While other coins are heading towards 'EOS-ification', A has completed its rebirth.
Once upon a time, EOS was hailed as the king of 'Blockchain 3.0', boasting the world's strongest technical team, the earliest resource model, and extreme performance optimization. However, behind the glory lies a deep tragedy: the project was choked by capital, the community was neglected, the foundation (Block.one) was just going through the motions, and the public chain became a tool of capital.
Ultimately, this massive innovation experiment was deemed a 'failed sample' by the market due to B1's long-term dereliction and harvesting. However, EOS did not end; instead, it completed a historic transformation — it was taken over by the community, replaced with a brand new A, and underwent a comprehensive restart from its soul to its mechanism, achieving a true rebirth.
A: An evolved product breaking away from the EOS legacy.
A is not 'another new coin'; it is the heir to EOS's strongest past assets — including technical architecture, developer networks, and community consensus — and at the same time, it is a complete denial of the past issues of capital control. Without B1, without a fund that harvests retail investors, A is a new paradigm 'born from the community, existing for consensus'.
A has changed the previous governance structure of 'false financing driven, upper-level profit control', returning power, resources, and incentives to on-chain users. It no longer relies on luxurious offices or elite storytelling but returns to the value expression and task-driven model of the chain itself.
Other projects are gradually 'EOS-ifying'.
Ironically, as EOS breaks free from B1-ification and breathes freely again, many other well-known projects are falling into similar deep pits.
Some L1 projects' 'technological innovations' have stagnated, relying on 'airdrops', 'renaming', and 'fund management' to maintain their popularity.
Several star foundations are gradually losing their ability to interact with the community, turning into propaganda machines of 'news releases + KOL controlled reviews'.
Development resources are concentrated in the hands of a few core individuals, while ordinary users on the chain have become tools for traffic and decorations for market value.
This is the typical 'B1-ification': hollowing out, bureaucratization, rigidity, and the ones most hurt are always the retail investors and the true builders.
A no longer repeats the tragedy but writes a new narrative.
A not only denies B1's model but also establishes an on-chain structure of 'tasks as incentives, contributions as governance'. It does not rely on financing, does not worship large institutions, nor does it use logo changes to tell new stories. A relies on genuine consensus replacement, an open incentive mechanism, and an automated distribution system.
It does not ask who you are, only what you have contributed. It does not depend on authority to decide the direction, but on code and community consensus to determine the rules.
In an era where others are 'EOS-ifying', A has successfully completed the evolution of 'Anti-EOS-ification'.
In this seemingly competitive world of countless chains, which is actually a replay of routines, A is one of the few projects daring to revolutionize itself. It is the fruit of reflection on failure, a public challenge to the structure of concentrated power, and a symbolic milestone in the self-correction of the new era's public chains.
In the future, we may see more projects follow the old path of EOS, but we will no longer accompany them in their decline. We choose A, choose self-rescue, and choose to restart in a truly decentralized manner.