Not to mention the profit rollback, is the user's principal also being rolled back?
At the time of the incident, I initially supported the exchange's rollback operation, after all, any platform would find it difficult to bear huge losses (I did not receive any fees, the traffic is low, and the exchange usually does not pay attention). But I urge Bitget to pay attention to the follow-up work of the rollback, can it provide users with a more reasonable solution? Can it avoid wrongfully killing the innocent?
As of now, I have seen several coin friends share screenshots of trading timestamps, all claiming that Bitget mistakenly rolled back the user's principal during the rollback process.
This is simply outrageous! Could it be that Bitget has been plagued by unprofessional market makers, poor public relations capabilities, and numerous loopholes in risk control mechanisms, and even has frequent issues with the rollback operation?
Please refund the users' funds immediately!
Originally, I had a good impression of Bitget during this period, and even recommended group friends to buy BGB during multiple market declines, and everyone indeed made a decent profit.
As a platform that has emerged from a small exchange to rank among the third tier (alongside Bybit), I understand that smaller platforms outside of the top Chinese exchanges inevitably engage in self-market-making behavior, so I supported the rollback operation at the beginning of the incident.
But now, the practice of freezing the user's principal is truly excessive; this is by no means a simple mistake -
Either the technical team is worrying, unable to distinguish between normal users and abnormal profit-makers, and can only take a 'one-size-fits-all' control;
Or the higher-ups have malicious intentions, attempting to compensate for platform losses by withholding principal, engaging in 'draining the swamp.'
No wonder the BG boss once claimed, 'The money users deposit is my money.' Is it really the case that they want to appropriate even the principal now?
