#苹果放宽加密规则 1. Support for Easing Encryption Policies (Approximately 35%) **

1. **Law Enforcement Convenience**: Assisting police in obtaining evidence of crimes, cracking major cases involving terrorism, child pornography, etc.

2. **National Security Considerations**: The government can prevent encrypted communications from being exploited by extremist organizations, such as ISIS using Telegram to plan terrorist attacks.

3. **Child Protection Needs**: The feasibility of technology to scan for child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) in iCloud photos has increased.

4. **Corporate Compliance Pressure**: Responding to new regulations such as the EU's Digital Markets Act to avoid hefty fines (up to 20% of global revenue).

5. **Market Access Strategies**: Complying with regulatory requirements in emerging markets like Brazil and India to obtain hardware sales licenses.

**2. Opposition to Easing Encryption Policies (Approximately 45%)**

1. **Privacy Rights Crisis**: The 2021 CSAM scanning plan faced opposition from 56 organizations including EDRi due to the potential for false positives (a one in a billion error rate would still affect thousands).

2. **Risk of Surveillance Abuse**: Referring to the Snowden incident, government data requests surged from 0-999 cases in 2013 to 193,000 globally in 2022.

3. **Concerns Over Technological Regression**: End-to-end encryption technology may regress; the FBI's request to unlock the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone in 2016 triggered industry backlash.

4. **Loss of Commercial Reputation**: Brand trust is undermined; a 2021 consumer privacy survey showed that 83% of users value device encryption features.

5. **Increased Legal Conflicts**: The EU's GDPR requires minimizing data collection, which conflicts with the jurisdiction of the US CLOUD Act.