#阿根廷总统MEME币争议

On February 14, Argentine President Mille promoted the MEME coin $LIBRA on social media, saying it would support small and medium-sized enterprises. However, the market value of the token surged to $4.56 billion half an hour after it went online, and then plummeted by 94%, causing heavy losses to investors. The presidential palace subsequently deleted the tweet and launched an anti-corruption investigation, and the opposition pushed for impeachment on the grounds of "fraud".

The paradox of national sovereign credit and Meme coins

Mille implanted the political slogan "Viva La Libertad" (Viva La Libertad) into the token name, essentially trying to reshape the national economic narrative with encrypted assets. However, the project party completed the contract deployment and sell-off in only 3 hours, exposing that sovereign-backed projects are more risky than ordinary local dogs - when national credit becomes a harvesting tool, it may trigger a hidden collapse in sovereign debt ratings.

The regulatory vacuum of the Rug Pull scam

This incident reveals two blind spots in the regulation of the crypto market:

• Lack of celebrity responsibility definition: The US SEC only requires risk warnings for Trumpcoin, but as president, Milley promoted unaudited projects, and there is no precedent for accountability under existing international law;

• Out-of-control contract authority: 82% of tokens were initially tradable (only 20% for ordinary MEME coins), and the smart contract did not set a lock-up mechanism, allowing the project party to withdraw at zero cost.

When "decentralization" encounters "populism":

The essence of the Milley incident is the collision between crypto anarchism and the political strongman model - he tried to use MEME coins to bypass the traditional fiscal system to stimulate the economy, but it evolved into a national trust crisis due to the lack of a compliance framework. This may give rise to a new regulatory paradigm: "cooling-off period disclosure" and "income freezing mechanism" for the president's participation in crypto projects.

________________________________________

1. If the issuance of MEME coins by the state becomes a trend, do you think it should be forcibly linked to gold reserves or national debt credit?

2. When the president’s tweet becomes a signal of a surge in token prices, how can ordinary people distinguish between “policy dividends” and “political scams”?