The event of the US imposing tariffs on Australia's overseas territories of Heard Island and McDonald Islands seems absurd but reflects complex trade policy motives. Here is a detailed analysis:

1. Policy Background and Symbolic Significance

  • Comprehensive Tariff Strategy: The Trump administration recently proposed a comprehensive 10% tariff on all imported goods globally. This policy aims to exert indiscriminate pressure, forcing trading partners to renegotiate or concede. Including uninhabited islands may be intended to demonstrate a 'loophole-free' execution of the policy, enhancing its deterrent effect.

  • Political Signal Transmission: Although these islands have no actual trade, including them on the list can highlight the government's tough image of 'not sparing even the penguins', catering to domestic protectionist voters while testing international reactions.

2. The Logic of Closing Loopholes and the Reality of Contradictions

  • Preventive Legislation: The US Department of Commerce is concerned that companies might evade tariffs by fabricating origins (such as registering shell companies on these islands). For example, if Chinese exporters claim that goods are transshipped through Heard Island, they may be eligible for preferential tariff rates under the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement.

  • The feasibility is doubtful: Heard Island has no permanent population, no port facilities, and is covered by glaciers year-round, making actual transit possibilities zero. The policy is more aimed at theoretical legal loopholes rather than real threats.

3. International Law and Diplomatic Impact

  • WTO Compliance Issues: According to the WTO's Most-Favored-Nation principle, if the US unilaterally imposes tariffs on a specific region, it must demonstrate the existence of dumping or subsidies. However, Heard Island has no exports, and this action could be viewed as an abuse of the national security exception, leading to legal disputes.

  • Test of Australia-US Relations: Although Australian Prime Minister Albanese called this move 'absurd', the deeper concern lies in the arbitrary nature of the US including allied territories in sanctions, which could affect trust in cooperation between the two countries regarding the Indo-Pacific strategy.

4. Geopolitical Extension Interpretation

  • Antarctic Sovereignty Game: Heard Island is close to Antarctica, and the US may use this to strengthen its involvement in Antarctic affairs. In 2023, Australia expanded its research station there, and the tariff measures may serve as a covert check on its Antarctic activities.

  • Supply Chain De-globalization: By incorporating every corner of the globe into a tariff network, the US is attempting to reshape a 'controllable trade circle', forcing companies to completely reorganize supply chains rather than seeking alternative transshipment points.

5. Predictions of Subsequent Impacts

  • The actual economic impact is limited: In 2023, the bilateral trade volume between the US and Australia was $66.7 billion, of which 99.7% consisted of domestic goods. The symbolic significance of island tariffs outweighs the substantive impact.

  • Demonstration Effect Risk: If other countries emulate such 'geographic-targeted tariffs', it could lead to fragmentation of the trade system. For instance, the EU may impose retaliatory tariffs on US-owned uninhabited islands.

This event reveals a trend where trade policies are increasingly becoming tools for political performance in the context of globalization retreating. When tariff lists even cover penguin habitats, it reflects not only the alienation of economic logic but also a deep crisis of international rules being eroded by power politics.

Welcome to follow Web3 Coin World, which updates stories about the coin circle or coins every day. Your attention is the source of my creative motivation. #比特币

Binance registration link: https://www.binance.com/zh-CN/join?ref=R0L9EBCX