🎯 #𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗰𝘀: Where Web3 Wins or Turns to Digital Dust 💥
Dev loves to talk about consensus, security, EVM compatibility, but forgets the basics:
💀 Without decent tokenomics, your protocol is just a slower rug pull.
Let's go through the commandments of the Web3 survivor:
🚫 1. Infinite supply? Only if it's of failure.
If your token inflates more than a founder's tweet, the market will inflate its rejection too.
🪙 Supply matters. Ask $BTC .
🎯 2. Fair distribution, or it will not be distributed to anyone.
90% in the hands of the team? Congratulations, you've created a well-structured scam.
🧃 3. Use case? Or is it just decorative token?
Real governance, staking with purpose, and rewards that don't turn into dumps are the minimum.
🧠 4. A good incentive is what creates value, not what attracts farm hunters.
If the guy comes in, extracts everything, and leaves… congratulations, you paid to be abandoned.
🕰️ 5. Vesting exists so you don't wake up to a free-fall chart.
Want to launch without a time lock? Go with God and liquidity.
🏛️ 6. A DAO that only serves to look decentralized is Web3 theater.
If the token decides nothing, it shouldn't exist.
🔥 7. Burn tokens right, or don't even light that match.
Burning only matters if there is real use. Otherwise, it's just on-chain decoration. See $BNB .
📉 Conclusion: Good code does not resurrect bad tokenomics.
Want to survive the bear? Write tokenomics as if your life (and the TVL) depended on it — because it does.
📢 Degen comment of the day:
"My project had everything. Just lacked tokenomics. Now it's a case study in rugbase." 🪦
