狂人叨逼叨
--
By chance, I achieved a multiplier of 15 times, and Kaito's mindset players came out on top
Yesterday, Kaito's coin distribution and listing attracted quite a bit of attention, but I was somewhat surprised by the performance. I happened to be busy outside yesterday, and by the time I received a message from a friend saying that the coins had been distributed, the price was already hovering around 1 dollar. When I got home to claim it, it had even directly dropped below 1 dollar. I then roughly scanned through everyone's feedback and found that the multiplier distribution varied significantly; some were as low as 4 times, while others reached as high as 16 times, and my own multiplier was 15.14 times, which is considered above average.
Objectively speaking, I am quite satisfied with this result. After all, I did not deliberately try to grind for points; since I adjusted my mindset last time, I have adopted a go-with-the-flow strategy, completing tasks step by step every day, so the score growth has been naturally slow. To achieve 15.14 times, I am quite content. However, seeing some friends who invested a lot of effort only get lower multipliers makes me feel a bit emotional. This reminds me of the previously mentioned issue: the lack of transparency in the rules makes it hard for everyone to grasp the direction of their efforts, and the input and output seem not to be proportional.
As for the price performance, starting at 1 dollar is indeed a bit lower than expected. For example, in the BNB airdrop I participated in before, this time the returns seem particularly meager. When estimating yesterday, it was obviously too cautious. More crucially, as I predicted earlier, the motivation to continue grinding Kaito after the coin distribution may drastically decline, as the returns have already been set, and the enthusiasm of new users is likely to cool off quickly.
Additionally, I noticed a detail: does the height of the multiplier relate to voting behavior? I voted for 12 projects cumulatively, and the multiplier is quite decent, while some friends who voted less seem to have lower multipliers. Does this imply that there is some kind of correlation hidden in the rules? Currently, it's just a guess, and the specific mechanism still needs more data verification. #币安上线KAITO
Yesterday, Kaito's coin distribution and listing attracted quite a bit of attention, but I was somewhat surprised by the performance. I happened to be busy outside yesterday, and by the time I received a message from a friend saying that the coins had been distributed, the price was already hovering around 1 dollar. When I got home to claim it, it had even directly dropped below 1 dollar. I then roughly scanned through everyone's feedback and found that the multiplier distribution varied significantly; some were as low as 4 times, while others reached as high as 16 times, and my own multiplier was 15.14 times, which is considered above average.
Objectively speaking, I am quite satisfied with this result. After all, I did not deliberately try to grind for points; since I adjusted my mindset last time, I have adopted a go-with-the-flow strategy, completing tasks step by step every day, so the score growth has been naturally slow. To achieve 15.14 times, I am quite content. However, seeing some friends who invested a lot of effort only get lower multipliers makes me feel a bit emotional. This reminds me of the previously mentioned issue: the lack of transparency in the rules makes it hard for everyone to grasp the direction of their efforts, and the input and output seem not to be proportional.
As for the price performance, starting at 1 dollar is indeed a bit lower than expected. For example, in the BNB airdrop I participated in before, this time the returns seem particularly meager. When estimating yesterday, it was obviously too cautious. More crucially, as I predicted earlier, the motivation to continue grinding Kaito after the coin distribution may drastically decline, as the returns have already been set, and the enthusiasm of new users is likely to cool off quickly.
Additionally, I noticed a detail: does the height of the multiplier relate to voting behavior? I voted for 12 projects cumulatively, and the multiplier is quite decent, while some friends who voted less seem to have lower multipliers. Does this imply that there is some kind of correlation hidden in the rules? Currently, it's just a guess, and the specific mechanism still needs more data verification. #币安上线KAITO
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
4
0