In the spring of 2025, the entire cryptocurrency market heats up again, and in this new cycle, Solana has undoubtedly become one of the most dazzling names. From underlying architecture optimization to the meme ecosystem explosion, from high speed and low fees to explosive growth in the developer ecosystem, Solana seems to have mastered the market rhythm's dominance. Once regarded as an 'Ethereum challenger,' it is now standing at the center of the bull market spotlight as an independently strong public chain.
But did Solana really win? Or more accurately, does this competition about blockchain infrastructure really have an endpoint?
Perhaps the answer lies in another direction. Instead of replicating Solana's rhythm, it is about reconstructing the entire rules of the game. And this is exactly what the Origins public chain is doing.
Solana's success is a dual victory of technology and narrative: extreme performance parameters, low Gas fees, massive capital support, and the community vitality stacked by multiple narratives such as NFT, meme, and DeFi. However, its high performance stems from a highly centralized operating structure, which still relies on a few data centers for stable operation behind its billion-level market capitalization. Such success is indeed dazzling, but it also comes with long-term sustainability questions.
The path chosen by the Origins public chain is another form of extremity.
Origins does not attempt to compete with Solana head-on in TPS or transaction costs, but rather redefines the value connotation of 'high performance' and 'multi-scenario compatibility' by constructing a new public chain architecture centered on an AI + decentralized computing power collaborative network. In this architecture, the public chain is not only the foundation for DApp operations but also a key cornerstone for AI agent operations, task scheduling, data verification, and value loop construction.
Solana's developer ecosystem relies on speed and composability, while Origins provides a larger experimental space: AI models can be called on-chain, training results can be verified on-chain, GPU resources can be registered as DePIN nodes, and even cooperation among agents (MCP protocol) can achieve resource settlement through on-chain contracts. This is a more complex and futuristic ecological model—not only serving token trading and contract deployment but also serving the scheduling of real computing resources and the growth of intelligent economies.
Chasing Solana has never been a simple speed race.
In a sense, Solana defined the feasibility of a high-speed asynchronous network, while Origins is attempting to connect this network with real-world resources (computing power, data, identity, governance). We are not running on Solana's track; we are exploring a new trajectory in another dimension.
The current market has gradually evolved from a 'purely performance-oriented' approach to 'multiple capabilities overlay': Who can support AI computing power? Who can support RWA on-chain? Who can carry global node governance? This is the core indicator of future public chain competition. The global node deployment mechanism, modular governance framework, and compliance connection capabilities of Origins are gradually making it part of this answer.
Solana may have won a phase, but victory in the blockchain world has never been definitive. Next, the larger narrative space will belong to those infrastructure providers who can penetrate the market bubble and confront real demands.
In this future that will soon be dominated by AI and decentralized computing power, Origins is not chasing Solana but is on a deeper and longer path.