robinson argued that the primary concern shouldn't be whether a sorter is decentralized, but rather the nature of the rules it follows. He emphasized that the real risk lies in sorters abusing their power—either to harm users or to extract value unethically.

Importantly, Robinson pointed out that decentralization alone does not guarantee fairness. He explained that decentralized sorters can still act extractively, just as centralized sorters can operate ethically and transparently. His comments highlight the critical role of rule compliance in ensuring user protection, regardless of system structure.

By shifting the focus from structure to behavior, Robinson’s insights offer a nuanced take on how trust and integrity should be measured in modern sorting systems.