State a fact: ETH, SOL, including BTC, handle security incidents in the same way. The decentralization we pursue should not come at the cost of innocent people's property. A vulnerability itself is a technical design flaw, not a failure of the blockchain consensus mechanism.

• Ethereum rolled back The DAO attack through a hard fork in 2016, saving ETH worth 60 million USD at that time (3.6 million ETH, worth 1 billion USD at current prices).

• Solana has experienced multiple downtimes - September 2021, May 2022, February 2023.

• Bitcoin rolled back a vulnerability from 2010 that created 184 billion BTC. Yes - billion, that BTC no longer exists.

However, when SUI froze 160 million USD of stolen funds using protective mechanisms, and the validating nodes froze the protocol to protect user assets, it faced many doubts: "Centralization! Scammers!"

The key is not whether centralized technology is used, but whether these mechanisms are transparent, controllable, and in line with community consensus.

If your understanding of decentralization is "allowing hackers to run away with money at will," then BTC and ETH would no longer exist, and your assets could not be protected and could be plundered. This is not decentralization but anarchism.